Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when adding a screen, a tab, a deep link, or back-navigation handling - the per-stack navigation APIs, state preservation, auth-boundary resets, and how to verify a deep link actually opens the right screen.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Navigation bugs rarely show up in a widget test — they show up as a stale back stack, a deep link that opens the wrong screen, or state from a previous session leaking past login. Use the platform's own navigation stack, not a hand-rolled one, and verify a deep link by actually following it, not by reading the routing table.
go_router (declarative routing — see flutter-setup-declarative-routing if the repo is adopting it) for stack + deep-link handling. PopScope, not the deprecated WillPopScope, to intercept back.NavigationStack(path:) + .navigationDestination(for:) for a programmatic, type-safe stack; the Tab API for top-level tab navigation.NavigationSuiteScaffold to switch a bottom nav bar to a nav rail at the ≥600dp breakpoint (see android-compose-patterns).android-compose-patterns's predictive-back section for why onBackPressed alone is no longer reliable at targetSdk 36).Don't trust the routing table — follow the link on the device and look at what opened:
# Android
adb shell am start -W -a android.intent.action.VIEW -d "<uri>" <package>
# iOS simulator
xcrun simctl openurl booted "<uri>"
Then mobile_screenshot to confirm the right screen rendered with the right data, not just that nothing crashed.
Task) as a route argument instead of its ID.WillPopScope/raw onBackPressed overrides that stop working once predictive back is the default.adb/simctl verification step in the diff or the closing message.No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the repository keeps its alerting in code, or a person asks for alerts outside TaskTrooper - PrometheusRule YAML, a Cloud Monitoring alert policy in Terraform, a Datadog monitor, each routed to TaskTrooper's alert ingest URL so it opens an incident here
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.