Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

caveman-manage

Review Caveman Cloud experiment states, evaluation results, and safety checks to recommend a supported next action. Identify missing or failing evidence and explain execution blocks; the current agent interface reads experiment data without changing its lifecycle state.

OriginalShow the original description

Inspect Caveman Cloud's experiment lifecycle and block unsafe execution. Use when asked to start, approve, cancel, promote or roll back a Caveman experiment.

See how to install

Good for

  • Reviewing whether an experiment is ready to start
  • Checking whether evidence supports experiment approval
  • Assessing cancellation or rollback options
  • Confirming state after an operator's external action

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Manage eval-gated experiments

Treat every lifecycle change as a production control action. Read current state and results, then report one supported recommendation or block. Current agent MCP is intentionally read-only: control-api does not yet enforce a complete lifecycle transition table and evidence gate atomically.

Non-negotiable gates

  1. A request to review, inspect, explain, or recommend authorizes reads only.
  2. Never approve an experiment whose results are pending, whose required guardrails are absent, or whose evidence reports a breach.
  3. Never convert experiment lift into verified_savings. Only active real traffic plus provider-causal, provider-complete ledger evidence can do that.
  4. Never supply an organization id. Project and tenant scope come from the logged-in Caveman identity and server RBAC.
  5. Never execute a lifecycle mutation, even after user approval. Exact <action>:<experiment_id> strings are agent-generatable and are not proof of human intent.
  6. Unknown states and server errors fail closed. Report exact cave_snake_code.

Step 1 — Load project and experiment

Prefer MCP:

caveman_context {}
caveman_experiment_get {"action":"get","experiment_id":"<id>"}
caveman_experiment_get {"action":"results","experiment_id":"<id>"}

Use {"action":"list"} when the user has not named an id.

CLI fallback:

caveman cloud experiments list
caveman cloud experiments show <id>
caveman cloud experiments results <id>

Stop if login, project, experiment, or results are unavailable.

Step 2 — Evaluate evidence

Report:

  • current lifecycle state and safety class;
  • control and candidate sample sizes;
  • quality or eval result;
  • latency, error, cost, retry, drop, and escalation guardrails when present;
  • evidence cost;
  • rollback or hold reason;
  • whether result is pending, failed, promotable, or active.

Absence is not a pass. If a required field is absent, state evidence incomplete and do not propose approval.

Step 3 — Propose one action

Allowed actions:

  • start — only from a startable draft or queued state with configured graders;
  • approve — only with complete passing evidence and a safety class the current role may approve;
  • cancel — stop a non-active experiment the user no longer wants;
  • rollback — revert an active or harmful change through the server's linked policy path. Current deployments may reject this honestly with cave_not_implemented; never describe that response as a rollback.

Show recommendation and id:

Proposed action: approve experiment 7f...
Reason: candidate passed quality and every configured guardrail.
Execution: blocked until server-authoritative lifecycle and evidence gates ship.

Do not treat earlier generic statements such as "manage it" or "do what is best" as mutation approval.

Step 4 — Block unsafe execution

Do not emit or run an executable lifecycle command. Explain that current server does not yet enforce every evidence/state transition atomically. CLI and MCP agent surfaces therefore expose experiment reads only.

Step 5 — Re-read after external operator action

If operator says they executed command, read detail and results again. Report server-observed post-state, audit or result response, and any policy-delivery status returned. Never infer success from operator intent alone.

Use this close:

Action: <action> <experiment-id>
Before: <state>
Server response: <status and cave_snake_code if any>
After: <re-read state>
Basis: experiment evidence only. Verified savings unchanged unless the signed
ledger independently records active, provider-causal real-traffic savings.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

cavecrew

FreeSummary

Delegate code lookup, small edits, and diff reviews to three specialized subagents. Their compact, structured results help conserve the main agent's context, with guidance on when to delegate and when to keep work in the main conversation.

  • Locating definitions and callers
  • Making a focused edit across one or two files
  • Reviewing a diff for bugs
JuliusBrussee/caveman113.5KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

caveman

FreeSummary

Make agent replies shorter and easier to scan by putting answers first and removing filler. Preserves technical details, exact commands, numbers, and essential conditions while keeping the user's chosen language.

  • Reading concise replies in a terminal
  • Getting conclusions before explanations
  • Reducing wording while keeping technical details
JuliusBrussee/caveman113.5KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

caveman-commit

FreeSummary

Create short commit messages using Conventional Commits, a format that labels the type of change. Emphasize intent, keep the subject concise, and include explanatory text when breaking changes, security fixes, data migrations, or reversions require context.

  • Writing a commit message for code changes
  • Standardizing commit message format
  • Documenting breaking changes and migration steps
JuliusBrussee/caveman113.5KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

caveman-compress

FreeSummary

Compress memory files and task lists into shorter wording to reduce input tokens. Keeps code and document structure intact, saves a readable backup separately, and sends the text to the configured model provider.

  • Shortening CLAUDE.md to reduce input tokens
  • Compressing task lists and preference files
  • Keeping readable backups of compressed files
JuliusBrussee/caveman113.5KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

caveman-discover

FreeSummary

Find LLM workflows in a codebase and label them by the job they perform, so Caveman Cloud can separate spending by workflow. Present a labeling proposal for approval, apply focused code changes, and check an affected execution path.

  • Breaking down LLM spending by job
  • Inventorying LLM use in APIs, scheduled jobs, and scripts
  • Separating evaluation spending from other workflows
JuliusBrussee/caveman113.5KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

Review Caveman Cloud spending, latency, errors, and potential improvements using current reports and traces, or individual execution records. Produce findings tied to time windows and trace IDs, while keeping measured costs, estimated opportunities, and verified savings separate.

  • Understanding which workflows drive LLM spending
  • Investigating slow responses and errors
  • Reviewing measured costs and verified savings separately
JuliusBrussee/caveman113.5KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

See all skills by JuliusBrussee

Report a problem with this skill