Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

codex-cli

Delegate coding, analysis, refactoring, or reviews from Claude Code to Codex CLI. The skill explains unattended execution, permission settings, output capture, parallel tasks, and independent checks of changed files and test results.

OriginalShow the original description

Drive OpenAI's Codex CLI (`codex exec`) as a non-interactive coding sub-agent from inside Claude Code. Load WHENEVER you want to delegate a coding/analysis/refactor task to Codex, get a second opinion / adversarial review from another model, fan out parallel agents across files or worktrees, or run a long mechanical job while you stay the planner. Covers the exact `codex exec` flags, sandbox tiers, output capture, JSON/schema modes, session resume, parallel fan-out, and the mandatory "delegate → capture → independently verify, never trust the self-report" supervision loop.

Works withOpenAI
See how to install

Good for

  • Delegate implementation while retaining planning responsibility
  • Get a second opinion on code changes
  • Split independent tasks across separate git worktrees
  • Resume a delegated task with corrections

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md6.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

<skill name="codex-cli"> <overview> Codex CLI is OpenAI's terminal coding agent (Rust). Its **non-interactive** mode, `codex exec`, makes it a perfect disposable sub-agent: you write the metaprompt, Codex explores/edits/runs commands on its own, and returns a final message you capture and verify. You stay the long-context planner; Codex is the implementer.

The golden rule: Codex's self-report is a claim, not the truth. Always capture its output, then independently verify the artifacts yourself (read the files, re-run the tests) before treating the task as done.

Verified available on this machine: codex-cli 0.137.0, logged in via ChatGPT (no API key needed). Confirm with codex login status. </overview>

<the-core-command> The one shape you'll use most:
codex exec \
  --cd <workdir> \
  --sandbox <read-only|workspace-write|danger-full-access> \
  -o /tmp/codex_<rand>.txt \
  "your metaprompt here"  2>>/tmp/codex_<rand>.log
  • Prompt as the final arg, OR pipe via stdin: echo "$PROMPT" | codex exec - (good for long/generated prompts). If both are given, stdin is appended.
  • -o, --output-last-message <file> — writes ONLY Codex's final message to a file. This is your clean capture; read it back, don't scrape the TUI stream.
  • 2>>/tmp/...log — Codex streams progress/reasoning to stderr; the final message goes to stdout. Redirect stderr to a log so it doesn't bloat your context. Generate the suffix with openssl rand -hex 4.
  • --cd <dir> — Codex's working root. Scope it to the relevant subdir (e.g. apps/api), not the whole monorepo, so it stays focused.
  • --skip-git-repo-check — only needed when running outside a git repo. </the-core-command>
<sandbox-tiers> Pick the **least** privilege that lets the task succeed:
  • read-only (default) — Codex can read/grep/run read-only commands but cannot edit files or hit the network. Use for review, analysis, planning, "find the bug", second opinions.
  • workspace-write — can edit files in --cd (and --add-dir paths) and run commands, but no network by default. Use for real implementation/refactors.
  • danger-full-access — no sandbox at all. Avoid; only for throwaway/ephemeral dirs you fully control.

Approvals: in exec mode Codex does not prompt for approvals. For a fully autonomous run with no gating at all, add --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox. This is powerful — only use it when the user has explicitly authorized autonomous edits AND the --cd is scoped, or when running in an already-sandboxed/throwaway dir. When unsure, ask the user which sandbox tier before running with write access. </sandbox-tiers>

<output-modes> - Default: human-readable, final message on stdout (+ capture with `-o`). - `--json` — newline-delimited JSON events on stdout (tool calls, file changes, messages). Use when you want to parse what Codex actually did, not just its prose summary. - `--output-schema <file.json>` — force Codex's final response to conform to a JSON Schema. Use for reliable structured hand-back (e.g. a list of findings). - `-m, --model <model>` — pin the model. `-i, --image <file>` — attach images. `--add-dir <dir>` — extra writable roots. `--ephemeral` — don't persist the session to disk. </output-modes> <session-resume> Codex sessions are stateful. To continue a prior run with its context intact:
codex exec resume --last "now also update the tests"   # most recent session
codex exec resume <session-id> "..."                   # a specific one

