Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

thermos

Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel, then synthesize their findings. Use for thermos, double thermo review, or combined bug/security and code-quality branch audits.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md1.8 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Thermos

On Codex, read the platform mapping, including its per-skill notes, before following this skill.

On GitHub Copilot, read the platform mapping, including its per-skill notes, before following this skill.

Run the two thermo review passes as async background subagents in parallel, then synthesize their results.

Workflow

  1. Determine the review scope from the user request, PR, current branch, or relevant changed files.
  2. Gather the diff and any file/context excerpts needed for reviewers to evaluate the change without guessing.
  3. Launch both subagents in the same message with run_in_background: true:
    • subagent_type: "pstack:thermo-nuclear-review-subagent" for bugs, breakages, security, devex regressions, feature-flag leaks, and other branch-audit risks.
    • subagent_type: "pstack:thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent" for maintainability, structure, file-size growth, spaghetti, abstractions, and codebase-health risks.
  4. Pass each subagent the same scoped diff/file context and ask it to return prioritized findings with file references and evidence.
  5. After both finish, synthesize the results with findings first, deduplicated across reviewers. Weight overlapping findings more heavily, resolve disagreements with your own judgment, and keep summaries brief.

If individual background summaries are already visible to the user, do not restate them wholesale. Surface the unified verdict, the highest-signal findings, and any remaining uncertainty.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in. Use for /architect, 'architect this', 'design this', or non-trivial work where jumping to code would lock in the wrong shape.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude3KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

arena

Free

Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude3KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Use for "automate me", "create/update/refresh my -mode skill", "turn/capture my preferences or working style into a skill", or wanting agents to follow how the user works. Drafts or revises a personal -mode skill via plugin-dev:skill-development + unslop, optionally pulling fresh evidence from recent transcripts.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude3KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Watch an open PR — fix failing CI, handle the straightforward review comments, and drive it to a mergeable state. Claude Code analog of Cursor's built-in /babysit. Use after opening a PR when the user wants the agent to shepherd it without re-prompting.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude3KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Vet a perf measurement (limiter, tuning, limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and whether the work happened) before you report or act on it. Use when you run a benchmark or report a speedup or regression you measured.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude3KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', reviewing a small diff you don't trust, or a brief that asserts something about existing code ('make X public', 'X already handles Y') before you design against that assertion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude3KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

See all skills by michael-denyer

Report a problem with this skill