Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

counteroffer-decoder

Decode a counteroffer after you resign — what the raise, promotion promise, or title bump really signals, the statistics-informed risks of staying, and a clear-eyed decision framework. Use when asked my company countered my resignation, should I accept a counteroffer, they offered me more to stay, or decode this retention offer. Produces a component-by-component decode with 🔴🟡🟢 severity, the questions that expose which promises are real, and the stay/go decision sheet.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md5.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Counteroffer Decoder Skill

A counteroffer is the price of your replacement, quoted in a panic. Sometimes it's also a genuine correction — a manager discovering what the market already knew. This skill decodes which one is on the table: what each component (cash now, promises later, title without scope) actually signals, what changes the day you accept, and the questions whose answers separate real commitments from retention theater.

What This Skill Produces

  • Component-by-component decode — each element of the offer, what it signals, 🔴🟡🟢 severity
  • The day-after analysis — what accepting changes about trust, the promotion queue, and the next layoff list, stated as risks not prophecies
  • The verification questions — the asks that convert promises into commitments (in writing, with dates) or expose them
  • The decision sheet — stay/go framed against why they resigned in the first place

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The counteroffer's exact contents — verbal or written; note which is which (it matters enormously)
  • Why they resigned — money, growth, manager, mission, the new opportunity itself; the counter can only fix some of these
  • The new offer they'd be declining — what gets given up if they stay
  • History — had they raised these issues before? A raise that took a resignation is data about the next raise

Framework: Severity Scale

  • 🔴 Retention theater — high risk — verbal-only promises ("promotion in the next cycle"), title bump with unchanged scope/pay path, "we were already planning to promote you" with no paper trail, urgency pressure ("we need your answer today"), a raise to exactly-match with visible resentment. Each signals buying time to de-risk their transition, not correcting yours.
  • 🟡 Ambiguous — verify before weighing — real raise but silent on the original non-money reasons, promises with names but no dates, "things will change" about a manager or culture (ask: what specifically, starting when, visible how?).
  • 🟢 Genuine-correction signals — written offer unprompted, addresses the stated reasons not just comp, concrete scope change with a start date, no urgency pressure, acknowledgment that the situation was mishandled. Rare, and worth taking seriously when the pattern is complete.

Decode against the resignation reason: money-only resignations are the only kind a counteroffer can fully fix. Growth, manager, and mission problems survive a raise — the counter resets the salary and keeps the reason.

Output Format

Counteroffer Decode: [current role vs. new offer]

The Verdict

[Genuine correction / retention theater / mixed — in two sentences, with the single strongest signal either way]

Component Decode

ComponentWhat was offeredWhat it signalsSeverity

The Day After You Accept

[Trust and flight-risk labeling, framed as risk-not-certainty · the promotion-queue question · what happens to leverage once the new offer expires]

Verification Questions (before deciding)

[3–5 asks that convert each 🟡 promise to writing-with-dates, and the polite phrasing — "could we document the scope change so it survives reorgs?"]

Decision Sheet

[The original resignation reason → does the counter fix it? · what's given up from the new offer · the honest recommendation with reasoning]

A career-decision reading, not financial or legal advice — equity, bonus, and notice terms in either offer are worth a professional's eyes before signing.

Quality Checks

  • Every component decoded against what it signals, not just its face value
  • The original resignation reason anchors the analysis throughout
  • Day-after risks stated as risks with reasoning, never as certainties or folklore statistics
  • Every promise has a verification question that would convert it to writing
  • The decision sheet takes a position with reasoning

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not cite "80% of counteroffer-acceptors leave within a year" folklore as fact — the honest version is the mechanism (unfixed reasons resurface), not a fake number
  • Do not treat every counter as an insult — genuine corrections exist; decode, don't preach
  • Do not let the flattery of being countered into the analysis — the offer prices your replacement cost, and it's the terms that carry information
  • Do not weigh verbal promises as offer components — until written, they're 🔴 and weigh nothing
  • Do not decide on comp alone when the resignation wasn't about comp — say so plainly

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "My company countered my resignation."
  • "Should I accept a counteroffer?"
  • "Decode this retention offer."

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

See all skills by mohitagw15856

Report a problem with this skill