Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHubEnglish overview

agent-tracing

Inspect recorded agent runs by operation ID to see failed tool calls, their arguments and results, available tools, execution context, and LLM inputs. The CLI also supports context maps and replaying recorded calls with different models for comparison.

OriginalShow the original description

Use for agent traces by operation ID (拉线上 tracing): failed tools, arguments/results, available tools, execution location, LLM calls and context.

lobehub/lobehub83,504 stars(GitHub 83,504 + cccskills 0)
Works withRedis

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Finding why an agent tool call failed
  • Checking which tools and context an operation received
  • Viewing the messages sent to an LLM
  • Comparing model responses to a frozen call

Overview

What it does

This skill uses a CLI to inspect agent execution snapshots and see what happened at each stage. Open a run by operation ID to review tool calls and results, messages sent to the LLM, runtime context, available tools, and user memory. In development, snapshots are saved under .agent-tracing/, including partial snapshots that can be examined before a run finishes. The ctx-map view shows how each LLM call’s context was assembled and which message ranges changed since the previous call. You can also replay a recorded call with another model and compare the results.

When it helps

Use it to investigate why an agent’s tool call failed or to check whether the LLM received the expected information. It can also help compare responses across models and trace which work candidates were selected during a long-running goal.

Example requests

  • “Open this operation ID and show the failed tool, its arguments, and result.”
  • “Show the messages sent to the LLM and the tools available to it.”
  • “Replay this recorded LLM call with another model so I can compare the results.”

Notes

Run the CLI from the repository root. Reading compressed snapshots requires Node 22.15 or later. Depending on how remote traces are accessed, you may need to log in to LobeHub, provide credentials, and configure TRACING_BASE_URL. Replay uses the current defaults for sampling settings that were not recorded.

This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.

Document check

AI checked the SKILL.md for operations that need care and for setup requirements. The score comes only from actually running the skill (hands-on test).

SafetyAre sending data, deleting files, and running commands disclosed?
BPartly lackingRemote access may use credentials and `TRACING_BASE_URL`, with limited handling guidance.
Easy setupDoes it need few tools or API keys, and are they documented?
BPartly lackingNode 22.15+, LobeHub login, or an environment variable may be required.

Not counted in the score. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 26, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.

Disagree? Request a re-evaluation

Tell us which point is wrong and why. No login needed. We will check it against the SKILL.md, redo the evaluation, and show the result here.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md20.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Agent Tracing CLI Guide

@lobechat/agent-tracing is a zero-config local dev tool that records agent execution snapshots to disk and provides a CLI to inspect them.

How It Works

In NODE_ENV=development, AgentRuntimeService.executeStep() automatically records each step to .agent-tracing/ as partial snapshots. When the operation completes, the partial is finalized into a complete ExecutionSnapshot JSON file.

Data flow: executeStep loop -> build StepPresentationData -> write partial snapshot to disk -> on completion, finalize to .agent-tracing/{timestamp}_{traceId}.json

Context engine capture: In RuntimeExecutors.ts, the call_llm executor calls ctx.tracingContextEngine(input, output, metadata) after serverMessagesEngine() processes messages. AgentRuntimeService.executeStep buffers the call per step and forwards it to OperationTraceRecorder.appendStep as the typed contextEngine field. CE flows through this side channel rather than the events array so its heavy payload (agentDocuments, systemRole, …) never enters the Redis state pipeline (LOBE-9110). metadata carries the pipeline's per-request decision records (trim stats, cache-warmth gates, truncation counts).

Package Location

packages/agent-tracing/
  src/
    types.ts          # ExecutionSnapshot, StepSnapshot, SnapshotSummary
    store/
      types.ts        # ISnapshotStore interface
      file-store.ts   # FileSnapshotStore (.agent-tracing/*.json)
    recorder/
      index.ts        # appendStepToPartial(), finalizeSnapshot()
    viewer/
      index.ts        # Terminal rendering: renderSnapshot, renderStepDetail, renderMessageDetail, renderSummaryTable, renderPayload, renderPayloadTools, renderMemory
    cli/
      index.ts        # CLI entry point (#!/usr/bin/env bun)
      inspect.ts      # Inspect command (default)
      partial.ts      # Partial snapshot commands (list, inspect, clean)
    index.ts          # Barrel exports

Data Storage

  • Completed snapshots: .agent-tracing/{ISO-timestamp}_{traceId-short}.json
  • Latest symlink: .agent-tracing/latest.json
  • In-progress partials: .agent-tracing/_partial/{operationId}.json
  • Downloaded remote snapshots: .agent-tracing/_remote/{operationId}.json
  • FileSnapshotStore resolves from process.cwd() — run CLI from the repo root

Remote Traces (Production / Staging)

Server deployments also upload completed snapshots to object storage (zstd-compressed; the key is stored in agent_operations.trace_s3_key).

