Find lookalike domains with dnstwist and prioritize suspicious results using DNS records, registration age, and website similarity. The skill also covers monitoring for new findings and producing blocklists and reports to support domain takedown requests.
Generate domain permutations with dnstwist and check DNS resolution to detect typosquatting, homograph phishing, and brand impersonation domains registered against your organization. Use when asked to monitor for lookalike domains, investigate a phishing domain, or assess brand-impersonation risk.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
DNSTwist is a domain name permutation engine that generates similar-looking domain names to detect typosquatting, homograph phishing attacks, and brand impersonation. It creates thousands of domain permutations using techniques like character substitution, transposition, insertion, omission, and homoglyph replacement, then checks DNS records (A, AAAA, NS, MX), calculates web page similarity using fuzzy hashing (ssdeep) and perceptual hashing (pHash), and identifies potentially malicious registered domains.
dnstwist installed (pip install dnstwist[full])DNSTwist generates permutations using: addition (appending characters), bitsquatting (bit-flip errors), homoglyph (visually similar Unicode characters like rn vs m), hyphenation (adding hyphens), insertion (inserting characters), omission (removing characters), repetition (repeating characters), replacement (replacing with adjacent keyboard keys), subdomain (inserting dots), transposition (swapping adjacent characters), vowel-swap (swapping vowels), and dictionary-based (appending common words).
DNSTwist uses ssdeep (locality-sensitive hash) to compare HTML content and pHash (perceptual hash) to compare screenshots of web pages. This helps identify cloned phishing sites that visually mimic the legitimate site. A high similarity score indicates a likely phishing page.
The typical workflow is: generate domain permutations -> resolve DNS records -> check for registered domains -> compare web page similarity -> flag suspicious domains -> alert security team -> request takedown. For a typical corporate domain, dnstwist generates 5,000-10,000 permutations.
import subprocess
import json
import csv
from datetime import datetime
def run_dnstwist_scan(domain, output_file=None):
"""Run dnstwist scan against a target domain."""
cmd = [
"dnstwist",
"--registered", # Only show registered domains
"--format", "json", # Output in JSON
"--nameservers", "8.8.8.8,1.1.1.1",
"--threads", "50",
"--mxcheck", # Check MX records
"--ssdeep", # Fuzzy hash comparison
"--geoip", # GeoIP lookup
domain,
]
print(f"[*] Scanning permutations for: {domain}")
result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=600)
if result.returncode == 0:
results = json.loads(result.stdout)
registered = [r for r in results if r.get("dns_a") or r.get("dns_aaaa")]
print(f"[+] Found {len(registered)} registered lookalike domains")
if output_file:
with open(output_file, "w") as f:
json.dump(registered, f, indent=2)
print(f"[+] Results saved to {output_file}")
return registered
else:
print(f"[-] dnstwist error: {result.stderr}")
return []
results = run_dnstwist_scan("example.com", "typosquat_results.json")
def analyze_results(results, legitimate_ips=None):
"""Analyze dnstwist results and prioritize threats."""
legitimate_ips = legitimate_ips or set()
high_risk = []
medium_risk = []
low_risk = []
for entry in results:
domain = entry.get("domain", "")
fuzzer = entry.get("fuzzer", "")
dns_a = entry.get("dns_a", [])
dns_mx = entry.get("dns_mx", [])
ssdeep_score = entry.get("ssdeep_score", 0)
risk_score = 0
risk_factors = []
# High similarity to legitimate site
if ssdeep_score and ssdeep_score > 50:
risk_score += 40
risk_factors.append(f"high web similarity ({ssdeep_score}%)")
# Has MX records (can receive email / phishing)
if dns_mx:
risk_score += 20
risk_factors.append("has MX records (email capable)")
# Recently registered (if whois data available)
whois_created = entry.get("whois_created", "")
if whois_created:
try:
created = datetime.fromisoformat(whois_created.replace("Z", "+00:00"))
age_days = (datetime.now(created.tzinfo) - created).days
if age_days < 30:
risk_score += 30
risk_factors.append(f"recently registered ({age_days} days)")
elif age_days < 90:
risk_score += 15
risk_factors.append(f"registered {age_days} days ago")
except (ValueError, TypeError):
pass
# Homoglyph attacks are highest risk
if fuzzer == "homoglyph":
risk_score += 25
risk_factors.append("homoglyph (visually identical)")
elif fuzzer in ("addition", "replacement", "transposition"):
risk_score += 10
risk_factors.append(f"permutation type: {fuzzer}")
# Not pointing to legitimate infrastructure
if dns_a and not set(dns_a).intersection(legitimate_ips):
risk_score += 10
risk_factors.append("different IP from legitimate")
entry["risk_score"] = risk_score
entry["risk_factors"] = risk_factors
if risk_score >= 50:
high_risk.append(entry)
elif risk_score >= 25:
medium_risk.append(entry)
else:
low_risk.append(entry)
high_risk.sort(key=lambda x: x["risk_score"], reverse=True)
medium_risk.sort(key=lambda x: x["risk_score"], reverse=True)
print(f"\n=== Typosquatting Analysis ===")
print(f"High Risk: {len(high_risk)}")
print(f"Medium Risk: {len(medium_risk)}")
print(f"Low Risk: {len(low_risk)}")
if high_risk:
print(f"\n--- High Risk Domains ---")
for entry in high_risk[:10]:
print(f" {entry['domain']} (score: {entry['risk_score']})")
for factor in entry['risk_factors']:
print(f" - {factor}")
return {"high": high_risk, "medium": medium_risk, "low": low_risk}
analysis = analyze_results(results, legitimate_ips={"93.184.216.34"})
import time
import hashlib
class TyposquatMonitor:
def __init__(self, domains, known_domains_file="known_typosquats.json"):
self.domains = domains
self.known_file = known_domains_file
self.known_domains = self._load_known()
def _load_known(self):
try:
with open(self.known_file, "r") as f:
return json.load(f)
except FileNotFoundError:
return {}
def _save_known(self):
with open(self.known_file, "w") as f:
json.dump(self.known_domains, f, indent=2)
def scan_all_domains(self):
"""Scan all monitored domains for new typosquats."""
