Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

project-flow-ops

Use when projects or tasks need explicit state, WIP control, ownership, definitions of done, blocker handling, and verified closure.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141 stars(GitHub 141 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Project Flow Ops

<skill_contract> <input>Project objective, tasks, owners, dependencies, budgets, artifacts, current states, and definitions of done.</input> <output>A WIP-limited project state with ranked work, explicit blockers, bounded actions, and verified closure receipts.</output> <done>Every active item has one owner and observable artifact, and completion is backed by its named fresh verification.</done> <non_goals>Hidden WIP, duplicate ownership, status by intuition, backlog accumulation, or completion without evidence.</non_goals>

Maintain a small, inspectable project state machine: BACKLOG -> ACTIVE -> BLOCKED | COMPLETED. Optimize flow and verified outcomes, not task volume.

Usage Template

Provide: project objective, current tasks, owners, dependencies, time budget, artifacts, and definition of done. Optional: prior review receipts.

Workflow

<intake>

Normalize each item into {id, objective, owner, state, artifact, definition_of_done, budget, dependencies}. Reject duplicate ownership and distinguish waiting from active execution.

</intake>

<unknowns_gate>

If an active item lacks an owner, artifact, or observable definition of done, return NEEDS_INPUT. Probe the ambiguity with the largest impact on scheduling; do not guess priority from wording alone.

</unknowns_gate>

<execute>
  1. Rank work by objective impact, urgency, dependency leverage, and cost of delay.
  2. Limit ACTIVE to one or two items per owner.
  3. Decompose the selected item until one bounded action can produce a reviewable artifact.
  4. For a blocker, record owner, missing condition, evidence, next probe, and review time; move independent work forward.
  5. Run the verification named in the definition of done.
  6. Move to COMPLETED only with a fresh receipt; otherwise keep ACTIVE or BLOCKED.
  7. At review, remove stale backlog items and state the next constraint.
</execute> <evaluate>

Check state-transition legality, WIP limits, ownership, artifact existence, and completion evidence. Use an independent check for consequential deliverables. If verification fails, reopen the item with the failure evidence and smallest corrective action.

</evaluate>

<state_contract>

Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus project objective, task ledger, dependency map, WIP count, transition history, and receipts. Transitions are append-only events; current state is derived from the latest valid event.

</state_contract>

Failure Protocol

  • NEEDS_INPUT: ownership, priority boundary, or definition of done is missing.
  • BLOCKED_DEPENDENCY: execution cannot continue; preserve the blocker contract and review time.
  • VERIFY_FAILED: the artifact fails its named check; reopen rather than relabel completion.
  • NO_PROGRESS: two reviews produce no new evidence; reduce scope, change strategy, or escalate.
  • BUDGET_STOP: stop active work, persist state, and report the highest-value next action.

Output Contract

Return status, result (project board and transition decisions), evidence (artifacts and receipts), unknowns, and next_action with owner and review time.

Edge Cases

  • Everything is marked urgent: use cost of delay and dependency leverage, then force one explicit tradeoff.
  • A task is 90% complete but verification is unavailable: keep it active or blocked; never infer the final 10%.

Success Metrics

  • Active WIP remains within the declared limit.
  • Every completed task has an artifact and fresh verification receipt.
  • Blocked work names an owner, next probe, and review time.

Quality Gates

  • Every active task has one owner and bounded budget.
  • State transitions are legal and traceable.
  • Completion evidence is fresh and objective.
  • The next constraint is explicit after each review.

</skill_contract>

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ metrics, and control dashboards.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B creativity, experiments, and prediction-error learning.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept note.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills141Updated Sep 19, 2026

See all skills by Mark393295827

Report a problem with this skill