Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

tlp-guide

Use when the user asks "what TLP should this be?", applying TLP markings to a finished product, or the tradecraft pipeline calls for TLP determination before sharing. Covers TLP v2.0 (CLEAR / GREEN / AMBER / AMBER+STRICT / RED).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Traffic Light Protocol (TLP) v2.0

Every intelligence output from this platform MUST have a TLP designation. This is enforced by platform rules and validated by hooks.

TLP Definitions

TLP:RED — Named Recipients Only

When to use: Information that would cause significant harm if shared beyond the named recipients. Sources may face risk.

  • Share with: Only the named recipients, in person or via secure channels
  • Do NOT share with: Anyone not explicitly named, even within the same organisation
  • Examples: Active zero-day exploitation details shared to a specific CISO; source-identifying intelligence; ongoing law enforcement operation details

TLP:AMBER+STRICT — Organisation Only

When to use: Information that requires support to be effectively acted upon, limited to the recipient's organisation only.

  • Share with: Members of the recipient's own organisation on a need-to-know basis
  • Do NOT share with: External parties, clients, partners, or affiliated organisations
  • Examples: Targeted threat intelligence specific to one organisation's infrastructure; internal investigation findings

TLP:AMBER — Organisation + Need-to-Know

When to use: Information that requires support to be effectively acted upon, and may be shared with clients/partners on a need-to-know basis.

  • Share with: Members of the recipient's organisation AND their clients/partners who need the information to protect themselves
  • Do NOT share with: The general public, social media, or parties without a clear need-to-know
  • Examples: Sector-specific threat briefings shared with ISAC members; IOCs for active campaigns affecting a supply chain

TLP:GREEN — Community

When to use: Information useful for awareness within a broader community but not for public disclosure.

  • Share with: The wider community (sector peers, security community) but not via publicly accessible channels
  • Do NOT share with: The general public, social media, public blogs, or news outlets
  • Examples: General threat landscape updates shared at closed conferences; new TTP descriptions shared within an ISAC

TLP:CLEAR — Unrestricted

When to use: Information that carries minimal or no foreseeable risk of misuse. Public sharing is acceptable.

  • Share with: Anyone, through any channel
  • Examples: Published CVE details, public vendor advisories, general best practices, published threat reports

Decision Tree

Is this information source-identifying or would sharing risk the source?
  → YES → TLP:RED

Would sharing beyond the recipient's org cause harm?
  → YES → Does it need to stay within a single org?
    → YES → TLP:AMBER+STRICT
    → NO (partners/clients may need it) → TLP:AMBER

Is this useful for community awareness but not public?
  → YES → TLP:GREEN

Is this safe for public consumption?
  → YES → TLP:CLEAR

Default TLP by Product Type

Product TypeDefault TLPRationale
Flash report (active incident)AMBEROften contains org-specific context
Threat actor profileGREENGeneral awareness value
Campaign reportAMBERMay contain victim-identifying information
IOC list (enriched)GREENBroadly useful for detection
Threat assessmentAMBEROften tailored to specific stakeholder
Detection rules (SIGMA/YARA/KQL)GREENBroadly useful for defence
STIX bundleGREENDesigned for automated sharing
Strategic landscape reportGREENGeneral awareness

These are defaults — always evaluate the specific content and adjust.

Implementation

In file frontmatter:

tlp: GREEN

In report headers:

TLP:GREEN — This information may be shared within the security community
but should not be published on publicly accessible channels.

Common Mistakes

  • Over-classifying (TLP:RED for everything) — reduces trust and sharing
  • Under-classifying (TLP:CLEAR for IOCs with victim context) — risks harm
  • Not including TLP at all — violates platform rules
  • Forgetting to downgrade TLP when information becomes public
  • Sharing TLP:AMBER information on public Slack channels or social media

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

AbuseIPDB API reference. IP reputation and abuse report lookups.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills27Updated Sep 30, 2026

ach

Free

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — structured technique for evaluating multiple explanations against evidence. Use when facing ambiguous attribution or multiple plausible scenarios. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Runs on ungraded evidence when asked, labelled as such, unweighted, and capped at Moderate confidence.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills27Updated Sep 30, 2026

Use when documenting a named campaign across time and victims, the user asks to start or update a campaign record, or another skill identified a multi-incident cluster that warrants formal tracking. Provides the template (timeline, attribution, victimology, attack chain, Diamond Model mapping, IOC clusters) and the lifecycle from active to historical.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills27Updated Sep 30, 2026

Use when the user asks about carding, BIN attacks, payment-card breach markets, fullz/CVV2 trade, autoshops (BidenCash, Brian's Club, Russianmarket, B1ack's Stash), or financial-fraud TTPs. Self-updating knowledge cell.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills27Updated Sep 30, 2026

Censys API v2 reference. Host reconnaissance and certificate data.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills27Updated Sep 30, 2026

Use when the user asks about Chinese state-sponsored cyber operations or specific PRC-aligned actors (APT41, Volt Typhoon, Mustang Panda, APT10, APT31, Salt Typhoon, etc.), MSS/PLA-attributed campaigns, or PRC sector targeting. Self-updating knowledge cell.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills27Updated Sep 30, 2026

See all skills by Liberty91LTD

Report a problem with this skill