The session id is printed at the start of each exec run. Use resume for multi-turn delegation (draft → refine → fix) instead of re-sending all context. </session-resume>

<delegation-patterns> - **One-shot task** — scope `--cd`, `workspace-write`, `-o` capture, verify. - **Second opinion / adversarial review** — `read-only`, ask Codex to find bugs or critique your diff. Different model, different blind spots. - **Plan/implement split** — you write the spec, Codex implements it, you review. - **Refactor + test split** — Codex does the mechanical edit; you write/verify the tests (or vice-versa). Cross-checking catches more. - **Parallel fan-out** — for N independent files/tasks, launch N `codex exec` runs, each with its own `-o`/log file. To avoid edit collisions when multiple WRITE runs touch the repo at once, give each its own git worktree (`git worktree add`) and point `--cd` there. - **Cost routing** — small mechanical fixes → Codex (ChatGPT quota); deep long-context work → keep it yourself. </delegation-patterns> <the-supervision-loop> Never skip this. After every delegated run:
  1. Delegate — codex exec ... -o <out> 2>><log>.
  2. Capture — read <out> (and <log>/--json if you need detail).
  3. Verify INDEPENDENTLY — do not trust Codex's "tests pass" / "done":
    • git status / git diff to see what actually changed.
    • Read the changed files yourself.
    • Re-run the build/tests/linter yourself and read the real output.
  4. Iterate — if wrong, codex exec resume --last "<correction>" and repeat.
  5. Report — tell the user what changed, what you verified, and how. State plainly when something failed or was skipped.

Cleanup: remove /tmp/codex_* capture/log files (and any throwaway worktrees) when done. </the-supervision-loop>

<repo-specifics> In this repo, respect the existing skills: prefer the `worktree` skill (`pnpm worktree`) for isolated parallel Codex runs, and the `testing` and `migration` skills' rules still apply to anything Codex produces — verify against them. A Codex run is not a license to bypass repo conventions; you own the result. </repo-specifics> </skill>

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

access-policy

FreeSummary

Review Slack access requests against Okta role and team information, then prepare narrowly scoped GitHub or AWS IAM permissions. Apply changes only after an eligible person's approval and record the grant, reasoning, approver, and timestamp.

  • Reviewing GitHub repository access requests from Slack
  • Preparing AWS IAM permissions for a specific task
  • Routing sensitive access requests for additional review
kortix-ai/suna20.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

account-research

FreeSummary

Research companies and people before outreach or meetings. Combines business profiles, recent news, hiring signals, and key contacts into a sourced brief with talking points and suggested questions, adding relationship history when CRM data is connected.

  • Research a prospective customer before outreach
  • Prepare background information for meeting attendees
  • Compare a competitor's products and positioning
kortix-ai/suna20.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

Review daily Google Ads and Meta Ads results for budget pacing, declining performance, and unusual activity. Get prioritized findings with supporting numbers and concrete recommendations for a marketing team to assess and carry out.

  • Checking whether campaign budgets are being spent on schedule
  • Investigating rising acquisition costs or falling ad returns
  • Finding ads and keywords that spend without converting
kortix-ai/suna20.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

agent-browser

FreeSummary

Automate website tasks such as navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, and extracting data. The skill also supports web app testing, with specialized guides for Electron desktop apps, Slack, and cloud browsers.

  • Automate form entry and page navigation
  • Capture screenshots and extract page data
  • Explore web apps for bugs
kortix-ai/suna20.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

ap-invoice-match

FreeSummary

Process emailed vendor invoices by extracting details, comparing them with purchase orders and invoice history, and recording duplicates, overcharges, or missing orders. Summarize results in Slack for human review; payment approval and execution remain with people.

  • Checking incoming invoices against purchase orders
  • Finding duplicate invoices and likely resends
  • Reviewing unit prices and remaining order balances
kortix-ai/suna20.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

billing

FreeSummary

Guide changes to Kortix billing code, admin controls, and pricing screens. Explain how plans, trials, enterprise contracts, and access exceptions should work, where pricing is defined, and which audited routes must handle account changes.

  • Update billing logic and its specification together
  • Review how trials and enterprise contracts are handled
  • Find the code that defines prices and allowances
kortix-ai/suna20.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

See all skills by kortix-ai

Report a problem with this skill