new_findings = []
for domain in self.domains:
results = run_dnstwist_scan(domain)
for entry in results:
domain_key = entry.get("domain", "")
if domain_key not in self.known_domains:
entry["first_seen"] = datetime.now().isoformat()
entry["monitored_domain"] = domain
self.known_domains[domain_key] = entry
new_findings.append(entry)
print(f" [NEW] {domain_key} ({entry.get('fuzzer', '')})")
self._save_known()
print(f"\n[+] New typosquatting domains found: {len(new_findings)}")
return new_findings
def generate_alert(self, findings):
"""Generate alert for new high-risk typosquatting domains."""
analysis = analyze_results(findings)
alerts = []
for entry in analysis["high"]:
alerts.append({
"severity": "HIGH",
"domain": entry["domain"],
"target": entry.get("monitored_domain", ""),
"risk_score": entry["risk_score"],
"risk_factors": entry["risk_factors"],
"dns_a": entry.get("dns_a", []),
"dns_mx": entry.get("dns_mx", []),
"timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(),
})
return alerts
monitor = TyposquatMonitor(["mycompany.com", "mycompany.org"])
new_findings = monitor.scan_all_domains()
alerts = monitor.generate_alert(new_findings)
def export_blocklist(analysis, output_file="blocklist.txt"):
"""Export high-risk domains as blocklist for firewall/proxy."""
domains = []
for entry in analysis["high"] + analysis["medium"]:
domain = entry.get("domain", "")
if domain:
domains.append(domain)
with open(output_file, "w") as f:
f.write(f"# Typosquatting blocklist generated {datetime.now().isoformat()}\n")
for d in sorted(set(domains)):
f.write(f"{d}\n")
print(f"[+] Blocklist saved: {len(domains)} domains -> {output_file}")
return domains
def generate_takedown_report(high_risk_domains):
"""Generate takedown request report."""
report = f"""# Domain Takedown Request
Generated: {datetime.now().isoformat()}
## Summary
{len(high_risk_domains)} domains identified as potential typosquatting/phishing.
## Domains Requiring Takedown
"""
for entry in high_risk_domains:
report += f"""
### {entry['domain']}
- **Permutation Type**: {entry.get('fuzzer', 'unknown')}
- **IP Address**: {', '.join(entry.get('dns_a', ['N/A']))}
- **MX Records**: {', '.join(entry.get('dns_mx', ['N/A']))}
- **Risk Score**: {entry.get('risk_score', 0)}
- **Risk Factors**: {'; '.join(entry.get('risk_factors', []))}
- **Web Similarity**: {entry.get('ssdeep_score', 'N/A')}%
"""
with open("takedown_report.md", "w") as f:
f.write(report)
print("[+] Takedown report generated: takedown_report.md")
export_blocklist(analysis)
generate_takedown_report(analysis["high"])
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Assess exposure of Windows secrets protected by DPAPI, the operating system’s data protection service, during authorized security tests. Guide examination and decryption of saved credentials and browser data using available user sessions, credentials, or backup keys.
Assess Shadow Credentials account takeover during authorized Active Directory testing. Examine permissions that allow public key registration, validate authentication without a password reset, and document credential cleanup, detection opportunities, and access control changes needed for remediation.
Prepare for CMMC Level 2, a cybersecurity certification for defense contractors. Define the systems handling controlled information, review security requirements, calculate the SPRS assessment score, and organize remediation plans and evidence into a readiness report.
Create disk images for investigations using dd or dcfldd on Linux. The workflow covers write protection, bit-for-bit copying, hash checks to verify integrity, and documentation of the acquisition process.
Review Active Directory permissions with ldap3, a Python library for directory queries. Identify excessive access granted to non-administrative accounts, explain potential privilege escalation paths, and produce a JSON report with affected objects and remediation recommendations.
Inspect suspicious Android APK files without running them. Analyze permissions, app components, suspicious code patterns, and network indicators, then produce a JSON risk report to support malware triage and detection rule development.