Preferred: lh trace op. The server resolves the key and signs the object for the caller's own scope, so a LobeHub login is the only requirement — no TRACING_BASE_URL, no bucket domain, and no SQL to turn a topic id into an operation id:

lh trace op list --topic tpc_xxx # operations of a topic, newest first, with a TRACE column
lh trace op inspect op_xxx_agt_xxx_tpc_xxx_xxxx
lh trace op inspect op_xxx_agt_xxx_tpc_xxx_xxxx -T # tool injection (enabledToolIds, manifests)

TRACE = — in list means no snapshot was recorded for that run (it predates trace upload, or upload was off). A recorded snapshot can still 404 in storage after its retention window.

Backend: the agentTrace lambda router (getSnapshotUrl / listOperations). Note it is blocked for restricted API keys, so these commands need a real session, not a scoped key.

Fallback: the standalone agent-tracing CLI. It has no LobeHub session, so it builds the object URL itself and needs the bucket's public domain configured:

  • env var: TRACING_BASE_URL=https://<bucket-public-domain>/agent-traces
  • or .agent-tracing/.env in the repo root with the same TRACING_BASE_URL=... line

The deployment-specific value is private to each deployment and intentionally not recorded in this repo. Find the operation id by hand first:

SELECT id, trace_s3_key FROM agent_operations WHERE topic_id = 'tpc_xxx';

Either way the snapshot is cached to .agent-tracing/_remote/<opId>.json, and every inspect flag works the same as for local traces.

Implementation: packages/agent-tracing/src/store/loadSnapshot.ts (resolution order: local store → _remote/ cache → injected resolveDownloadUrl → TRACING_BASE_URL) and store/remote-store.ts (URL built as {base}/{agentId}/{topicId}/{opId}.json.zst). Reading a compressed snapshot needs Node >= 22.15.

Goal Trajectories

A goal is one complete goal execution the way an operation is one complete agent execution, so it gets the same trace format one level up: GoalTrajectory : AdvanceSnapshot mirrors ExecutionSnapshot : StepSnapshot. There is no table of advances, exactly as there is no agent_steps table — goal_traces holds one rollup row per goal plus the object key, and the detail lives in the object.

The leaves join back down: an advance records the operationIds it put in flight (on tick.effects[].operationId), so lh trace op inspect <opId> continues from where the goal trace stops.

agent-tracing goal               # list local goal trajectories
agent-tracing goal goal_xxx      # the run: triggers, outcomes, graph, gates, ops
agent-tracing goal goal_xxx -a 3 # one advance in full, with the frontier it ranked
agent-tracing goal goal_xxx -j   # raw JSON

What each tick records is the decision input, not just the result: the graph it read (as a delta against the previous tick), the budget it evaluated, the responsible task's state, and every eligible work node including the ones it passed over. Without the losers a trace cannot answer "why not that node".

Storage follows the operation switch, so a deployment that keeps one keeps the other:

  • Completed: goal-traces/{goalId}.json.zst
  • In progress: goal-traces/_partial/{goalId}.json.zst (an unfinished long-horizon goal is the normal thing to inspect)
  • Dev: .goal-tracing/{goalId}.json

Replay. replayGoalAgainstCurrentCoordinator(trajectory) re-runs the real decideNextMove over the recorded inputs and reports {advanceSeq, tickIndex, field, recorded, replayed} wherever the current coordinator would now choose differently. This reproduces the coordinator's decisions exactly; it says nothing about whether the dispatched work would have gone the same way.

Implementation: packages/agent-tracing/src/goal/, recorded through apps/server/src/services/goal/advanceGoal.ts (the single funnel every advance passes through) via the onDecision side channel on GoalService.tick.

