Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

release-readiness

Go / no-go gate before any deployment. Checks failure modes, rollback plan, cost, production bar, and definition of done. Trigger before releasing to any environment that carries real consequences.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Release Readiness

A working demo is not evidence of production readiness. Production readiness is proven through sustained operation, incident handling, cost predictability, and controlled evolution.

This skill enforces the production bar. It produces a go / no-go verdict with a signed checklist. No checklist = no go.

When to use

  • Before deploying to staging or production
  • Before handing a system to another team
  • Before declaring a sprint or milestone complete
  • When someone says "it works on my machine"

Procedure

  1. Validate the definition of done — confirm that acceptance criteria from the spec are met. "Looks good" is not a criterion. Run the actual validation commands.

  2. Check all quality gates pass under the approved release ADR and profile. Require candidate/artifact-bound receipts from the declared executor; a hosted CI outage never permits silently dropping a gate. Run the release structural preflight after the artifact exists and before promotion, then independently verify its receipts. Structural PASS neither authenticates approvals nor proves test outcomes. The commands below are defaults; use the project's declared equivalents:

    • make lint — style and static analysis clean
    • make typecheck — no type errors
    • make test — unit tests green
    • make e2e — end-to-end tests green (or equivalent for your stack)
    • No outstanding HIGH or CRITICAL findings from security scan
  3. Name the failure modes — at minimum:

    • What happens if the service is unavailable?
    • What happens under unexpected load?
    • What happens if a dependency (external API, database, queue) is degraded?
    • What is the data-loss risk?
  4. Confirm rollback exists and is tested — a rollback plan that has never been tested is not a rollback plan. If the rollback has not been exercised, flag it.

  5. Estimate cost impact — LLM calls, storage writes, egress, third-party API calls. Any unbounded cost vector must be capped or accepted explicitly.

  6. Confirm planned service acceptance — verify applicable receiving-owner acceptance, support and knowledge-transfer evidence from the planning prerequisites. A document existing is not proof that the receiving team can operate the service.

  7. Confirm monitoring and alerting — what fires when this breaks? Who gets the alert? What is the on-call runbook?

  8. Check data boundaries — does the release touch PII, regulated data, or cross a tenant boundary? If yes, confirm the appropriate controls are in place.

  9. Sign off — record: who reviewed, what was checked, what was accepted as known risk, and the go/no-go verdict.

Outputs

  • Signed release checklist (append to PR or release doc)
  • Go / no-go verdict
  • List of accepted known risks with named owners

Guardrails

  • No go without a rollback plan. "We'll figure it out" is not a rollback.
  • Passing declared gates is necessary, not sufficient. Release readiness also checks failure modes, authority, artifact identity and observation in either mode.
  • Cost estimates are not optional. An unbounded LLM call in a hot path is a production incident waiting to happen.
  • Monitoring must exist before go-live, not after. "We'll add monitoring later" means the first incident is invisible.

Anti-rationalization table

ExcuseCounter
"CI is green, we're good to go"CI checks known paths. Release readiness checks failure modes CI doesn't cover.
"We'll monitor it after launch"The first failure will be invisible. Add monitoring before go-live.
"Rollback is just redeploy the previous version"Untested. Run the rollback in staging first.
"Cost is fine, it's low traffic"Low traffic + an LLM loop bug = runaway spend. Cap it.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Google ADK (Agent Development Kit) orchestration patterns — boundaries, agent composition, and tool seams. Trigger when designing or reviewing multi-agent systems built on ADK. Authoritative source: adk.dev.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience13Updated Oct 16, 2026

JP's signature red-team pass — "how would I break this?" Argue against your own approach before proceeding. Trigger on any high-stakes decision, architecture choice, or before marking work complete.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience13Updated Oct 16, 2026

Read-only SRE checkup of any GCP project: deterministic probes of the edge, Cloud Run services, 7-day error logs, Cloud Scheduler, alert policies and uptime checks, Secret Manager and IAM, the data stores and the machine's own scheduled jobs, audited into one fixed status table (LIVE / WARNING / RED / INCONCLUSIVE) with evidence, findings by severity, what could not be checked, and a single OVERALL line delivered as one notification. Parametrised by a per-project manifest, so the same routine runs on every project. Use when the operator says "cloud checkup", "SRE check", "is everything live", "what's healthy / warning / red", "any errors this week", "audit the infra", "weekly checkup", "set up the weekly checkup", before a deploy or demo, or after an incident. Cloud Run first; App Engine and GKE differ only in the serving probes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience13Updated Oct 16, 2026

Cloud guardrails for any vendor workload — Google Cloud (GCP, Vertex AI, GKE), AWS (IAM, EKS, Bedrock), Azure (Entra ID, Policy, AKS), Alibaba Cloud (RAM, mainland/international residency). Enforces identity least-privilege, mechanical policy, data boundaries, residency, cost caps, network egress and observability, with official-source validation before any claim. Trigger on any cloud infrastructure design, review, Terraform plan, or LLM/agent deployment; the-architect routes here.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience13Updated Oct 16, 2026

LLM and cloud cost awareness — model tiering, token budgets, right-sizing, and when a cheaper model suffices. Trigger before finalising any architecture that calls LLMs, before scaling a workload, or when a cost estimate is needed.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience13Updated Oct 16, 2026

Challenge vision alignment, value, cost, risk and operating ownership at material scope or release decisions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience13Updated Oct 16, 2026

See all skills by jpantsjoha

Report a problem with this skill