Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

change-management-plan

Create a structured change management plan for any organisational change. Use when asked to write a change management plan, manage a change initiative, plan a system rollout, or lead an organisational transformation. Produces a plan covering stakeholder analysis, impact assessment, communication strategy, and resistance management.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md6.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Change Management Plan Skill

Produces a structured change management plan — because most change initiatives fail not because the change is wrong, but because people aren't brought along with it.

Required Inputs

Work from what is given. If any of these is missing, still produce the complete output: fill each gap with a reasonable assumption marked (assumed, confirm) and list those assumptions at the end. Ask a question first only when the core subject itself is missing (there is nothing to write about).

  • The change (what is changing, and what is the current state?)
  • Scale (how many people affected, in how many teams/locations?)
  • Timeline (when does the change go live? How long is the transition?)
  • Sponsor (who is accountable at senior level?)
  • Key concern (what is the biggest risk to adoption?)
  • What happens if change fails (consequences of low adoption)

Output Structure


Change Management Plan: [Change Name]

Change sponsor: [Executive owner] Change manager: [Who is running this] Go-live date: [Date] Affected population: [N people, N teams/locations]


1. Change Summary

From (current state): [Specific description of today's situation] To (future state): [Specific description of what changes] Why this change is happening: [Honest explanation — people adopt change faster when they understand the real reason] What stays the same: [Explicitly naming what is NOT changing reduces anxiety]


2. Stakeholder Analysis

Stakeholder groupSizeImpact levelCurrent sentimentWhat they need
[Group][N]High/Med/LowSupportive / Neutral / Resistant[Specific concern or need]

Key influencers to engage early: [Name the informal leaders, respected voices, and early adopters who can help. And the resistors who need direct attention.]


3. Impact Assessment

AreaImpactSeverityAction needed
Daily workflow[What changes day-to-day]High/Med/Low[Training / support / redesign]
Systems or tools[What tools are affected]
Roles and responsibilities[Any role changes]
Processes[Process changes]
Metrics and targets[Any KPI changes]

4. Communication Plan

Core message: [The 1-sentence summary everyone should understand and remember]

AudienceMessage focusChannelTimingOwner
All staff[Why this is happening + what to expect]All-hands / Email[T-6 weeks]Sponsor
Managers[How to support their teams]Manager briefing[T-5 weeks]Change manager
Directly affected teams[What changes for them specifically]Team meeting[T-4 weeks]Line manager
[Other group][Tailored message]

Communication principles:

  • Over-communicate — people need to hear a message 7 times to internalise it
  • Use managers to cascade, not just top-down announcements
  • Create a feedback channel — questions left unanswered become rumours

5. Training and Support Plan

AudienceTraining typeTimingDurationDeliveryOwner
[Group][e.g. Hands-on system training][T-2 weeks][2 hours][In-person / online][Owner]

Go-live support:

  • [What support is available on day 1 — helpdesk, floor walkers, champions]
  • [Escalation path for issues in first 30 days]

6. Resistance Management

Anticipated resistance sources:

ConcernWho holds itRoot causeResponse
[e.g. "This will increase my workload"][Middle managers][Loss of autonomy][Specific action to address]

Resistance management principles:

  • Acknowledge concerns genuinely — dismissing resistance amplifies it
  • Involve resistors in design where possible — converts them into advocates
  • Distinguish between genuine concerns (worth addressing) and preference for the status quo (to be managed, not solved)

7. Adoption Metrics

MetricBaselineTargetMeasurement pointOwner
[System usage rate][0%][80%][30 days post go-live][Owner]
[Process compliance][X%][Y%][60 days][Owner]
[Staff confidence score][Survey score][Target][90 days][Owner]

Adoption milestones:

  • D+7: [First check — early issues identified]
  • D+30: [First adoption review]
  • D+90: [Sustained adoption confirmed or remediation plan activated]

Quality Checks

  • "What stays the same" is explicitly addressed
  • Stakeholder analysis includes resistors, not just supporters
  • Communication plan uses managers to cascade (not just top-down)
  • Training is timed before go-live (not after)
  • Adoption metrics have a measurement date and owner
  • Resistance management has specific responses (not just "communicate more")

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not treat communication as a one-time announcement — people need to hear a message multiple times before they internalise it; plan for repeated touchpoints
  • Do not assign change management to a single owner without involving line managers — managers are the most effective cascade channel and must be briefed before their teams
  • Do not schedule training after go-live — people who learn a new system on the day they need to use it will revert to the old process
  • Do not ignore resistors in the stakeholder analysis — resistors who are not explicitly engaged will undermine adoption, especially informal leaders
  • Do not measure adoption only at go-live — the real test is sustained adoption at 90 days, when novelty has worn off

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Write a change management plan for [initiative]"
  • "Help me plan the rollout of [system change] for [team/org]"
  • "Create a communication and training plan for [change]"
  • "How do I manage resistance to [change]?"

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by mohitagw15856

Report a problem with this skill