Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

tabular-review-lawvable

Guide to analyze multiple documents (PDF, DOCX) against user-defined columns and produce a structured Excel output with citations. Use when the user wants to: (1) Extract specific information from multiple documents into a table, (2) Compare clauses or provisions across contracts, (3) Create a document review matrix with source citations. Triggers on: 'tabular review', 'document matrix', 'extract from documents', 'compare across documents', 'review multiple contracts'.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Works withExcelWord

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (3)

  • SKILL.md5.2 KB
  • LICENSE.txt33.7 KB
  • README.md340 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Tabular Review

Extract structured data from multiple documents into an Excel matrix with citations.

Required Skills

  • pdf - For reading PDF documents
  • docx - For reading Word documents
  • xlsx - For creating the Excel output

Workflow

Step 1: Gather User Requirements

Use AskUserQuestion to collect:

  1. Document folder path - Where are the documents?
  2. Output filename - Name for the Excel file
  3. Columns to extract - What information to pull from each document

Example column definitions:

- Parties: Names of all parties to the agreement
- Effective Date: When the agreement becomes effective
- Term: Duration of the agreement
- Governing Law: Jurisdiction for disputes

Step 2: Discover Documents

Use Glob to find all documents:

Glob(pattern: "**/*.pdf", path: "<folder>")
Glob(pattern: "**/*.docx", path: "<folder>")

Step 3: Process Documents in Parallel

Launch background agents to process documents concurrently. Each agent:

  • Reads assigned documents using pdf or docx skill
  • Extracts values for each column
  • Captures page/paragraph citations
  • Returns structured JSON

Launch agents:

Task(
  prompt: "<agent_prompt>",
  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
  run_in_background: true
)

Agent prompt template:

You are processing documents for a tabular review.

DOCUMENTS TO PROCESS:
<list of document paths>

COLUMNS TO EXTRACT:
<column definitions>

For each document:
1. Read the document using the pdf skill (for .pdf) or docx skill (for .docx)
2. Extract the requested information for each column
3. Note the page number (PDF) or section (DOCX) where you found the information
4. Include a brief quote (30-50 chars) showing the source text

Return your results as JSON:
{
  "results": [
    {
      "document": "<filename>",
      "path": "<absolute_path>",
      "extractions": [
        {
          "column": "<column_name>",
          "value": "<extracted_value>",
          "page": <page_number>,
          "quote": "<brief_context_quote>"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

If you cannot find information for a column, set value to "Not found" and explain in the quote field.

Distribution strategy:

  • For N documents and M agents, each agent processes ceil(N/M) documents
  • Default: 10 agents maximum
  • Adjust based on document count

Step 4: Collect Results

Wait for all background agents to complete:

TaskOutput(task_id: "<agent_id>", block: true)

Aggregate all results into a single array of document extractions.

Step 5: Generate Excel Output

Invoke the xlsx skill to create the output file:

Create an Excel workbook at <output_path>:

SHEET 1: "Document Review"
- Header row: Document | <Column1> | <Column2> | ...
- Data rows: One row per document

For each extraction cell:
- Cell value: The extracted text
- Cell hyperlink: file://<document_path>#page=<N> (for PDFs)
- Cell comment: "Page <N>: '<quote>'"

SHEET 2: "Summary"
- Total documents: <count>
- Documents processed: <count>
- Extraction date: <today>

JSON Schema

Extraction result format:

{
  "document": "Contract_ABC.pdf",
  "path": "/path/to/Contract_ABC.pdf",
  "extractions": [
    {
      "column": "Parties",
      "value": "Acme Corp and Beta Inc",
      "page": 1,
      "quote": "entered into between Acme Corp and Beta Inc"
    },
    {
      "column": "Effective Date",
      "value": "January 15, 2025",
      "page": 1,
      "quote": "effective as of January 15, 2025"
    }
  ]
}

Excel Output Format

Cell with citation:

  • Value: "Acme Corp and Beta Inc"
  • Hyperlink: file:///path/to/Contract_ABC.pdf#page=1
  • Comment: Page 1: "entered into between Acme Corp and Beta Inc"

Color coding (optional):

  • Green: Value found with high confidence
  • Yellow: Value found but uncertain
  • Red: Value not found

Error Handling

ScenarioAction
Document unreadableLog error, mark row as failed, continue
Column not foundSet value to "Not found", explain in comment
Agent timeoutCollect partial results, note incomplete
Missing skillPrompt user to install required skill

Example Usage

User: I want to do a tabular review of my contracts

Claude: [Uses AskUserQuestion]
  - What folder contains your documents?
  - What should I name the output Excel file?
  - What columns do you want to extract?

User: ~/Contracts, review.xlsx, Parties/Date/Term/Governing Law

Claude: [Discovers 15 documents via Glob]
Claude: [Launches 5 background agents, 3 docs each]
Claude: [Collects results via TaskOutput]
Claude: [Creates review.xlsx via xlsx skill]

Output: review.xlsx with 15 rows, 4 columns, hyperlinks and citations

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Public-safe preliminary screen for challenges to the impartiality of an AI evaluator, LLM-as-a-judge, decision-support agent, or adjudicative system based on prior outputs, suspected bias, unstable reasoning, or self-reinforcing memory. Use when asked whether an AI should be recused, disqualified, replaced, audited, or escalated. Does not decide real cases or claim that human judicial-recusal doctrine automatically applies.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills894Updated Oct 20, 2026

Creates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allowed to do, who delegated authority to it, what actions are permitted or prohibited, when human approval is required, what evidence must be preserved, and how the agent can be suspended, revoked, or escalated.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills894Updated Oct 20, 2026

EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents (including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification — general principles, Annex I, Annex III). Answers any question about the AI Act with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, incident templates, and sector-specific guidance. This skill should be used when the user asks about the "EU AI Act", "AI Act regulation", "Regulation 2024/1689", "KI-Verordnung", asks to "explain an AI Act article", "what does Article X say", "AI Act requirements", "AI Act penalties", "AI Act timeline", "GPAI obligations", "high-risk AI", "prohibited AI practices", "AI Act and GDPR", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "AI Act standards", "AI Act national implementation", "AI literacy", "serious incident reporting", "Digital Omnibus", "AI regulatory sandbox", or any question about EU artificial intelligence regulation. Also triggers on German terms: "KI-Gesetz", "KI-Verordnung", "Hochrisiko-KI", "KI-Kompetenz", "Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung", "GPAI-Verhaltenskodex". For assessment workflows that produce a classification decision rather than a knowledge answer, offer to run a structured risk-tier classification in-session.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills894Updated Oct 20, 2026

This skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills894Updated Oct 20, 2026

Use this skill when the user wants an AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk review of an internal AI use case, an AI product feature, an LLM workflow, or a third-party AI vendor. The skill asks intake and clarifying questions first when facts or evidence are missing, identifies required documentation and missing evidence, maps the use case to AI governance frameworks and applicable legal domains, and produces a preliminary or final governance review with scorecards, findings, owners, remediation actions, and follow-up questions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills894Updated Oct 20, 2026

Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page interactive site, a Microsoft Word document, a PowerPoint deck, or a LaTeX/PDF. Use whenever a user has a stress-test result, ambiguity audit, or "where will this be litigated" scenarios and wants to publish, present, or share them. Triggers on "publish the audit," "make a report from this," "turn this into a website / deck / brief / Word doc," "make a Netlify site," "build slides of these ambiguities," "render the scenarios," "package this stress test," "produce a LaTeX version," and similar. Pairs with the ambiguity-stress-test skill (the underlying analysis) but works on any structured or semi-structured ambiguity analysis. Visual design is opinionated but the user can override colors, fonts, and brand label. Most formats need Python and a writable filesystem; single-file HTML works where the host has neither.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills894Updated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by lawve-ai

Report a problem with this skill