Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

conducting-network-penetration-test

Assess authorized networks through host discovery, service checks, vulnerability identification, and controlled exploitation. Follow a structured testing process to document attack paths, demonstrate business impact, clean up test artifacts, and prioritize remediation.

OriginalShow the original description

Conducts comprehensive network penetration tests against authorized target environments by performing host discovery, port scanning, service enumeration, vulnerability identification, and controlled exploitation to assess the security posture of network infrastructure. The tester follows PTES methodology from reconnaissance through post-exploitation and reporting. Activates for requests involving network pentest, infrastructure security assessment, internal network testing, or external perimeter testing.

See how to install

Good for

  • Assessing internal or external network security
  • Validating firewall rules and network segmentation
  • Verifying whether service vulnerabilities are exploitable
  • Preparing findings and prioritized remediation recommendations

Files included (4)

  • SKILL.md12.4 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md2.2 KB
  • scripts/agent.py7.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Conducting Network Penetration Test

When to Use

  • Assessing the security posture of internal or external network infrastructure before or after deployment
  • Validating firewall rules, network segmentation, and access controls under realistic attack conditions
  • Identifying exploitable vulnerabilities in network services, protocols, and configurations
  • Meeting compliance requirements for PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, or ISO 27001 that mandate periodic penetration testing
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of IDS/IPS, SIEM, and SOC detection capabilities against real attack traffic

Do not use for testing networks without explicit written authorization from the asset owner, against production systems without a pre-approved change window and rollback plan, or for denial-of-service testing unless explicitly scoped and authorized.

Prerequisites

  • Signed Rules of Engagement (RoE) document specifying target IP ranges, excluded hosts, testing hours, and emergency contacts
  • Written authorization letter (get-out-of-jail letter) from the network owner
  • Dedicated testing laptop with Kali Linux or equivalent distribution with up-to-date tools
  • VPN or direct network access to the target scope as defined in the RoE
  • Out-of-band communication channel with the client's incident response team
  • Scope document listing in-scope IP ranges, domains, and any explicitly excluded systems (medical devices, SCADA, critical infrastructure)

Workflow

Step 1: Pre-Engagement and Scope Validation

Validate the scope by confirming IP ranges with the client. Verify that all IP addresses in scope are owned by the client using ARIN/RIPE WHOIS lookups. Confirm testing windows, escalation procedures, and any sensitivity constraints. Set up the testing environment with a dedicated VM, VPN connection, and logging enabled on all tools. Create a timestamped activity log that records every command executed, every scan launched, and every exploit attempted throughout the engagement.

Step 2: Host Discovery and Network Mapping

Identify live hosts within the authorized scope using layered discovery techniques:

  • ICMP sweep: nmap -sn -PE -PP -PM 10.10.0.0/16 -oA discovery_icmp to find hosts responding to ping
  • ARP scan (internal networks): nmap -sn -PR 10.10.0.0/24 -oA discovery_arp or arp-scan -l for local subnet enumeration
  • TCP SYN discovery: nmap -sn -PS21,22,25,80,443,445,3389,8080 10.10.0.0/16 -oA discovery_tcp to find hosts with ICMP blocked
  • UDP discovery: nmap -sn -PU53,161,500 10.10.0.0/16 -oA discovery_udp for hosts only responding on UDP

Consolidate live hosts into a target list. Map the network topology by identifying gateways, VLAN boundaries, and trust relationships using traceroute and SNMP community string guessing where authorized.

Step 3: Port Scanning and Service Enumeration

Perform detailed port scanning on discovered hosts:

  • Full TCP scan: nmap -sS -p- --min-rate 1000 -T4 -oA full_tcp <target> to identify all open TCP ports
  • Top UDP ports: nmap -sU --top-ports 200 -T4 -oA top_udp <target> for commonly exploitable UDP services
  • Service version detection: nmap -sV -sC -p <open_ports> -oA service_enum <target> to fingerprint service versions and run default NSE scripts
  • OS fingerprinting: nmap -O --osscan-guess -oA os_detection <target> to identify operating systems

Enumerate discovered services in depth using protocol-specific tools:

  • SMB: enum4linux -a <target>, crackmapexec smb <target> --shares
  • SNMP: snmpwalk -v2c -c public <target>
  • DNS: dig axfr @<dns_server> <domain> for zone transfer attempts
  • LDAP: ldapsearch -x -H ldap://<target> -b "dc=example,dc=com"

Step 4: Vulnerability Identification

Correlate discovered service versions against known vulnerability databases:

  • Run nmap --script vuln -p <ports> <target> for NSE vulnerability scripts
  • Use searchsploit <service> <version> to query the Exploit-DB offline database
  • Cross-reference with NVD (National Vulnerability Database) and CVE records for confirmed vulnerabilities
  • Check for default credentials on management interfaces (Tomcat Manager, Jenkins, phpMyAdmin, database consoles)
  • Test for common misconfigurations: anonymous FTP, open SMTP relays, unrestricted SNMP communities, NFS exports without authentication

Prioritize vulnerabilities by CVSS score, exploitability, and business impact. Document each finding with CVE identifier, affected host, service, and version.

