Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

spec

Write a durable feature spec before touching code. Reads the codebase map, reads related models/migrations to ask technical questions (not generic ones), then produces a structured spec doc in docs/specs/. Designed to pipeline with /implementation --issue N. Use before any feature implementation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (4)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB
  • reference/defaults.md1.0 KB
  • templates/spec.md1.8 KB
  • workflows/brainstorm.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

/spec — Feature Specification

Trigger

/spec --issue N [--fast]
  • --issue N — required. Reads GitHub issue #N.
  • --fast — skip questions, apply defaults from reference/defaults.md, still requires user approval of the spec (hard gate).

Output

docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-{slug}-issue-{N}.md

YAML frontmatter includes issue: N so /implementation --issue N finds this file automatically.


Workflow

Step 1 — Load codebase map

ls docs/codebase/INDEX.md 2>/dev/null || echo "missing"

If exists and < 7 days old: read architecture.md + conventions.md. If missing or stale: run /map-codebase first, then proceed.

Step 2 — Read issue

gh issue view N --json title,body,labels,state

Step 3 — Brainstorm (9 stages)

See workflows/brainstorm.md.

Key principle: Stage 1 reads actual related code (models, migrations, FK patterns) before formulating questions. Questions must demonstrate codebase understanding — reference specific tables, patterns, or files found in Stage 1.

Step 4 — Write spec

Use templates/spec.md. Every column, every endpoint, every file in manifest. No placeholders. No TBD. If unknown → make it a deferred decision, explicitly.

Step 5 — Adversarial review (optional)

Ask explicitly:

"Do you want an adversarial review of this spec before committing? This spawns a Codex/Gemini reviewer that looks for: missing constraints, wrong FK assumptions, scope creep, contradictions, and security gaps."

  • Yes → run /review solve "adversarial spec review: find flaws in docs/specs/{filename}", present findings, offer to fix before commit
  • No → proceed to Step 6

Step 6 — Commit spec

git add docs/specs/{filename}
git commit -m "docs(spec): {feature slug} spec — issue #{N}"

Step 7 — Hand off

Print this block verbatim so the user can copy-paste it:

Spec committed: docs/specs/{filename}  (on main)

── Option A: implement in current session ──────────────────
  /implementation --issue {N}

── Option B: implement in a parallel worktree ──────────────
  git worktree add -b feature/{N}-{slug} ../{project}-{N} main
  # open new Claude Code session in ../{project}-{N}
  /implementation --issue {N}

── Fast mode (no questions, Codex review at end) ───────────
  /implementation --issue {N} --fast

Spec stays on main. The branch is created by worktree add or by /implementation at start. Multiple specs can be committed to main in parallel — they are docs only, no code conflicts.

Do not start implementing. Do not write any code.


References

  • workflows/brainstorm.md — 9-stage spec generation with technical question guidelines
  • reference/defaults.md — fast mode assumptions table
  • templates/spec.md — required spec document format

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Validate WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance and accessibility best practices. Use when performing accessibility audits and WCAG certification.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

matteocervelli/llms25Updated May 22, 2026

Analyze feature requirements, dependencies, and security considerations. Use when starting feature implementation from GitHub issues to understand scope, technical feasibility, and risks.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

matteocervelli/llms25Updated May 22, 2026

Run SQL queries against psql, BigQuery, or MySQL from the terminal, including natural-language-to-SQL and schema exploration. Use when analyzing data, inspecting DB state, or debugging tables. Trigger on "query the database", "SQL", "show me data from", "explore table".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

matteocervelli/llms25Updated May 22, 2026

Design REST APIs or function contracts with clear request/response specifications, error handling patterns, authentication strategies, and comprehensive documentation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

matteocervelli/llms25Updated May 22, 2026

Generate comprehensive API endpoint tests for REST and GraphQL APIs. Creates tests for all HTTP methods, status codes, authentication, and validation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

matteocervelli/llms25Updated May 22, 2026

Design component architecture and module structure using established architectural patterns for clean, maintainable, and scalable systems.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

matteocervelli/llms25Updated May 22, 2026

See all skills by matteocervelli

Report a problem with this skill