WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Create a structured feature ticket (user story, acceptance criteria, design notes) for a new user-facing feature.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Writing: read docs/skills/shared/writing-rule.md before you write a durable artifact.
Creates a structured GitHub Issue for a new feature with a user story, acceptance criteria, and design notes. Asks guided questions, shows the formatted ticket for confirmation, then creates the issue.
Read the registry path via portfolio_registry, the per-project docs dir via portfolio_projects_dir, and the ideas backlog via portfolio_ideas_backlog — all from .claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh. Source the helper at the top of any bash block that touches those paths:
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
registry=$(portfolio_registry)
Defaults match today's single-fork layout (./apexyard.projects.yaml, ./projects, ./projects/ideas-backlog.md). Adopters in split-portfolio mode override the portfolio.{registry, projects_dir, ideas_backlog} keys in .claude/project-config.json. Don't hardcode literal apexyard.projects.yaml or projects/ paths in bash blocks — the helper resolves whichever mode the adopter is in. See docs/multi-project.md.
/feature Profile picture upload
/feature Arabic language support
/feature Likes on answers
Before any gh issue create (or other tracker CLI), write this skill's name to the active-issue-skill marker so require-skill-for-issue-create.sh lets the command through. At skill entry:
# Ops root through the session pin (docs/skills/shared/ops-root.md).
ops_root=$(p="${APEXYARD_OPS_PIN_DIR:-$HOME/.claude/apexyard}/ops-root-${CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID:-}"; r=""; [ -z "${APEXYARD_OPS_DISABLE_PIN:-}" ] && [ -f "$p" ] && IFS= read -r r < "$p"; [ -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" ] || { r="$PWD"; while [ -n "$r" ] && [ ! -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" ]; do r=${r%/*}; done; }; [ -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" ] && . "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" && resolve_ops_root) && [ -n "$ops_root" ] || { echo "No ops root. See docs/skills/shared/ops-root.md." >&2; exit 1; }
mkdir -p "$ops_root/.claude/session"
marker_home="$ops_root"
. "$marker_home/.claude/hooks/_lib-session-markers.sh"
skill_marker=$(active_issue_skill_marker_path "$marker_home") || { echo "A session id is required. Restart through the harness adapter." >&2; exit 2; }
echo "feature" > "$skill_marker"
Remove the marker on every exit path (success, early-exit, user cancel, error):
marker_home="$ops_root"
. "$marker_home/.claude/hooks/_lib-session-markers.sh"
skill_marker=$(active_issue_skill_marker_path "$marker_home") || { echo "A session id is required. Restart through the harness adapter." >&2; exit 2; }
rm -f "$skill_marker"
The clear-issue-skill-marker.sh SessionStart hook clears only the current session's marker, but a clean exit should never leave one behind. See AgDR-0030.
Read the active-ticket marker of the working tree you are in to determine which repo we're working in. The marker is the apexyard-ticket file in the git dir of that tree. See /start-ticket "Read the active ticket". If no active ticket, check apexyard.projects.yaml for managed projects. If only one project, use it. If multiple, ask:
Which project is this feature for?
If no projects are registered, ask for the repo in owner/repo format.
Take the title from $ARGUMENTS. If empty, ask:
What's the feature? Give me a short title.
Ask conversationally — do NOT batch all questions. Wait for each answer before asking the next.
a) User Story
Who is this for and what do they want?
Format: As a [persona], I want [goal] so that [benefit].
If the user gives a casual answer ("users should be able to upload photos"), restructure it into the user story format and confirm.
b) Acceptance Criteria
What are the acceptance criteria? List the specific things that must be true when this is done.
(You can write them as bullet points — I'll format them as checkboxes.)
c) Design Notes
Any design notes? (screenshots, mockups, Figma links, or "no UI changes")
If the user says something like "no" or "none", use "No UI changes" as the value.
d) Priority
Priority?
1. P0 — must-have for current milestone
2. P1 — ship soon after launch
3. P2 — future / v2+
e) Out of Scope (optional)
Anything explicitly out of scope? (or press Enter to skip)
Resolve the feature body template via the portfolio helper so adopter overrides win when present:
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
template=$(portfolio_resolve_template tickets/feature.md) # → custom-templates/tickets/feature.md if present, else templates/tickets/feature.md
Single-fork adopters (no portfolio block) and adopters with no override fall straight through to templates/tickets/feature.md. Adopters who want a customised feature-body shape drop their version at <private_repo>/custom-templates/tickets/feature.md. See templates/README.md for the path-mirroring convention.
