WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Update / create / reprioritise the product roadmap — add, remove, reorder milestones; renders a markdown table per milestone.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Read .claude/rules/writing-standard.md. Use the controlled technical writing profile for roadmap
artefacts: keep decisions, uncertainty, and next actions clear and concise.
Manage the product roadmap as a single durable file. The skill is intentionally low-ceremony: a roadmap is a markdown file with milestones, each containing a table of items. /roadmap reads it, edits it, and renders it.
Read the registry path via portfolio_registry, the per-project docs dir via portfolio_projects_dir, and the ideas backlog via portfolio_ideas_backlog — all from .claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh. Source the helper at the top of any bash block that touches those paths:
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
projects_dir=$(portfolio_projects_dir)
registry=$(portfolio_registry)
Defaults match today's single-fork layout (./apexyard.projects.yaml, ./projects, ./projects/ideas-backlog.md). Adopters in split-portfolio mode override the portfolio.{registry, projects_dir, ideas_backlog} keys in .claude/project-config.json. Don't hardcode literal apexyard.projects.yaml or projects/ paths in bash blocks — the helper resolves whichever mode the adopter is in. See docs/multi-project.md.
Write targets (see me2resh/apexyard#373 + #443): paths documented as projects/<name>/X in this skill are canonical adopter-facing forms — implement them in bash as "${projects_dir}/<name>/X". Never construct from "${PWD}/projects/...", "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/projects/...", or a literal ./projects/... — those break in split-portfolio v2 mode where projects_dir resolves to a sibling repo.
REQUIRED per-block preamble (see #443): Claude executes each bash block as a separate shell invocation. The projects_dir assignment from the Path resolution section above does NOT carry into later blocks. Every bash block that writes to a projects/<name>/X path MUST start with this three-line preamble so it's self-contained:
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
projects_dir=$(portfolio_projects_dir)
# ... now write to "${projects_dir}/<name>/X"
The Path resolution section's example sources the helper once for documentation purposes; it does not absolve later blocks from sourcing it themselves. Treat each bash fence as a fresh process.
When /roadmap runs, activate the Head of Product role — they own roadmap prioritisation, strategic sequencing, and milestone decisions. For adding a specific item with a PRD, chain to /write-spec which activates the Product Manager instead. For items that require data-driven reprioritisation, involve the Product Analyst.
See .claude/rules/role-triggers.md for the full activation protocol.
/roadmap # show current roadmap
/roadmap add "OAuth login" Q3 P0 # add an item to a milestone
/roadmap remove "OAuth login" # remove an item
/roadmap reorder # interactive reordering
/roadmap show Q3 # show a single milestone
Every roadmap lives at projects/<name>/roadmap.md inside your ops repo, where <name> matches an entry in apexyard.projects.yaml. Without --project, the skill asks which project's roadmap to operate on, listing the registry.
# Product Roadmap
> Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD
> Owner: @octocat
## Now (current cycle)
| ID | Item | Priority | Status | Owner | Notes |
|----|------|----------|--------|-------|-------|
| RM-001 | CSV export | P0 | in-progress | @alice | GH#42 |
| RM-002 | OAuth login | P0 | not-started | @bob | depends on AgDR-0007 |
## Next (1-3 cycles out)
| ID | Item | Priority | Status | Owner | Notes |
|----|------|----------|--------|-------|-------|
| RM-003 | Multi-currency | P1 | not-started | – | |
## Later (3+ cycles out)
| ID | Item | Priority | Status | Owner | Notes |
|----|------|----------|--------|-------|-------|
## Done
| ID | Item | Shipped | PR |
|----|------|---------|-----|
| RM-000 | Health endpoint | 2026-04-05 | #41 |
The default milestones are Now / Next / Later / Done (Now-Next-Later format). Custom milestones (Q1/Q2/Q3 or v1.0/v1.1/v2.0) are also accepted.
Read the roadmap file
Render each non-empty milestone as a table
Print a footer summary:
12 items · 5 in Now · 4 in Next · 3 in Later · 8 Done
<item> <milestone> <priority>RM-NNN IDStatus: not-started, Owner: –Last updated date<item-or-id>2,1,3,4)<id> <new-milestone><id>Shipped date and PR column reference (ask user for PR # if it can't be inferred)If the user passes --with-issues, also create or update tracker issues to
mirror the roadmap. Dispatch through tracker_create (#670 / AgDR-0072,
extended by the #709 creator sweep) so the issues land in this project's
tracker — GitHub, GitLab, or a custom CLI. For a GitHub adopter this runs
gh issue create exactly as before.
tracker_create's first argument is a concrete owner/repo slug — it is not
resolved for you. Determine it once, before the loop, the same way the other
creator skills (/feature, /bug, /task) do:
Read the active-ticket marker of the working tree you are in to determine which repo we're working in. The marker is the apexyard-ticket file in the git dir of that tree. See /start-ticket "Read the active ticket".