CLI Commands

All commands run from the repo root:

# View latest trace (tree overview, `inspect` is the default command)
agent-tracing
agent-tracing inspect
agent-tracing inspect <traceId>
agent-tracing inspect latest

# List recent snapshots
agent-tracing list
agent-tracing list -l 20

# Inspect specific step (-s is short for --step)
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -s 0

# View messages (-m is short for --messages)
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -s 0 -m

# View full content of a specific message (by index shown in -m output)
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -s 0 --msg 2
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -s 0 --msg-input 1

# View tool call/result details (-t is short for --tools)
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -s 1 -t

# View raw events (-e is short for --events)
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -s 0 -e

# View runtime context (-c is short for --context)
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -s 0 -c

# View context engine input overview (-p is short for --payload)
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -p
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -s 0 -p

# View available tools in payload (-T is short for --payload-tools)
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -T
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -s 0 -T

# View user memory (-M is short for --memory)
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -M
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -s 0 -M

# Raw JSON output (-j is short for --json)
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -j
agent-tracing inspect <traceId> -s 0 -j

# List in-progress partial snapshots
agent-tracing partial list

# Inspect a partial (use `inspect` directly — all flags work with partial IDs)
agent-tracing inspect <partialOperationId>
agent-tracing inspect <partialOperationId> -T
agent-tracing inspect <partialOperationId> -p

# Clean up stale partial snapshots
agent-tracing partial clean

# Map the context window composition of every LLM call (cm / map are aliases)
agent-tracing ctx-map
agent-tracing ctx-map <operationId|traceId|path.json>
agent-tracing ctx-map --html            # standalone report under .agent-tracing/_reports/
agent-tracing ctx-map --html out.html

# Re-issue a recorded LLM call against other models (see "replay" below)
agent-tracing replay <operationId|traceId|path.json>
agent-tracing replay <target> -s 4 -m openai/gpt-5,anthropic/claude-sonnet-5
agent-tracing replay <target> --all-steps

replay — Re-issue a Frozen Call

A snapshot already freezes everything one LLM call saw: steps[].contextEngine.output is the exact message array sent to the model, context.payload.tools the toolset it could reach. replay sends that frozen payload back out with only the model swapped, so a difference in output is attributable to the model rather than to context assembly. If every model fails the same payload, the context is at fault; if some pass, it is model selection.

Available from both CLIs — agent-tracing replay (reads LOBEHUB_JWT) and lh trace op replay (uses the lh login session). Both need credentials because the call goes out through the LobeHub chat route.

# One call: defaults to the last call_llm step and the model the op ran on
lh trace op replay <operationId>
lh trace op replay <operationId> -s 4 -m openai/gpt-5,anthropic/claude-sonnet-5
lh trace op replay <operationId> --judge "answers with a concrete file path"

# Every call of the operation
lh trace op replay <operationId> --all-steps
lh trace op replay <operationId> --all-steps --concurrency 8

--all-steps answers the question the whole feature exists for: take a run that succeeded, put another model on it, and see whether that model also gets the job done. It ends in a PASS / FAIL verdict from an llm-rubric judge comparing the replayed outcome against the recorded one; pass --judge "<criteria>" to define success yourself instead of using the default rubric.

The judge scores the outcome, not the route. A model that solved the same problem by calling different tools has passed. The per-call tool comparison (toolSignature) is reported underneath as supporting evidence — where the run took another path — and never decides pass / fail. A final call that never reached the model is a FAIL, not a missing verdict.

Each call is replayed independently, against the payload the harness actually built for it, so a different answer at call 2 cannot contaminate call 4, a call that fails to reach the provider costs only itself, and the calls go out concurrently (4 at a time by default).

Chaining the nodes — feeding each replayed output into the next — was built and then removed. A trace cannot regenerate tool output, only hand back what was recorded, so the moment the model deviates there is no ground truth left; the run then measures nothing while still looking like it succeeded. Independent replay is the design, not a fallback.

Known limitation: sampling parameters are not recorded. The recorder stores the runtime step context under context.payload, not the provider request body, so temperature, top_p, max_tokens, penalties and reasoning config are absent from every trace written so far. Replays use the server's current defaults for those. Model-to-model comparisons stay valid (every target gets the same request); comparisons against the recorded output do not, for an operation that ran with non-default settings. --temperature / --max-tokens override explicitly. The CLI prints a note line whenever a replay is running without recorded parameters.

ctx-map — Context Window Composition

ctx-map renders one row per call_llm step: the messages that call sent to the model, split into typed segments (system / injected block / user / reasoning / tool call / tool result) with width proportional to tokens, laid against the model's context window.

