Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

harness-engineering

Use when an agent workflow needs production-like runtime controls for context, tools, permissions, observability, scheduling, evaluation, recovery, or maintenance.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141 stars(GitHub 141 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (5)

  • SKILL.md8.5 KB
  • references/runtime-control-patterns.md4.0 KB
  • references/runtime-envelope-example.json1.8 KB
  • references/runtime-envelope-plan.md633 B
  • scripts/validate_runtime_envelope.py12.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Harness Engineering

<skill_contract> <input>An agent workflow, runtime environment, tools, data sensitivity, effects, cadence, risk, and operator constraints.</input> <output>An auditable runtime kernel with scoped permissions, scheduling, observability, recovery, and eval controls.</output> <done>An end-to-end trace and failure-path tests prove bounded, replayable, recoverable delegated action.</done> <non_goals>Business-task decomposition, prompt-only safety, broad credentials, or unbounded scheduled autonomy.</non_goals>

Treat the harness as the kernel around an LLM OS: context is RAM, durable state is disk, tools are system calls, skills are programs, the scheduler is control, and evals are verifiers. Load references/runtime-control-patterns.md for matrices and schemas. Start guarded automation from references/runtime-envelope-example.json and validate it with scripts/validate_runtime_envelope.py --strict.

Usage Template

Provide: workflow, users, agent roles, environment, tools/connections, data sensitivity, delegated actions, cadence, throughput/SLA, failure history, and risk tolerance.

Workflow

<intake>

Run the trace gate: the harness must be able to show what the agent saw, proposed, called, changed, and verified. Separate Intent Plan (human-reviewable source), Compiled Contract (validated runtime envelope), Agent (instructions/capabilities), Environment (network/files/credential broker), and Session (mounted context/events/state). Define one auditable control path for high-risk intent and final joins. Model output is never execution authority.

</intake>

<unknowns_gate>

If state ownership, credential scope, external side effects, retention, or approval authority is unclear, return NEEDS_INPUT. Probe tools with read-only discovery where possible; unknown side effects default to denied.

</unknowns_gate>

<execute>
  1. Pass Four-C: Context truth/retrieval, Connections scoped accounts/APIs, Capabilities versioned skills/scripts/evals, Cadence trigger/receipt/anomaly/stop.
  2. Compile the reviewed intent plan into a versioned runtime envelope. Validate plan hash, tool_execution_owner: host, filesystem/network/secret boundaries, output cardinality, legal no-op, budgets, approvals, audit paths, and rollback before execution.
  3. Map runtime: stored program, control unit, hot context, durable disk, event bus, I/O tools, verifier, and garbage collector.
  4. Choose the lowest-context primitive: deterministic script/hook, skill, static Graph, connector, dynamic workflow, or agent team. Load capabilities lazily. Graph Engineering owns dependency semantics; the harness owns the ready queue, leases, duplicate delivery, concurrency, and executor health.
  5. Define each tool as a narrow host-owned system call with purpose, explicit inputs, bounds, timeout, idempotency, failure path, evidence, and audit location. Validate model-proposed arguments before dispatch.
  6. Enforce zero trust and least privilege in the environment, not only prose: bind access to task, resource, operation, and time; use exact network allowlists and opaque secret handles; never expose raw credentials to model context. Stage and vet writes before external commit.
  7. Normalize each model termination_reason into complete, tool request, checkpoint/truncation, refusal/error, or unknown. The host decides whether to execute, continue, checkpoint, or escalate; success prose cannot override the control signal or verifier.
  8. For delegated action require mandate, scope, limit, preview, receipt, and rollback. Human approval governs irreversible/shared/financial/published/credentialed actions.
  9. Define allowed output types, maximum external outputs, and a verifiable NO_OP condition. Quiet execution is success only when eligibility was checked and no side effect occurred.
  10. Add deterministic feedback (tests, lint, LSP, policy checks) outside context when possible; add independent evaluator/red team for high-risk semantic output.
  11. Persist an append-only session event log and checkpoint; define alerts, fallback, incident response, cleanup, permission review, and stale-context/rule review.
  12. For scheduled work define Trigger, Context, Steering, Receipt, budget, stop, recovery, and executor health. A schedule firing is not task success.
  13. For Graph execution, persist node/edge/join transitions before releasing successors, make delivery idempotent, recover from the last verified checkpoint, and test permission denial, worker loss, duplicate events, and compensation without relying on in-memory scheduler state.
</execute> <evaluate>

Threat-model normal, denied, timeout, partial-write, stale-context, duplicate-trigger, compromised-input, evaluator-disagreement, and rollback paths. Verify permissions with actual environment boundaries and run an independent end-to-end trace. Adoption fails if operators cannot inspect or recover the system.

</evaluate>

<retry_policy>

max_attempts: 3 per tool/failure class. Retry only idempotent or compensated actions after changing diagnosis/strategy. Use exponential delay for transient dependencies. Stop on repeated signature, permission denial, ambiguous side effect, or NO_PROGRESS.

</retry_policy>

<state_contract>

Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus intent-plan hash, compiled-contract hash, agent/environment/session versions, context manifest, normalized termination reason, tool/permission/credential-lease registry, output quota, no-op receipt, event offsets, approvals, evals, alerts, recovery point, and rollback receipts. State transitions are auditable and replayable.

</state_contract>

Failure Protocol

  • NEEDS_INPUT: ownership, effect, retention, or approval authority is ambiguous.
  • BLOCKED_PERMISSION: deny the call and continue with a safer read-only path when useful.
  • BLOCKED_DEPENDENCY: checkpoint, back off, and expose executor health.
  • VERIFY_FAILED: trace, eval, guardrail, or rollback test fails; block autonomy escalation.
  • NO_PROGRESS: changed attempts repeat the signature. max_attempts: 3.
  • BUDGET_STOP: stop scheduler/workers, checkpoint, and emit a recovery receipt.

Output Contract

Return status, result (runtime architecture and controls), evidence (trace/eval/failure tests), unknowns, and next_action including approval or rollback.

Edge Cases

  • A connector exposes broad account access for a narrow task: create a scoped proxy/allowlist or keep the workflow manual; instructions alone are insufficient.
  • A model emits plausible success text with a tool request: validate and execute the tool in host code, then verify its result; do not treat the text as task completion.
  • A maintenance run finds no eligible change: emit a verified NO_OP receipt and zero external outputs rather than creating notification or PR noise.
  • The scheduler ran on time but the state store was stale: block mutation, mark the run failed, and recover from the last verified checkpoint.
  • A Graph worker completes twice after lease expiry: deduplicate by node/run identity and release successors only from one verified transition.

Success Metrics

  • Every delegated action is bounded, observable, independently verifiable, and recoverable.
  • Runtime state can be replayed across sessions without relying on chat history.
  • Autonomy level follows measured reliability and operator review capacity.

Quality Gates

  • Agent, Environment, Session, and serial control ownership are explicit.
  • Intent plan and compiled runtime envelope are hash-bound and pass strict validation.
  • Tool effects are enforced by real permissions and contracts.
  • Termination routing, secret isolation, output limits, and legal no-op are host-enforced.
  • Independent eval, approval, manual fallback, and rollback match risk.
  • Schedules have executor receipts, hard budgets, stop, and recovery.
  • Maintenance includes cleanup, permission audit, and rule half-life.

</skill_contract>

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ metrics, and control dashboards.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B creativity, experiments, and prediction-error learning.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept note.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

See all skills by Mark393295827

Report a problem with this skill