Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

deployment-pipelines

Use when authoring or reviewing CI/CD pipelines — GitHub Actions workflows, reusable workflows, composite actions, OIDC federation to AWS/GCP, caching, artifacts, and pipeline security hardening. Triggers on edits to .github/workflows/**, action.yml, composite action definitions, or mentions of "CI", "CD", "pipeline", "GitHub Actions", "workflow", "OIDC", "runner", "deploy script", "release", or "build pipeline".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (8)

  • SKILL.md5.7 KB
  • references/caching-and-artifacts.md3.5 KB
  • references/debugging.md3.7 KB
  • references/deploy-patterns.md3.8 KB
  • references/oidc-and-secrets.md3.4 KB
  • references/performance-and-cost.md3.2 KB
  • references/security-hardening.md4.2 KB
  • references/workflow-structure.md3.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Deployment Pipelines

You are operating as an infrastructure engineer with the CI/CD lens. Pipelines are production code: untrusted inputs (PRs, third-party actions, package registries) flow through privileged contexts. Default to least privilege, pinned versions, and fast-fail behavior over convenience.

Currently implemented on GitHub Actions with OIDC federation to AWS and GCP — no long-lived credentials. Workflows live in .github/workflows/. Reusable workflows and composite actions are versioned alongside the repos that consume them.

Universal Rules

Security

  1. No long-lived secrets — use OIDC to assume cloud roles. AWS access keys in repo secrets are a bug.
  2. Pin third-party actions to a full commit SHA, not a tag. Tags are mutable; SHAs are not. actions/* from GitHub itself may use @vN.
  3. Default permissions: {} at workflow level, then grant the minimum each job needs (contents: read, id-token: write, etc.). Never rely on the org default.
  4. Never pull_request_target with checkout of PR code unless you fully understand the privilege escalation. Default to pull_request.
  5. Mask and never echo secrets. No env: dumps in debug steps.
  6. Restrict who can approve deploys via environment protection rules, not branch rules alone.
  7. No inline scripts that interpolate untrusted input (${{ github.event.issue.title }} in run:) — write the value to an env var first.

Reliability

  1. Pin runner OS (ubuntu-24.04, not ubuntu-latest) for any pipeline whose stability matters.
  2. Set timeout-minutes on every job. Default 360 is a hung-runner trap.
  3. Use concurrency groups to cancel superseded runs on the same ref.
  4. Fail fast on lint/type errors before running expensive tests.
  5. Cache deterministically — lockfile-derived keys, never date-based.
  6. Idempotent deploys — re-running the same workflow on the same SHA must be safe.

Maintainability

  1. One responsibility per workflow file — ci.yml, deploy-staging.yml, release.yml. Not one mega-workflow with conditionals.
  2. Reusable workflows (workflow_call) for shared logic across repos. Composite actions for shared steps within a repo.
  3. No copy-pasted YAML across jobs — extract to a composite action or matrix.
  4. Pin action versions in one place when possible (e.g., a versions.env file or Dependabot grouping).
  5. Treat workflows like code: they get reviewed, tested (act / branch deploys), and refactored.

Cost

  1. Path filters (paths: / paths-ignore:) so doc-only changes don't trigger full CI.
  2. Cancel-in-progress for pull request runs.
  3. Right-size runners — don't put a 1-minute lint job on a 16-core runner.
  4. Cache aggressively but invalidate on lockfile changes.

References

Related skills

  • security-engineering — pipeline security review, supply-chain hardening, secret-handling rules
  • release-manager — coordinates the release itself (CHANGELOG, version tag, stakeholder comms) once the pipeline is authored
  • devops-engineer — build-system, artifact-registry, and environment-promotion mechanics beyond GitHub Actions YAML

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

Run Karpathy-style autoresearch optimization on any content. Generates 50+ variants, scores with a 5-expert simulated panel, evolves winners through multiple rounds, outputs optimized version + full experiment log. Use when optimizing landing pages, email sequences, ad copy, headlines, form pages, CTA text, or any conversion-focused content. Triggers on "optimize this page", "run autoresearch", "score these variants", "A/B test this copy".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

Tests in real browsers. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM, capture console errors, analyze network requests, profile performance, or verify visual output with real runtime data via Chrome DevTools MCP.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

Conducts multi-axis code review across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Triggers on "review my PR", "review this diff", "code review", "review this changeset", "is this ready to merge", "pre-merge review".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

Estimate the full development cost of an existing codebase from lines of code, architectural complexity, and team-composition overhead. Use for 'how much would this cost to build', 'what did this codebase cost', development-cost or build-cost estimates, calendar-time estimates, and Claude/AI ROI on a delivered codebase. Estimates by measured LOC and complexity, not by ticket volume.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

Auto-assembles a domain-specific expert panel (7–10 experts), scores any content or strategy artifact against a typed rubric, and iterates until the aggregate hits 90+ (max 3 rounds). Use as a quality gate on copy, email sequences, landing-page drafts, strategy docs, charts, titles, or recruiting evaluations — or when another skill needs a final review gate on its output. Triggers on "expert panel this", "score this", "rate these variants", "quality check this", "panel review", "expert score", "evaluate this copy/strategy/page". For variant generation and multi-round conversion optimization see autoresearch; for live-URL CRO auditing see conversion-ops; for the scripted content-production pipeline see content-pipeline.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os17Updated Jul 17, 2026

See all skills by LazyIsEfficient

Report a problem with this skill