The second axis is what ctx-lint cannot show: each row is diffed against the previous call, so the longest identical message prefix — the part a provider's prefix cache can reuse — is marked, along with the first message that mutated and the tokens re-processed behind it. A small injected block carrying a relative timestamp (1m ago → now) invalidates every token after it, which shows up as a break marker early in the row.

Reading a row:

  • Block colors encode role directly: orange system, green user, blue assistant, gray tool. Assistant reasoning, content, and tool calls use different steps of the same blue scale; framework-injected blocks use a lighter orange than the system prompt. Every value is a step index into a LobeHub scale vendored in viewer/contextMapScales.ts, with assignments in viewer/contextMapPalette.ts. The HTML report ships both themes and follows the system theme.
  • Neutral message frames group segments that belong to the same payload message. Every role uses the same frame color: the outline communicates structure only, while the block fill carries role and subtype semantics. The original framed layout uses padding inside each message and a small track gap between messages, keeping each payload message visually distinct.
  • Fill says whether the provider reused it: shaded ▓ (HTML: 60%-opaque hatch) was served from the prefix cache; solid █ (HTML: flat) was re-processed by the model.
  • The line under the track is the cache ledger — a bracket / green band spanning exactly the cached prefix, then the break marker (▲ in the terminal, a red rule through the track in HTML) at the column where reuse stopped, with the reason and the re-processed tokens.
FlagShortDescription
--html [path]Standalone HTML report (hover a segment for its content)
--width <n>-wTrack width in terminal columns
--window <n>Override the model context window used as the track
--full-windowAlways scale to the full window, never to the largest call
--json-jPer-call segments + cache stats

The track scales to the context window; when the window dwarfs the payloads (a 50k payload on a 1M window) it falls back to the largest call so the composition stays readable, and the header says which basis is in use. Analysis lives in analysis/contextMap.ts and is exported as buildContextMap() for downstream corpus work.

Inspect Flag Reference

FlagShortDescriptionDefault Step
--step <n>-sTarget a specific step—
--messages-mMessages context (CE input → params → LLM payload)—
--tools-tTool calls & results (what agent invoked)—
--events-eRaw events (llm_start, llm_result, etc.)—
--context-cRuntime context & payload (raw)—
--system-role-rFull system role content0
--envEnvironment context0
--payload-pContext engine input overview (model, knowledge, tools summary, memory summary, platform context)0
--payload-tools-TAvailable tools detail (plugin manifests + LLM function definitions)0
--memory-MFull user memory (persona, identity, contexts, preferences, experiences)0
--diff <n>-dDiff against step N (use with -r or --env)—
--msg <n>Full content of message N from Final LLM Payload—
--msg-input <n>Full content of message N from Context Engine Input—
--json-jOutput as JSON (combinable with any flag above)—

Flags marked "Default Step: 0" auto-select step 0 if --step is not provided. All flags support latest or omitted traceId.

Typical Debug Workflow

# 1. Trigger an agent operation in the dev UI

# 2. See the overview
agent-tracing inspect

# 3. List all traces, get traceId
agent-tracing list

# 4. Quick overview of what was fed into context engine
agent-tracing inspect -p

# 5. Inspect a specific step's messages to see what was sent to the LLM
agent-tracing inspect TRACE_ID -s 0 -m

# 6. Drill into a truncated message for full content
agent-tracing inspect TRACE_ID -s 0 --msg 2

# 7. Check available tools vs actual tool calls
agent-tracing inspect -T      # available tools
agent-tracing inspect -s 1 -t # actual tool calls & results

# 8. Inspect user memory injected into the conversation
agent-tracing inspect -M

# 9. Diff system role between steps (multi-step agents)
agent-tracing inspect TRACE_ID -r -d 2

Key Types

interface ExecutionSnapshot {
  traceId: string;
  operationId: string;
  model?: string;
  provider?: string;
  startedAt: number;
  completedAt?: number;
  completionReason?:
    'done' | 'error' | 'interrupted' | 'max_steps' | 'cost_limit' | 'waiting_for_human';
  totalSteps: number;
  totalTokens: number;
  totalCost: number;
  error?: { type: string; message: string };
  steps: StepSnapshot[];
}