If no active ticket, check apexyard.projects.yaml for managed projects. If only
one project, use it. If multiple, ask:
Which project should the roadmap issues be filed in?
If no projects are registered, ask for the repo in owner/repo format. Pass the
resolved value (e.g. me2resh/apexyard) as the first tracker_create argument —
never the literal {owner/repo} placeholder.
# Resolve + source the tracker lib once (before the loop) by walking up from cwd.
tracker_lib="$(r="$PWD"; while [ -n "$r" ] && [ "$r" != / ]; do \
[ -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-tracker.sh" ] && { echo "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-tracker.sh"; break; }; \
r="${r%/*}"; done)"
# shellcheck source=/dev/null
. "$tracker_lib"
# owner_repo is the value resolved above (e.g. me2resh/apexyard), NOT a literal.
owner_repo="{resolved owner/repo}"
# For each item in Now and Next without a GH link in Notes:
body_file="$(mktemp)"
printf 'Tracking issue for roadmap item %s\n' "{RM-NNN}" > "$body_file"
result="$(tracker_create "$owner_repo" "[Roadmap] {item}" "$body_file" "roadmap,{priority}")"
rc=$?
rm -f "$body_file"
if [ "$rc" -eq 3 ]; then
# tracker.kind=none (shape-only): no tracker to create in. tracker_create
# printed the rendered ticket body to stdout — surface it for manual /
# external filing and skip the Notes back-write.
echo "Tracker is 'none' (shape-only) — nothing was created in a tracker." >&2
printf '%s\n' "$result"
elif [ "$rc" -eq 0 ] && [ -n "$result" ]; then
ref="$(printf '%s' "$result" | jq -r '.ref')"
# write ${ref} back into the item's Notes column
else
echo "Issue creation failed for '{item}' — check the tracker CLI / auth." >&2
fi
Then write the issue reference (${ref}) back into the Notes column (only on the
rc -eq 0 path above — the kind=none and failure paths leave Notes untouched).
ROADMAP — example-app — last updated 2026-04-06
================================================
NOW (current cycle)
| ID | Item | Priority | Status | Owner | Notes |
|--------|-----------------|----------|-------------|--------|----------------------|
| RM-001 | CSV export | P0 | in-progress | @alice | GH#42 |
| RM-002 | OAuth login | P0 | not-started | @bob | depends on AgDR-0007 |
NEXT (1–3 cycles out)
| ID | Item | Priority | Status | Owner | Notes |
|--------|-----------------|----------|-------------|-------|-------|
| RM-003 | Multi-currency | P1 | not-started | – | |
LATER
(empty)
DONE (last 5)
| ID | Item | Shipped | PR |
|--------|-----------------|------------|-----|
| RM-000 | Health endpoint | 2026-04-05 | #41 |
Summary: 3 active · 0 later · 1 done
Owner: @octocat
| Priority | Meaning |
|---|---|
| P0 | Must ship in current cycle |
| P1 | Should ship soon |
| P2 | Nice to have |
| P3 | Speculative |
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| not-started | No work yet |
| in-progress | Active work, branch/PR exists |
| blocked | Waiting on something — note in Notes column |
| in-review | PR open, awaiting review |
| done | Shipped (auto-moves to Done milestone) |
RM-001 never changes once assignedLast updated on every writeremove, reorder ask firstprojects/<name>/roadmap.md in the ops repo--with-issues is opt-in/write-spec — once a roadmap item is approved, write its PRD/stakeholder-update — pulls "Now" and "Done" sections to summarise progress/idea — for ideas not yet on the roadmapPart of ApexYard — multi-project SDLC framework for Claude Code · MIT.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
WCAG 2.2 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Browse / search / show / stats AgDRs across the portfolio — recalls "have we decided this before?".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Analytics audit — SDK config, event naming, funnel completeness, dashboards. Deep-dive for /launch-check analytics.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Record per-PR architecture-review approval for design-artifact PRs (required by the architecture gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR architect "approved".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Record per-PR design-review approval (UI merge gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR designer "approved".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.