Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

zerolog-observability

Use when adding logging to Go code - the repository's logger with structured fields, request-scoped correlation, correct levels, no secrets or double-logging

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Structured Logging (Go)

Overview

Logs are for machines first: structured fields you can filter and correlate, not prose. The recurring defects are fmt.Println debugging left in, data interpolated into the message instead of fields, the same error logged at every layer, and secrets leaking into logs.

Core principle: log the failure at its site, with fields, once — and use the repository's own logger.

Which logger

Follow the repository's existing logger: github.com/rs/zerolog, log/slog (stdlib), or go.uber.org/zap all give structured fields and are fine to continue. Use zerolog only when the repo has no logger yet. Never introduce a second logging library alongside one the repo already uses (rule repo-conventions-win). Never fmt.Println / log.Printf in production code regardless of which structured logger the repo picked.

Rules

  • Fields, not interpolation: ids and operation names are structured fields, not baked into the message string.

  • Correlate with a request-scoped logger, not the global one. Middleware attaches request_id (and relevant entity ids) once and puts the enriched logger in the request's context; handlers and services pull it back out instead of re-adding the id everywhere:

    // middleware, once per request
    l := log.With().Str("request_id", reqID).Logger()
    c.SetUserContext(l.WithContext(c.UserContext()))
    
    // anywhere downstream
    zerolog.Ctx(ctx).Error().Err(err).Str("task_id", id.String()).Msg("dispatch failed")
    

    (slog: slog.Default().With("request_id", reqID) carried the same way via context, or a custom Handler.)

  • Handle errors once (samber "single handling rule" / Uber "Handle Errors Once"): an error is either logged OR returned/wrapped, never both. Log-and-return at every layer reports the same failure N times. Log at the site that has the most context (usually where it's finally handled, e.g. the HTTP error mapper), propagate elsewhere with %w and say nothing.

  • Never log secrets, tokens, full request bodies, or other PII that may carry user data. Treat user-supplied strings as values only — never splice them into the message template (log injection: a user-controlled newline or field name can forge log entries).

Levels

LevelUse for
Debugdevelopment detail, verbose tracing
Infostate changes worth auditing (task moved, migration applied)
Warnhandled anomaly (retry, fallback taken)
Errora failure needing attention

Worked Example

// ❌ prose message, interpolated id, will be logged again by the caller too
log.Error().Msg(fmt.Sprintf("dispatch failed for task %s: %v", id, err))

// ✅ structured fields, error attached, logged once at the handling site, request-scoped logger
zerolog.Ctx(ctx).Error().
    Err(err).
    Str("task_id", id.String()).
    Str("op", "dispatch").
    Msg("dispatch failed")
// upstream callers propagate with fmt.Errorf("dispatch: %w", err) — they do NOT re-log

Now a query like op="dispatch" level="error" finds every dispatch failure with its task id and request id, and each failure appears exactly once.

Java

Follow the repo's existing setup: SLF4J (with JBoss Logging or Logback underneath) using MDC for request_id and other correlation fields; Spring Boot's built-in structured logging (logging.structured.format.console=ecs, 3.4+); or Quarkus's quarkus-logging-json extension. The same rules apply — fields not string concatenation, handle once, never log secrets.

Common Mistakes

  • fmt.Println/log.Printf left in production paths.
  • Msg(fmt.Sprintf(...)) interpolating ids instead of .Str(...) fields.
  • The same error logged in the repo, the service, AND the handler.
  • Logging a token, password, or full request body.
  • Reading request_id from a global/package variable instead of the request-scoped context logger.
  • Everything at Info (or everything at Error) — levels lose meaning.

Red Flags

  • A message string with %s/+id inside it.
  • The same failure appears three times in the logs for one request.
  • A secret or auth header value in a log line.
  • User input spliced directly into a log message template rather than passed as a field value.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

makifbaysal/tasktrooper117Updated Oct 20, 2026

Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

makifbaysal/tasktrooper117Updated Oct 20, 2026

Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

makifbaysal/tasktrooper117Updated Oct 20, 2026

Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

makifbaysal/tasktrooper117Updated Oct 20, 2026

How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

makifbaysal/tasktrooper117Updated Oct 20, 2026

Use when the repository keeps its alerting in code, or a person asks for alerts outside TaskTrooper - PrometheusRule YAML, a Cloud Monitoring alert policy in Terraform, a Datadog monitor, each routed to TaskTrooper's alert ingest URL so it opens an incident here

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

makifbaysal/tasktrooper117Updated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by makifbaysal

Report a problem with this skill