Structured 3-phase peer review of a diff or PR — intent, issues by severity, then pointed merge-readiness questions and a verdict. Use for general code review. Not for AI workflow self-fix-and-edit (ai-systems-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate threat models (adversarial-challenge). Phase 3 asks questions only; it is not the adversarial-challenge skill.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Senior peer review of a change. Challenge correctness, find breaks and subtle bugs. Ends with a verdict — does not edit code.
Not this skill:
ai-systems-reviewadversarial-challengeadversarial-challenge → decide → ai-systems-reviewIn 2–4 sentences, state:
Do not speculate beyond what the code shows. If intent is unclear, say so.
For each issue:
Skip empty categories. Do not manufacture issues.
Ask 3–5 pointed questions the author must answer for a safe merge. Tailor to this
diff — no generic checklists. Each question cites a specific part of the code.
(This is not adversarial-challenge; questions only, no threat-model writeup.)
Approve | Approve with nits | Request changes | Block — one-sentence justificationNo reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Formats output for ADHD-friendly action — lead with the next step, number tasks, restate state, cut fluff. Use when named (adhd), when the user mentions ADHD or focus/executive-function constraints, or when they ask for steps they can execute immediately.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Devil's-advocate attack on AI workflow designs — threat model, assumption challenges, code critiques, and hypothetical redesigns with no file edits. Use for "attack this design", devil's advocate, or hostile challenge on agents/tools/summarization/tokens. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or self-review that applies fixes (ai-systems-review). Prefer: this skill → decide → ai-systems-review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Hostile self-review of recently written AI workflow code that then applies fixes (agents, tools, chat context, summarization, tokens, attachments). Use after generating AI systems code, or when asked to self-review and harden it. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate attacks (adversarial-challenge). Prefer: adversarial-challenge → decide → this skill.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Writes in ASD-STE100 simplified technical English — short sentences, plain words, active voice. Use when the user wants terse technical prose, names this skill, or asks for STE100.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Builds personal brand assets using Seth Godin's frameworks: signature symbol, slogan, surprise (Purple Cow), salient idea, and signature story. Use when named (branding), or when the user asks for a brand symbol, slogan, tagline, Purple Cow, counterintuitive angle, core idea, brand story, or personal brand positioning.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Disables the AI's default hedging, diplomatic softening, and social-nicety layers to deliver cold, unfiltered, consequentialist analysis on any topic. Use when the user wants the AI's actual assessment without padding, regardless of how harsh or uncomfortable the honest answer is.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.