Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

content-pipeline

Non-interactive content-production toolkit: mine quotable moments from podcast RSS feeds and meeting notes, discover clip-worthy moments in video transcripts, repurpose long-form source into platform-native drafts (X, LinkedIn, YouTube Shorts, newsletter), and batch-score/gate those drafts before publish. Use when asked to "mine quotes from this podcast", "find clips in this video", "repurpose this into a thread / LinkedIn post / Short", "turn this transcript into posts", "extract viral moments", or "gate this batch of drafts". Runs Python scripts end to end. For interactive expert-panel scoring of a single artifact see content-ops.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Works withYouTubeLinkedIn
See how to install

Files included (10)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • .env.example1.1 KB
  • config/feeds.example.json146 B
  • README.md1.7 KB
  • requirements.txt370 B
  • scripts/content-quality-gate.py8.8 KB
  • scripts/content-quality-scorer.py17.5 KB
  • scripts/content-transform.py27.5 KB
  • scripts/editorial-brain.py18.4 KB
  • scripts/quote-mining-engine.py14.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Content Pipeline

Script-driven content production: ingest raw source, repurpose it into platform-native drafts, and gate the drafts before publish. All steps are non-interactive Python; chain them or run any stage standalone.

quote-mining ─┐
              ├─► content atoms ─► content-transform ─► drafts ─► quality-scorer ─► quality-gate ─► publish
editorial-brain ┘                       │
                          (optional in-loop expert panel from content-ops)

Setup

pip install -r requirements.txt      # anthropic, feedparser
cp .env.example .env                 # set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY; configure optional feeds/voice

All scripts read/write a data directory (default ./data/, override with CONTENT_OPS_DATA_DIR). Each stage writes a *-latest.json the next stage picks up.

Stages

  1. Ingest — quote mining. Scan podcast RSS feeds + local meeting notes for quotable, contrarian, viral-worthy moments; emit scored candidates.

    python scripts/quote-mining-engine.py --days 90 --top 50 --min-score 60 \
      --feeds config/feeds.json --notes-dir ./notes/ --speaker "Name"
    

    Feeds come from --feeds <json>, QUOTE_MINING_FEEDS_FILE, or inline QUOTE_MINING_FEEDS. See config/feeds.example.json.

  2. Ingest — editorial brain. Two-pass LLM clip discovery on a video transcript: pass 1 finds candidate hook→build→payoff moments, pass 2 deep-scores each on hook/build/payoff/clean-cut (0–100). Only clips at/above --min-score (default 90) are cut. Needs ANTHROPIC_API_KEY; video cutting needs yt-dlp + ffmpeg (see requirements.txt).

    python scripts/editorial-brain.py --url "https://youtube.com/watch?v=..." --max-clips 5
    python scripts/editorial-brain.py --vtt file.vtt --video-id ID --skip-cut   # analysis only
    
  3. Transform. Repurpose long-form "content atoms" into platform-native drafts — X threads/posts, LinkedIn posts, YouTube Short scripts, newsletter sections. LLM mode is default; --template-only runs without the API. The optional in-loop expert panel (--no-expert-panel to disable) reuses content-ops's experts/ and scoring-rubrics/content-quality.md — see Cross-skill dependency below.

    python scripts/content-transform.py --atoms atoms.json --top-n 10
    python scripts/content-transform.py --atoms atoms.json --template-only
    
  4. Score (batch, heuristic). Score a batch of drafts on five dimensions — voice similarity, specificity, AI-slop penalty, length appropriateness, engagement potential — and emit pass/fail per draft. No LLM; purely heuristic and fast. Default threshold 60; tune weights via --init-weights then edit data/quality-scorer-weights.json.

    python scripts/content-quality-scorer.py --input drafts.json --verbose
    python scripts/content-quality-scorer.py --threshold 75 --input drafts.json
    
  5. Gate (publish filter). CI-style gate that runs the scorer and filters drafts below threshold; nothing publishes without passing. --conservative passes everything but annotates quality flags instead of dropping.

    python scripts/content-quality-gate.py --input drafts.json --threshold 75
    

Input formats

Content atoms (transform input):

{ "atoms": [ { "id": "atom-001", "content": "Long-form source…", "tags": ["AI"], "platforms_missing": ["x","linkedin"], "repurpose_score": 8 } ] }

Drafts (scorer/gate input):

{ "drafts": [ { "id": "draft-001", "platform": "x", "draft": "Content text…" } ] }

Cross-skill dependency

content-transform.py's optional in-loop expert panel does not duplicate the rubric — it reads the sibling content-ops skill's experts/ panels and scoring-rubrics/content-quality.md. The path resolves to ../content-ops/ by default; override with CONTENT_OPS_SKILL_DIR if the skills live elsewhere. content-ops remains the single source of truth for panel definitions.

Related skills

  • content-ops — interactive expert-panel scorer; the canonical quality gate for a single artifact, and the source of the panels this pipeline reuses in content-transform
  • autoresearch — pre-launch variant generation + multi-round optimization for conversion copy

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

Run Karpathy-style autoresearch optimization on any content. Generates 50+ variants, scores with a 5-expert simulated panel, evolves winners through multiple rounds, outputs optimized version + full experiment log. Use when optimizing landing pages, email sequences, ad copy, headlines, form pages, CTA text, or any conversion-focused content. Triggers on "optimize this page", "run autoresearch", "score these variants", "A/B test this copy".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

Tests in real browsers. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM, capture console errors, analyze network requests, profile performance, or verify visual output with real runtime data via Chrome DevTools MCP.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

Conducts multi-axis code review across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Triggers on "review my PR", "review this diff", "code review", "review this changeset", "is this ready to merge", "pre-merge review".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

Estimate the full development cost of an existing codebase from lines of code, architectural complexity, and team-composition overhead. Use for 'how much would this cost to build', 'what did this codebase cost', development-cost or build-cost estimates, calendar-time estimates, and Claude/AI ROI on a delivered codebase. Estimates by measured LOC and complexity, not by ticket volume.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

Auto-assembles a domain-specific expert panel (7–10 experts), scores any content or strategy artifact against a typed rubric, and iterates until the aggregate hits 90+ (max 3 rounds). Use as a quality gate on copy, email sequences, landing-page drafts, strategy docs, charts, titles, or recruiting evaluations — or when another skill needs a final review gate on its output. Triggers on "expert panel this", "score this", "rate these variants", "quality check this", "panel review", "expert score", "evaluate this copy/strategy/page". For variant generation and multi-round conversion optimization see autoresearch; for live-URL CRO auditing see conversion-ops; for the scripted content-production pipeline see content-pipeline.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

See all skills by LazyIsEfficient

Report a problem with this skill