Backward-compat fallback: if portfolio_resolve_template returns empty (template file missing — partial adopter setup), fall back to the inline heredoc body below and print a one-line WARN on stderr (WARN: tickets/feature.md template missing — using inline fallback). This preserves the pre-refactor behaviour for adopters whose installations don't yet have the new template files.
Read .claude/rules/writing-standard.md before drafting. Treat the resolved template as the source of truth. Keep required sections, remove empty conditional sections, replace unknown required values with TBD, and delete the guidance comment before filing.
Substitute the gathered inputs into the resolved template (or the inline heredoc fallback), then display the full ticket using the resolved shape (the default templates/tickets/feature.md shape is reproduced below):
Here's the ticket I'll create:
---
**[Feature] {title}**
## User Story
As a {persona}, I want {goal} so that {benefit}.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {criterion 1}
- [ ] {criterion 2}
- [ ] ...
## Design Notes
{notes}
## Out of Scope
{include only when provided}
## Effort Estimate
{TBD when required and unknown}
## Glossary
| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| {term} | {definition} |
---
Labels: enhancement, {P0|P1|P2}
Repo: {owner/repo}
Create this ticket? (yes / edit / cancel)
Dispatch through tracker_create (#670 / AgDR-0072) so the issue lands in
this project's tracker (GitHub / GitLab / custom) per its tracker: block
in apexyard.projects.yaml. For a GitHub adopter this runs gh issue create
unchanged.
# Resolve + source the tracker lib (it lives in the ops fork's hooks dir).
tracker_lib="$(r="$PWD"; while [ -n "$r" ] && [ "$r" != / ]; do \
[ -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-tracker.sh" ] && { echo "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-tracker.sh"; break; }; \
r="${r%/*}"; done)"
# shellcheck source=/dev/null
. "$tracker_lib"
body_file="$(mktemp)"
cat > "$body_file" <<'BODY'
{formatted body}
BODY
# When ORBIT default planning is on, finish this Bash call here and print
# the absolute body_file path. In the next Bash call, use that LITERAL path
# in tracker_create and rm below. The PreToolUse gate must read the file
# before the create call runs; it cannot resolve a shell variable at that time.
# tracker_create <owner/repo> <title> <body_file> [<labels_csv>] → {"ref","url"}.
# Gated by require-skill-for-issue-create.sh; the step-0 marker keeps it allowed.
result="$(tracker_create "{owner/repo}" "[Feature] {title}" "$body_file" "enhancement,{priority}")"
rc=$?
rm -f "$body_file"
if [ "$rc" -eq 3 ]; then
# tracker.kind=none (shape-only): no tracker to create in. tracker_create
# printed the rendered ticket body to stdout — surface it for manual /
# external filing instead of a non-existent CLI/auth failure.
echo "Tracker is 'none' (shape-only) — nothing was created in a tracker." >&2
echo "File this in your external system (e.g. Jira/Linear via MCP):" >&2
printf '%s\n' "$result"
exit 0
elif [ "$rc" -ne 0 ] || [ -z "$result" ]; then
echo "Issue creation failed — check the tracker CLI / auth. Nothing was created." >&2
exit 1
fi
ref="$(printf '%s' "$result" | jq -r '.ref')"
url="$(printf '%s' "$result" | jq -r '.url')"
echo "Created: {owner/repo}#${ref} — {title}"
echo "${url}"
enhancement always, plus the priority label. The priority label scheme is read from .claude/project-config.*.json → .ticket.label_priority_scheme (default P0,P1,P2,P3); forks that use a different scheme (e.g. priority-p0) configure it there.[Feature] by default. The accepted prefix list is read from .claude/project-config.*.json → .ticket.prefix_whitelist; if a fork has added alternate feature-class prefixes (e.g. [Enhancement]), this skill will accept them. See apexyard#109 for the schema.Part of ApexYard — multi-project SDLC framework for Claude Code · MIT.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
WCAG 2.2 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Browse / search / show / stats AgDRs across the portfolio — recalls "have we decided this before?".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Analytics audit — SDK config, event naming, funnel completeness, dashboards. Deep-dive for /launch-check analytics.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Record per-PR architecture-review approval for design-artifact PRs (required by the architecture gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR architect "approved".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Record per-PR design-review approval (UI merge gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR designer "approved".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.