Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

write-spec

Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when creating product requirements documents.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

me2resh/apexyard538 stars(GitHub 538 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

/write-spec — Feature Specification

Writing: read docs/skills/shared/writing-rule.md before you write a durable artifact.

Write a feature specification or product requirements document (PRD).

Activated role

When /write-spec runs, activate the Product Manager role — they own PRD creation, user stories, and acceptance criteria. For roadmap-level prioritisation calls, escalate to the Head of Product.

Design-heavy features should also involve the UX Designer (for user flows) and the UI Designer (for component specs) once the PRD has a problem statement. Technical feasibility review happens at the Tech Design phase, not here — the /write-spec output hands off to the Tech Lead who activates for Phase 2.

See .claude/rules/role-triggers.md for the full activation protocol.

Usage

/write-spec SSO support for enterprise
/write-spec Users want to export data as CSV
/write-spec We need better onboarding

Workflow

1. Understand the Feature

Accept any of: a feature name, a problem statement, a user request, or a vague idea.

2. Gather Context

Ask conversationally:

  • User problem — what problem does this solve? Who experiences it?
  • Target users — which user segment(s)?
  • Success metrics — how will we know this worked?
  • Constraints — technical, timeline, dependencies?
  • Prior art — has this been attempted before?

3. Pull Context from Connected Tools

If the project has integrations available:

  • GitHub Issues (the default tracker) — search for related issues, epics, or features in the project's repo. Teams using other trackers (Linear, Jira) can substitute the equivalent search.
  • Notion / Confluence — search for related research, specs, or design docs
  • Figma — pull related mockups or wireframes

4. Generate the PRD

Resolve the PRD template via the portfolio helper so adopter overrides win when present:

source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
template=$(portfolio_resolve_template prd.md)   # → custom-templates/prd.md if present, else templates/prd.md

Single-fork adopters (no portfolio block) and adopters with no override fall straight through to templates/prd.md. Adopters who want a customised PRD shape drop their version at <private_repo>/custom-templates/prd.md. See templates/README.md for the path-mirroring convention.

Read .claude/rules/writing-standard.md before drafting. Treat the resolved template as the source of truth: keep required sections, remove empty conditional sections, replace unknown required values with TBD, and delete the guidance comment before filing.

The PRD should include:

# {Feature Name} — PRD

## Problem Statement
## Goals
   3–5 specific, measurable outcomes

## Non-Goals
   3–5 things explicitly out of scope

## User Stories
   As a [user type], I want [capability] so that [benefit]

## Requirements
### Must-Have (P0)
### Nice-to-Have (P1)
### Future (P2)

## Success Metrics
### Leading Indicators (days–weeks)
### Lagging Indicators (weeks–months)

## Open Questions
## Timeline

The list above is illustrative. Use the resolved template's Required and Conditional guidance. Do not add an empty conditional section only because it appears in this example.

5. Review and Iterate

After generating the draft: ask if sections need adjustment, offer follow-ups.

6. Create the Tracking Ticket

Offer to create an epic / feature ticket in the team's tracker with the PRD content.


Part of ApexYard — multi-project SDLC framework for Claude Code · MIT.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

me2resh/apexyard538Updated Oct 26, 2026

WCAG 2.2 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

me2resh/apexyard538Updated Oct 26, 2026

agdr

Free

Browse / search / show / stats AgDRs across the portfolio — recalls "have we decided this before?".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

me2resh/apexyard538Updated Oct 26, 2026

Analytics audit — SDK config, event naming, funnel completeness, dashboards. Deep-dive for /launch-check analytics.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

me2resh/apexyard538Updated Oct 26, 2026

Record per-PR architecture-review approval for design-artifact PRs (required by the architecture gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR architect "approved".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

me2resh/apexyard538Updated Oct 26, 2026

Record per-PR design-review approval (UI merge gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR designer "approved".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

me2resh/apexyard538Updated Oct 26, 2026

See all skills by me2resh

Report a problem with this skill