interface StepSnapshot {
  stepIndex: number;
  stepType: 'call_llm' | 'call_tool';
  executionTimeMs: number;
  content?: string; // LLM output
  reasoning?: string; // Reasoning/thinking
  inputTokens?: number;
  outputTokens?: number;
  toolsCalling?: Array<{ apiName: string; identifier: string; arguments?: string }>;
  toolsResult?: Array<{
    apiName: string;
    identifier: string;
    isSuccess?: boolean;
    output?: string;
  }>;
  messages?: any[]; // DB messages before step
  context?: { phase: string; payload?: unknown; stepContext?: unknown };
  events?: Array<{ type: string; [key: string]: unknown }>;
  contextEngine?: {
    input?: unknown; // contextEngineInput minus messages + toolsConfig (reconstructible from baseline)
    output?: unknown; // processed messages array (final LLM payload)
    metadata?: unknown; // pipeline decision records (trim stats, cache gates, truncation counts)
  };
}

--messages Output Structure

When using --messages, the output shows three sections (if context engine data is available):

  1. Context Engine Input — DB messages passed to the engine, with [0], [1], ... indices. Use --msg-input N to view full content.
  2. Context Engine Params — systemRole, model, provider, knowledge, tools, userMemory, etc.
  3. Final LLM Payload — Processed messages after context engine (system date injection, user memory, history truncation, etc.), with [0], [1], ... indices. Use --msg N to view full content.

Integration Points

  • Recording: apps/server/src/services/agentRuntime/AgentRuntimeService/executeStep/index.ts — in executeStep(), after saveAndPublishStep builds stepPresentationData, writes partial snapshot in dev mode
  • Context engine capture: apps/server/src/modules/AgentRuntime/RuntimeExecutors.ts — in call_llm executor, after serverMessagesEngine() returns, calls ctx.tracingContextEngine(input, output, metadata). AgentRuntimeService.executeStep buffers it per step and passes it to traceRecorder.appendStep as the typed contextEngine field (kept off the events array to stay out of Redis state).
  • Store: FileSnapshotStore reads/writes to .agent-tracing/ relative to process.cwd()

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

acceptance

FreeSummary

Use this skill to verify a delivery by exercising the real product through a suitable surface such as a CLI, web app, desktop app, or iOS Simulator. It helps create or find a verification plan, capture evidence, and publish an acceptance report.

  • Verifying a completed product change
  • Collecting screenshots or other evidence
  • Creating a verification plan and report
lobehub/lobehub83.5KUpdated Oct 26, 2026

Use this skill to add an AI model provider to LobeHub across runtime integration, model cards, settings, branding, documentation, and acceptance checks. It also covers provider documentation updates and distinguishes new providers from models added to an existing provider.

  • Integrating a new AI model provider into LobeHub
  • Updating setup or usage documentation for a provider
  • Checking whether a model needs a new provider integration
lobehub/lobehub83.5KUpdated Oct 26, 2026

add-setting-env

FreeSummary

Use this skill to add a server-side environment variable that sets a default for a user setting. It walks through validation, server configuration and store merging, plus updating the example environment file and self-hosting documentation.

  • Adding an environment variable for a setting default
  • Wiring a new setting domain into server config
  • Documenting a new variable for self-hosting
lobehub/lobehub83.5KUpdated Oct 26, 2026

Provides guidance for registering hooks around an agent’s execution steps, tool calls, human approvals, context compression, and sub-agent calls. Hooks can observe events, supply local mock tool results, or use webhooks to allow or deny tool results under configured policies.

  • Observing agent steps and tool errors
  • Mocking tool results during local execution
  • Requiring webhook decisions before or after a tool call
lobehub/lobehub83.5KUpdated Oct 26, 2026

agent-signal

FreeSummary

Build event-driven background workflows for agents by defining sources, interpreting them as signals, and running actions through policies. It also guides asynchronous handoffs, deduplication, scoped execution, completion receipts, and observability.

  • Adding a new event source to an agent workflow
  • Routing interpreted signals to concrete background actions
  • Enqueuing work for asynchronous processing
lobehub/lobehub83.5KUpdated Oct 26, 2026

Use this skill to run end-to-end acceptance checks for bot channels in real desktop chat apps. It drives apps such as Discord, Slack, Telegram, WeChat, Lark, and QQ to send a message, wait for a response, and capture the result.

  • Checking a bot response in a real Discord channel
  • Testing chat behavior through Slack or Telegram
  • Capturing a bot interaction in a native macOS app
lobehub/lobehub83.5KUpdated Oct 26, 2026

See all skills by lobehub

Report a problem with this skill