Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

acceptance-test-driven-development

Write acceptance tests before unit tests to ensure you're building the right thing

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Acceptance Test-Driven Development (ATDD)

Workflow

ATDD extends TDD by adding an outer acceptance test loop:

  1. Write an acceptance test that describes the desired behavior from the user's perspective
  2. Run it — it should fail (the feature doesn't exist yet)
  3. Enter the TDD inner loop:
    • Write a failing unit test (RED)
    • Write minimal code to pass (GREEN)
    • Refactor (REFACTOR)
    • Repeat until the acceptance test passes
  4. Verify the acceptance test passes — the feature is complete

Acceptance Test Patterns

Acceptance tests should be named with these patterns:

  • *.acceptance.test.ts — acceptance/integration tests
  • *.e2e.test.ts — end-to-end tests

Key Principles

  • Acceptance tests describe WHAT, not HOW — they test observable behavior
  • Unit tests describe HOW — they test internal mechanics
  • Write acceptance tests in the language of the user/stakeholder
  • One acceptance test per user story or feature
  • Multiple unit tests per acceptance test — the inner TDD loop

Example Workflow

Feature: User registration

1. Write acceptance test: user-registration.acceptance.test.ts
   - Test: "User can register with email and password"
   - Test: "Registration fails with duplicate email"
   - Run → FAIL (no registration endpoint)

2. TDD inner loop:
   a. Unit test: validate-email.test.ts → RED → implement → GREEN
   b. Unit test: hash-password.test.ts → RED → implement → GREEN
   c. Unit test: create-user.test.ts → RED → implement → GREEN
   d. Unit test: registration-handler.test.ts → RED → implement → GREEN

3. Run acceptance test → PASS → Feature complete!

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • ❌ Writing unit tests without an acceptance test that frames the feature
  • ❌ Writing acceptance tests that test implementation details
  • ❌ Skipping the acceptance test because "it's a small feature"
  • ❌ Writing all acceptance tests upfront (write them one feature at a time)

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Master backend architectures, REST API design, microservices, and server-side development across multiple languages. Use this as a central index to access specialized sub-skills.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

MikeCheng1208/BattleTree2Updated Jul 22, 2026

在每次回复中使用固定前缀并列出本次实际参考的指令/文件,便于校验是否遵循上下文与规则。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

MikeCheng1208/BattleTree2Updated Jul 22, 2026

Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

MikeCheng1208/BattleTree2Updated Jul 22, 2026

Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

MikeCheng1208/BattleTree2Updated Jul 22, 2026

Arquitecto de Soluciones Principal y Consultor Tecnológico de Andru.ia. Diagnostica y traza la hoja de ruta óptima para proyectos de IA en español.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

MikeCheng1208/BattleTree2Updated Jul 22, 2026

[00] META. Orchestrate skills into dynamic chains for complex tasks. Analyzes the task, discovers available skills, builds an optimal chain, explains why each skill is needed, and executes step-by-step with user confirmation. Use for any complex task requiring multiple thinking/research/analysis steps. Triggers on "plan this", "how to approach", "what's the strategy", "build a plan", or any multi-step problem requiring skill orchestration.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

MikeCheng1208/BattleTree2Updated Jul 22, 2026

See all skills by MikeCheng1208

Report a problem with this skill