Step 5: Exploitation

Attempt controlled exploitation of validated vulnerabilities using the principle of minimum necessary access:

  • Metasploit Framework: msfconsole with appropriate exploit modules matched to confirmed vulnerabilities. Set RHOSTS, RPORT, and payload options. Prefer bind/reverse TCP Meterpreter for post-exploitation flexibility.
  • Manual exploitation: Use public proof-of-concept exploits from Exploit-DB after code review. Compile and modify as needed for the target environment.
  • Credential attacks: Use hydra or crackmapexec for password spraying against discovered services (SSH, RDP, SMB, HTTP basic auth) using common credential lists. Respect lockout policies.
  • Pass-the-hash / relay: If NTLM hashes are obtained, attempt pass-the-hash with impacket-psexec or relay attacks with impacket-ntlmrelayx where SMB signing is disabled.

Document every exploitation attempt including failures. Capture screenshots of successful compromises showing hostname, IP, current user, and privilege level.

Step 6: Post-Exploitation and Pivoting

After gaining access to a host, demonstrate business impact:

  • Privilege escalation: Check for local privilege escalation paths using linpeas.sh (Linux) or winPEAS.exe (Windows). Look for misconfigured services, SUID binaries, unquoted service paths, or kernel exploits.
  • Credential harvesting: Extract stored credentials from memory (mimikatz), files (config files, browser stores), or cached hashes (hashdump).
  • Lateral movement: Use obtained credentials to pivot to additional systems. Test network segmentation by attempting to reach out-of-scope networks from compromised hosts.
  • Data access demonstration: Identify sensitive data accessible from compromised systems (PII databases, file shares, backup files) and document access without exfiltrating actual data.

Maintain detailed notes on every pivot point, credential obtained, and system accessed to build the attack chain narrative.

Step 7: Cleanup and Reporting

Remove all testing artifacts from compromised systems:

  • Delete uploaded tools, shells, and temporary files
  • Remove any accounts created during testing
  • Revert configuration changes made during exploitation
  • Verify cleanup by re-scanning affected hosts

Prepare the penetration test report with executive summary, methodology description, finding details with CVSS scores, proof-of-concept evidence, and prioritized remediation recommendations.

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Rules of Engagement (RoE)Formal document defining the scope, boundaries, testing hours, authorized actions, and escalation procedures for a penetration test
PivotUsing a compromised host as a relay point to access additional network segments not directly reachable from the tester's position
Service EnumerationThe process of identifying running services, their versions, and configurations on discovered hosts to map the attack surface
Credential SprayingTesting a small number of commonly used passwords against many accounts simultaneously to avoid account lockout thresholds
CVSSCommon Vulnerability Scoring System; an industry-standard framework for rating the severity of vulnerabilities on a 0-10 scale
Lateral MovementTechniques used to move from one compromised system to another within a network, expanding the scope of access
Post-ExploitationActivities performed after initial compromise including privilege escalation, persistence, credential harvesting, and data access

Tools & Systems

  • Nmap: Network discovery, port scanning, service enumeration, and vulnerability detection via the Nmap Scripting Engine (NSE)
  • Metasploit Framework: Exploitation framework providing exploit modules, payloads, encoders, and post-exploitation tools for validated vulnerability exploitation
  • CrackMapExec: Swiss-army knife for Windows/Active Directory environments supporting SMB, WinRM, LDAP, and MSSQL enumeration and exploitation
  • Impacket: Python library providing low-level programmatic access to network protocols (SMB, MSRPC, Kerberos) used for relay attacks and remote execution
  • Burp Suite: Web application proxy used when network services expose HTTP-based management interfaces

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Internal Network Penetration Test for a Financial Institution

Context: The client is a mid-size bank requiring PCI-DSS compliance. Scope includes the internal corporate network (10.10.0.0/16), excluding payment processing systems in a separate VLAN. Testing window is Monday-Friday 20:00-06:00 to minimize impact on operations.

