Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

prd

Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems. Includes an executive summary, personas, functional and non-functional requirements, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

krusty93/relego46 stars(GitHub 46 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Product Requirements Document (PRD)

Overview

Design comprehensive, production-grade Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) that bridge the gap between business vision and technical execution. This skill works for modern software systems, ensuring that requirements are clearly defined.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Starting a new product or feature development cycle
  • Translating a vague idea into a concrete technical specification
  • Stakeholders need a unified "source of truth" for project scope
  • User asks to "write a PRD", "document requirements", or "plan a feature"

Operational Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery (The Interview)

Before writing a single line of the PRD, you MUST interrogate the user to fill knowledge gaps. Do not assume context.

Ask about:

  • The Core Problem: Why are we building this now?
  • Success Metrics: How do we know it worked?
  • Constraints: Budget, tech stack, or deadline?

Phase 2: Analysis & Scoping

Synthesize the user's input. Identify dependencies and hidden complexities.

  • Map out the User Flow.
  • Define Non-Goals to protect the timeline.

Phase 3: Technical Drafting

Generate the document using the Strict PRD Schema below.


PRD Quality Standards

Requirements Quality

Use concrete, measurable criteria. Avoid "fast", "easy", or "intuitive".

# Vague (BAD)
- The search should be fast and return relevant results.
- The UI must look modern and be easy to use.

# Concrete (GOOD)
+ The search must return results within 200ms for a 10k record dataset.
+ The search algorithm must achieve >= 85% Precision@10 in benchmark evals.
+ The UI must follow the 'Vercel/Next.js' design system and achieve 100% Lighthouse Accessibility score.

Strict PRD Schema

You MUST follow this exact structure for the output:

1. Executive Summary

  • Problem Statement: 1-2 sentences on the pain point.
  • Proposed Solution: 1-2 sentences on the fix.
  • Success Criteria: 3-5 measurable KPIs.

2. User Experience & Functionality

  • User Personas: Who is this for?
  • Acceptance Criteria: Bulleted list of "Done" definitions for each requirement.
  • Non-Goals: What are we NOT building?

3. Technical Specifications

  • Architecture Overview: Data flow and component interaction.
  • Integration Points: APIs, DBs, and Auth.
  • Security & Privacy: Data handling and compliance.

4. Risks & Roadmap

  • Phased Rollout: MVP -> v1.1 -> v2.0.
  • Technical Risks: Latency, cost, or dependency failures.

Implementation Guidelines

DO (Always)

  • Iterate: Present a draft and ask for feedback on specific sections.

DON'T (Avoid)

  • Skip Discovery: Never write a PRD without asking at least 2 clarifying questions first.
  • Hallucinate Constraints: If the user didn't specify a tech stack, ask or label it as TBD.

Example: Documentation Search System

1. Executive Summary

Problem: Users struggle to find specific documentation snippets in massive repositories. Solution: A search system that returns ranked matching documents with direct source links. Success:

  • Reduce search time by 50%.
  • Top-5 result relevance >= 95%.

2. User Experience & Functionality

  • Personas: Developers searching large documentation repositories.
  • Acceptance Criteria:
    • Returns ranked results with source links.
    • Returns code blocks with a "Copy" button.
  • Non-Goals: Editing or authoring documentation.

3. Technical Specifications

  • Integration Points: Documentation index, search API.

4. Risks & Roadmap

  • Phased Rollout: MVP with keyword search, then ranking improvements.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

krusty93/relego46Updated Oct 29, 2026

Manages stacked PRs and splits multi-part work into reviewable branches with gh-stack. Use for stack creation, viewing, edits, push, submit, sync, rebase, merge, or checkout; when asked to split or isolate work for review; whenever a user mentions a stack, branch layers, dependent PRs, or gh stack; or when a stack is checked out.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

krusty93/relego46Updated Oct 29, 2026

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

krusty93/relego46Updated Oct 29, 2026

Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

krusty93/relego46Updated Oct 29, 2026

Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

krusty93/relego46Updated Oct 29, 2026

Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

krusty93/relego46Updated Oct 29, 2026

See all skills by krusty93

Report a problem with this skill