Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

hipaa-interoperability

Addresses HIPAA privacy and security requirements for health data interoperability under the 21st Century Cures Act, ONC Health IT Certification Program, and CMS Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule. Covers information blocking prohibitions, FHIR API patient access, TEFCA exchange purposes, and privacy safeguards for health information exchange. Keywords: interoperability, information blocking, FHIR, TEFCA, Cures Act, patient access API, health information exchange.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (5)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • assets/template.md4.2 KB
  • references/standards.md3.9 KB
  • references/workflows.md8.9 KB
  • scripts/process.py10.8 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

HIPAA Interoperability — Cures Act, ONC, and CMS Requirements

Overview

The 21st Century Cures Act (Public Law 114-255, 2016) fundamentally changed the interoperability landscape by prohibiting information blocking and mandating standardized API-based patient access. The ONC Health IT Certification Program (45 CFR Part 170) and the CMS Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule (CMS-9115-F, 85 FR 25510, May 1, 2020) together require health IT developers, healthcare providers, health information exchanges (HIEs), and health information networks (HINs) to support seamless data exchange while maintaining HIPAA privacy and security protections. The Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA), launched operationally in December 2023, establishes a nationwide framework for health information exchange with defined exchange purposes and privacy requirements.

Regulatory Framework

21st Century Cures Act — Information Blocking

  • Section 4004: Defines information blocking as a practice that is likely to interfere with, prevent, or materially discourage access, exchange, or use of electronic health information (EHI)
  • Actors covered: Health IT developers of certified health IT, HIEs, HINs, and healthcare providers
  • EHI definition: As of October 6, 2022, EHI is the electronic protected health information (ePHI) in a designated record set as defined under HIPAA (45 CFR §171.102), plus any other electronic health information identified by the Secretary

Information Blocking Exceptions (45 CFR Part 171)

ExceptionCategoryDescription
Preventing Harm (§171.201)Not fulfilling requestsPractice is reasonable and necessary to prevent harm to a patient or another person
Privacy (§171.202)Not fulfilling requestsPractice is required by or consistent with HIPAA Privacy Rule obligations
Security (§171.203)Not fulfilling requestsPractice is directly related to safeguarding the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of EHI
Infeasibility (§171.204)Not fulfilling requestsFulfilling the request is technically infeasible
Health IT Performance (§171.205)ProceduresPractice is for reasonable maintenance or improvements to health IT
Content and Manner (§171.301)ProceduresActor fulfills a request in an alternative manner or with alternative content
Fees (§171.302)ProceduresFees charged are reasonable and based on objective, verifiable criteria
Licensing (§171.303)ProceduresLicensing terms are reasonable and non-discriminatory

CMS Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule

  • Patient Access API (§431.60): CMS-regulated payers (Medicaid, CHIP, QHP issuers on FFE) must implement a FHIR R4-based Patient Access API allowing patients to access claims, encounter, and clinical data
  • Provider Directory API (§431.70): Payers must implement a publicly accessible FHIR-based provider directory
  • Payer-to-Payer Data Exchange (CMS-0057-F, effective January 1, 2026): Payers must exchange patient data at the patient's request when they switch plans
  • Prior Authorization API (CMS-0057-F): Payers must implement a FHIR-based prior authorization API

TEFCA Exchange Purposes

Exchange PurposeDescriptionHIPAA Basis
TreatmentDirect patient care§164.506(c)(2) — TPO
PaymentClaims, eligibility, coordination of benefits§164.506(c)(3) — TPO
Healthcare OperationsQuality assessment, care coordination§164.506(c)(5) — TPO
Public HealthReporting to public health authorities§164.512(b)
Benefits DeterminationHealth plan coverage decisions§164.506(c)(3)
Individual AccessPatient right of access§164.524

HIPAA Privacy Safeguards for Interoperability

Patient Access via FHIR API

  1. Identity verification: Verify patient identity using multi-factor authentication before granting API access (aligned with NIST IAL2/AAL2)
  2. Scope of access: HIPAA right of access (§164.524) — entire designated record set except psychotherapy notes, information compiled for legal proceedings, and certain lab results under CLIA
  3. Third-party app authorization: Patient may direct data to third-party apps via SMART on FHIR; once data is shared with a non-covered entity app, HIPAA protections may no longer apply — disclosure notice required
  4. Minimum necessary: Does NOT apply to individual access requests (§164.502(b)(2)(v)) or treatment disclosures

HIE/HIN Privacy Requirements

  1. Maintain BAAs with all participating providers per §164.502(e)
  2. Implement role-based access tied to exchange purpose
  3. Apply consent management per state law requirements (particularly for 42 CFR Part 2 substance abuse records and state-specific sensitive categories)
  4. Maintain accounting of disclosures per §164.528

Security Requirements for Interoperable Systems

RequirementRegulationImplementation
Encryption in transit§164.312(e)(1)TLS 1.2+ for all FHIR API and HIE connections
Access controls§164.312(a)(1)OAuth 2.0 / SMART on FHIR authorization
Audit controls§164.312(b)Log all API requests, queries, and data exchanges with timestamps and actor identity
Integrity controls§164.312(c)(1)Digital signatures on exchange payloads; FHIR resource versioning
Authentication§164.312(d)Unique user identification for all API consumers; system-level certificates for point-to-point

Enforcement

  • Information blocking penalties: Health IT developers, HIEs, and HINs face civil monetary penalties up to $1 million per violation under ONC (final rule effective September 1, 2023). Healthcare providers face appropriate disincentives through CMS (final rule pending).
  • HIPAA penalties: Standard HIPAA enforcement under OCR applies to all privacy and security violations in the interoperability context.

Integration Points

  • hipaa-privacy-rule: Interoperability must comply with all Privacy Rule requirements for uses and disclosures
  • hipaa-security-rule: Technical safeguards for API and exchange security
  • hipaa-minimum-necessary: Minimum necessary standard applies to most interoperability disclosures (except individual access and treatment)
  • hipaa-baa-management: BAAs required for all HIE/HIN participants and health IT vendors accessing PHI
  • hipaa-breach-notification: Breach notification obligations extend to interoperability-related incidents

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills315Updated Mar 17, 2026

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills315Updated Mar 17, 2026

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills315Updated Mar 17, 2026

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills315Updated Mar 17, 2026

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills315Updated Mar 17, 2026

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills315Updated Mar 17, 2026

See all skills by mukul975

Report a problem with this skill