Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

candidate-scorecard

Turn interview notes into a structured candidate scorecard and hire recommendation. Use when asked to write an interview scorecard, a candidate evaluation, an interview debrief, or to summarize feedback into a hire/no-hire call. Produces a per-competency assessment with evidence and ratings, an overall recommendation with confidence, and the open questions for the next round — evidence-based, bias-aware, and decision-ready.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Candidate Scorecard Skill

A scorecard converts a fuzzy "I liked them" into an evidence-based, comparable evaluation. It rates the candidate against the same competencies the role defined, ties each rating to specific evidence from the interview, and lands a clear recommendation — so debriefs are about evidence, not who argues hardest. (For the role's question set and competencies, pair with interview-question-bank.)

Working from a brief

Given rough interview notes, produce the full scorecard anyway — organize the evidence under the relevant competencies and give a rating + recommendation, marking where evidence is thin (low confidence / probe next round). Never invent things the candidate said; if a competency wasn't assessed, say so rather than guessing.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided (else mark as not assessed):

  • The role & competencies — what's being assessed (or use the role's interview kit).
  • Interview notes — what the candidate said/did, ideally with examples.
  • The interview scope — which round/competencies this interviewer covered.
  • Scale — the rating scale to use (e.g. 1–4: strong no / no / yes / strong yes).

Output Format

Candidate Scorecard: [name] — [role]

  • Summary — one-line read: overall rating and the headline reason.
  • Per-competency assessment — for each competency assessed:
CompetencyRatingEvidence (what they said/did)Concern / gap

Mark any competency you couldn't assess as Not assessed.

  • Strengths — the 2–3 clearest, evidence-backed.
  • Risks / gaps — the real concerns, with the evidence (not vibes).
  • Open questions for next round — what to probe to resolve uncertainty.
  • Recommendation — Hire / No hire / Lean yes / Lean no, with a confidence level and the one-sentence rationale.

Quality Checks

  • Every rating is tied to specific evidence from the interview, not impressions
  • Competencies not actually assessed are marked "Not assessed", not guessed
  • Strengths and risks are concrete and balanced — not a one-sided narrative
  • The recommendation states a confidence level and what would change it
  • Open questions hand the next interviewer something specific to probe
  • No invented quotes/claims; bias-prone "culture fit" is replaced with job-related evidence

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not rate on overall vibe — anchor each score to what the candidate actually demonstrated
  • Do not invent or embellish what they said to justify a rating
  • Do not score competencies you didn't test — flag them for the next round
  • Do not hide low confidence behind a confident-sounding verdict — say how sure you are
  • Do not lean on "culture fit" as a reason — name the specific, job-related concern

Based On

Structured-hiring practice — competency ratings anchored to evidence, calibrated recommendations with confidence, and bias-aware, decision-ready debriefs.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Write an interview scorecard."
  • "Turn my interview notes into a candidate evaluation."
  • "Run the interview debrief."
  • "Summarise the feedback into a hire or no-hire call."

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

360-feedback-template

Free

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

401k-plan-decoder

Free

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

ab-test-planner

Free

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

ab-test-readout

Free

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

academic-cv

Free

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

accessibility-audit

Free

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by mohitagw15856

Report a problem with this skill