Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

analyzing-threat-intelligence-feeds

Analyze threat intelligence feeds to extract indicators of compromise, observable clues of possible attacks, and their campaign context. Assess source quality, standardize formats, remove duplicates, and enrich indicators for distribution to security monitoring systems.

OriginalShow the original description

Analyzes structured and unstructured threat intelligence feeds to extract actionable indicators, adversary tactics, and campaign context. Use when ingesting commercial or open-source CTI feeds, evaluating feed quality, normalizing data into STIX 2.1 format, or enriching existing IOCs with campaign attribution. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage, MISP, AlienVault OTX, or automated feed aggregation pipelines.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Assessing the quality and relevance of threat intelligence feeds
  • Standardizing indicators into STIX 2.1
  • Removing duplicates and adding attack campaign context
  • Distributing enriched indicators to security monitoring systems

Files included (4)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md2.3 KB
  • scripts/agent.py6.8 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Analyzing Threat Intelligence Feeds

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Ingesting new commercial or OSINT threat feeds and assessing their signal-to-noise ratio
  • Normalizing heterogeneous IOC formats (STIX 2.1, OpenIOC, YARA, Sigma) into a unified schema
  • Evaluating feed freshness, fidelity, and relevance to the organization's threat profile
  • Building automated enrichment pipelines that correlate IOCs against SIEM events

Do not use this skill for raw packet capture analysis or live incident triage without first establishing a CTI baseline.

Prerequisites

  • Access to a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) such as ThreatConnect, MISP, or OpenCTI
  • API keys for at least one commercial feed (Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage, or VirusTotal Enterprise)
  • TAXII 2.1 client library (taxii2-client Python package or equivalent)
  • Role with read/write permissions to the TIP's indicator database

Workflow

Step 1: Enumerate and Prioritize Feed Sources

List all available feeds categorized by type (commercial, government, ISAC, OSINT):

  • Commercial: Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence
  • Government: CISA AIS (Automated Indicator Sharing), FBI InfraGard, MS-ISAC
  • OSINT: AlienVault OTX, Abuse.ch, PhishTank, Emerging Threats

Score each feed on: update frequency, historical accuracy rate, coverage of your sector, and attribution depth. Use a weighted scoring matrix with criteria from NIST SP 800-150 (Guide to Cyber Threat Information Sharing).

Step 2: Ingest via TAXII 2.1 or API

For TAXII-enabled feeds:

taxii2-client discover https://feed.example.com/taxii/
taxii2-client get-collection --collection-id <id> --since 2024-01-01

For REST API feeds (e.g., Recorded Future):

  • Query /v2/indicator/search with risk_score_min=65 to filter low-confidence IOCs
  • Apply rate limiting and exponential backoff for API resilience

Step 3: Normalize to STIX 2.1

Convert each IOC to STIX 2.1 objects using the OASIS standard schema:

  • IP address → indicator object with pattern: "[ipv4-addr:value = '...']"
  • Domain → indicator with pattern: "[domain-name:value = '...']"
  • File hash → indicator with pattern: "[file:hashes.SHA-256 = '...']"

Attach relationship objects linking indicators to threat-actor or malware objects. Use confidence field (0–100) based on source fidelity rating.

Step 4: Deduplicate and Enrich

Run deduplication against existing TIP database using normalized value + type as composite key. Enrich surviving IOCs:

  • VirusTotal: detection ratio, sandbox behavior reports
  • PassiveTotal (RiskIQ): WHOIS history, passive DNS, SSL certificate chains
  • Shodan: banner data, open ports, geographic location

Step 5: Distribute to Consuming Systems

Export enriched indicators via TAXII 2.1 push to SIEM (Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel), firewalls (Palo Alto XSOAR playbooks), and EDR platforms. Set TTL (time-to-live) per indicator type: IP addresses 30 days, domains 90 days, file hashes 1 year.