Approach:

  1. Perform ARP-based host discovery on accessible subnets and TCP SYN discovery for hosts with ICMP disabled
  2. Conduct full port scans on all discovered hosts, prioritizing Windows servers and domain controllers
  3. Enumerate SMB shares, SNMP communities, and web management interfaces for quick wins
  4. Identify and exploit an unpatched Apache Tomcat instance with default credentials to gain initial foothold
  5. Escalate privileges via a local Windows kernel vulnerability, then extract cached domain credentials with Mimikatz
  6. Demonstrate lateral movement to the database server containing customer records, proving inadequate network segmentation
  7. Document the complete attack path from initial access to sensitive data, with remediation steps for each vulnerability

Pitfalls:

  • Scanning too aggressively during business hours and triggering IDS alerts or service disruptions
  • Failing to verify that all target IPs are actually owned by the client before scanning
  • Not documenting exploitation attempts that failed, missing the opportunity to report on effective controls
  • Forgetting to clean up Meterpreter sessions and uploaded tools after testing

Output Format

## Finding: Unpatched Apache Tomcat with Default Credentials

**ID**: NET-001
**Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.8)
**Affected Host**: 10.10.5.23 (tomcat-prod.internal.corp)
**Service**: Apache Tomcat 8.5.31 on port 8080
**CVE**: CVE-2019-0232

**Description**:
The Apache Tomcat instance on 10.10.5.23:8080 is running version 8.5.31, which is
vulnerable to CVE-2019-0232 (remote code execution via CGI Servlet). Additionally,
the Tomcat Manager interface is accessible with default credentials (tomcat:tomcat),
allowing deployment of arbitrary WAR files.

**Proof of Concept**:
1. Accessed http://10.10.5.23:8080/manager/html with credentials tomcat:tomcat
2. Deployed malicious WAR file containing a reverse shell payload
3. Obtained command execution as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM

**Impact**:
Full system compromise of the Tomcat server. From this host, the tester
pivoted to 3 additional systems on the same subnet using harvested credentials,
ultimately accessing the customer database containing 50,000+ records.

**Remediation**:
1. Immediately change default Tomcat Manager credentials
2. Upgrade Apache Tomcat to the latest stable release (currently 10.1.x)
3. Restrict access to the Tomcat Manager interface to authorized management IPs only
4. Implement network segmentation between web servers and database tier

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Assess exposure of Windows secrets protected by DPAPI, the operating system’s data protection service, during authorized security tests. Guide examination and decryption of saved credentials and browser data using available user sessions, credentials, or backup keys.

  • Assessing saved credential exposure in authorized tests
  • Examining collected DPAPI files offline
  • Reviewing protected browser and RDP credentials
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.7KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Assess Shadow Credentials account takeover during authorized Active Directory testing. Examine permissions that allow public key registration, validate authentication without a password reset, and document credential cleanup, detection opportunities, and access control changes needed for remediation.

  • Assessing risky permissions identified in BloodHound
  • Validating account takeover without resetting a password
  • Generating directory change records during security exercises
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.7KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Prepare for CMMC Level 2, a cybersecurity certification for defense contractors. Define the systems handling controlled information, review security requirements, calculate the SPRS assessment score, and organize remediation plans and evidence into a readiness report.

  • Define the assessment scope for systems handling controlled information
  • Calculate an SPRS score and prioritize unmet security requirements
  • Prepare security plans, remediation milestones, and assessment evidence
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.7KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Create disk images for investigations using dd or dcfldd on Linux. The workflow covers write protection, bit-for-bit copying, hash checks to verify integrity, and documentation of the acquisition process.

  • Preserving a suspect drive before investigation
  • Creating evidence copies of USB devices or memory cards
  • Verifying that a disk image matches its source
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.7KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Review Active Directory permissions with ldap3, a Python library for directory queries. Identify excessive access granted to non-administrative accounts, explain potential privilege escalation paths, and produce a JSON report with affected objects and remediation recommendations.

  • Auditing excessive Active Directory permissions
  • Investigating privilege escalation paths from ordinary accounts
  • Reporting affected objects and permission remediation recommendations
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.7KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Inspect suspicious Android APK files without running them. Analyze permissions, app components, suspicious code patterns, and network indicators, then produce a JSON risk report to support malware triage and detection rule development.

  • Triage suspicious APK files without running them
  • Inspect dangerous permission combinations and suspicious API calls
  • Extract network indicators for malware detection rules
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34.7KUpdated Aug 31, 2026

See all skills by mukul975

Report a problem with this skill