Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when you add or change any HTTP endpoint's request or response shape (Go or Java) — implement the task's contract exactly, evolve additively, keep the OpenAPI document in sync, and detect breaking changes before hand-off
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
The API contract is a promise the web and mobile clients depend on. A silent shape change (renamed field, changed type, removed endpoint) compiles fine on the backend and breaks every consumer at runtime.
Core principle: the contract is the annotation + DTO in code. Implement the task's contract exactly, evolve it additively, and never edit a consumer yourself.
Your task's Interfaces / contract block is already copied, word for word, into the consumer tasks (the architect writes it once and copies it to the frontend and mobile tasks, which are blocked_by and deploy_depends_on yours). Implement it exactly: path, method, field names and casing, types, status codes. A shape you think is better is a comment on your task, not a change.
Consumers are not yours to edit. Find them with list_links (direction in) and grep_code for the path or field. Another component's or repository's client code belongs to its own task, and cross-repository actions are refused. Keep your change additive. When a breaking change is truly required, add_task_comment naming every consumer task or component and what each must change, and stop short of the break.
| Signal | Tooling |
|---|---|
//@Summary///@Router comments | swaggo (swag init; v1 emits Swagger 2.0 only) |
openapi.yaml/.json + generated server stubs | oapi-codegen (spec-first, go generate ./...) |
| Go struct tags driving a schema, no annotations | huma or ogen |
@Operation/@Schema on JAX-RS resources | springdoc-openapi / quarkus-smallrye-openapi — spec is generated at runtime; snapshot it at /q/openapi or /v3/api-docs |
A hand-maintained openapi.yaml with no generator | edit it directly |
Keep the document's existing OpenAPI version (3.0/3.1/3.2 all current); upgrading the spec version is never part of a feature task.
| Change | Type | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Add optional field | Additive | Safe; document it |
| Add required request field | Breaking | Coordinate via the task's contract, never edit callers yourself |
| Rename field | Breaking | Prefer add-new + deprecate-old |
| Change field type | Breaking | New field or coordinated cutover |
| Remove endpoint/field | Breaking | Deprecate first, remove later |
Diff the spec against the merge base before you finish:
mkdir -p /tmp/tt-<task key> && git show "$(git merge-base HEAD origin/HEAD)":api/openapi.yaml > /tmp/tt-<task key>/base.yaml
go run github.com/oasdiff/oasdiff@latest breaking /tmp/tt-<task key>/base.yaml api/openapi.yaml
It must print nothing unless the task is the planned break. Lint with npx --yes @redocly/cli lint api/openapi.yaml when the repo has no linter already wired in.
Request/response schema, every status code it can return (including the error shape — see api-design-conventions), and pagination parameters where the endpoint lists anything.
Task's contract: POST /tasks returns {id, title, status}. A later task wants to rename title to name for a different repository's consumer.
Wrong: rename the DTO field and ship — every client reading title breaks, and your task has no authority to touch their code.
Right (additive cutover):
name alongside title in the response; populate both. Document title as deprecated in the spec.add_task_comment naming the consumer task(s)/component(s) that must switch to name.title — remove it with a contract note.Each step keeps every consumer green and respects task boundaries.
oasdiff never run.oasdiff breaking printing output.No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the repository keeps its alerting in code, or a person asks for alerts outside TaskTrooper - PrometheusRule YAML, a Cloud Monitoring alert policy in Terraform, a Datadog monitor, each routed to TaskTrooper's alert ingest URL so it opens an incident here
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.