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
STIX 2.1Structured Threat Information Expression — OASIS standard JSON schema for CTI objects including indicators, threat actors, campaigns, and relationships
TAXII 2.1Trusted Automated eXchange of Intelligence Information — HTTPS-based protocol for sharing STIX content between servers and clients
IOCIndicator of Compromise — observable artifact (IP, domain, hash, URL) that indicates a system may have been breached
TLPTraffic Light Protocol — color-coded classification (RED/AMBER/GREEN/WHITE) defining sharing restrictions for CTI
Confidence ScoreNumeric value (0–100 in STIX) reflecting the producer's certainty about an indicator's malicious attribution
Feed FidelityHistorical accuracy rate of a feed measured by true positive rate in production detections

Tools & Systems

  • ThreatConnect TC Exchange: Aggregates 100+ commercial and OSINT feeds; provides automated playbooks for IOC enrichment
  • MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform): Open-source TIP supporting STIX/TAXII; widely used by ISACs and government CERTs
  • OpenCTI: Open-source platform with native MITRE ATT&CK integration and graph-based relationship visualization
  • Recorded Future: Commercial feed with AI-powered risk scoring and real-time dark web monitoring
  • taxii2-client: Python library for TAXII 2.0/2.1 client operations (pip install taxii2-client)
  • PyMISP: Python API for MISP feed management and IOC submission

Common Pitfalls

  • IOC age staleness: IP addresses and domains rotate frequently; applying 1-year-old IOCs generates false positives. Enforce TTL policies.
  • Missing context: Blocking an IOC without understanding the associated campaign or adversary can disrupt legitimate business traffic (e.g., CDN IPs shared with malicious actors).
  • Feed overlap without deduplication: Ingesting the same IOC from five feeds without deduplication inflates indicator counts and SIEM rule complexity.
  • TLP violation: Redistributing RED-classified intelligence outside authorized boundaries violates sharing agreements and trust relationships.
  • Over-blocking on low-confidence indicators: Indicators with confidence below 50 should trigger detection-only rules, not blocking, to avoid operational disruption.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Assess exposure of Windows secrets protected by DPAPI, the operating system’s data protection service, during authorized security tests. Guide examination and decryption of saved credentials and browser data using available user sessions, credentials, or backup keys.

  • Assessing saved credential exposure in authorized tests
  • Examining collected DPAPI files offline
  • Reviewing protected browser and RDP credentials
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.9KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Assess Shadow Credentials account takeover during authorized Active Directory testing. Examine permissions that allow public key registration, validate authentication without a password reset, and document credential cleanup, detection opportunities, and access control changes needed for remediation.

  • Assessing risky permissions identified in BloodHound
  • Validating account takeover without resetting a password
  • Generating directory change records during security exercises
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.9KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Prepare for CMMC Level 2, a cybersecurity certification for defense contractors. Define the systems handling controlled information, review security requirements, calculate the SPRS assessment score, and organize remediation plans and evidence into a readiness report.

  • Define the assessment scope for systems handling controlled information
  • Calculate an SPRS score and prioritize unmet security requirements
  • Prepare security plans, remediation milestones, and assessment evidence
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.9KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Create disk images for investigations using dd or dcfldd on Linux. The workflow covers write protection, bit-for-bit copying, hash checks to verify integrity, and documentation of the acquisition process.

  • Preserving a suspect drive before investigation
  • Creating evidence copies of USB devices or memory cards
  • Verifying that a disk image matches its source
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.9KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Review Active Directory permissions with ldap3, a Python library for directory queries. Identify excessive access granted to non-administrative accounts, explain potential privilege escalation paths, and produce a JSON report with affected objects and remediation recommendations.

  • Auditing excessive Active Directory permissions
  • Investigating privilege escalation paths from ordinary accounts
  • Reporting affected objects and permission remediation recommendations
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.9KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Inspect suspicious Android APK files without running them. Analyze permissions, app components, suspicious code patterns, and network indicators, then produce a JSON risk report to support malware triage and detection rule development.

  • Triage suspicious APK files without running them
  • Inspect dangerous permission combinations and suspicious API calls
  • Extract network indicators for malware detection rules
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.9KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

See all skills by mukul975

Report a problem with this skill