Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHubEnglish overview

weekly-review-planning

Review a week's calendar, tasks, and notes to identify completed commitments, overdue work, stalled projects, and follow-ups. Turn those findings into a realistic next-week plan that accounts for scheduled commitments and available capacity.

OriginalShow the original description

Weekly reset: commitments, stalled work, next-week plan.

AI rating90/ 100See how to install

Good for

  • Review completed commitments and overdue work
  • Find stalled projects without a clear next action
  • Organize waiting items and follow-up dates
  • Plan next week around calendar commitments

Overview

What it does

Reviews the week across your chosen calendars, task lists, notes, and other sources. It looks back at meetings and commitments, then checks deadlines, travel, and preparation needs for the next one to two weeks. For active projects, it organizes desired outcomes, next actions, owners, deadlines, and blockers, identifying stalled work and conflicting records. It also gathers items awaiting replies and promises you have made, then combines the findings into a next-week plan that fits your scheduled workload.

When it helps

Use it when tasks and notes are scattered across several places and you are concerned about missed commitments or neglected projects. It also helps clarify which outcomes to prioritize and which work to defer, instead of carrying every unfinished task into the next week.

Example requests

  • “Review this week's commitments and overdue work.”
  • “Organize pending replies and stalled projects.”
  • “Plan next week from my calendar and tasks.”

Notes

First confirm the systems, date range, timezone, and authoritative sources. Connectors or related skills are required for the calendars and notes you use. By default, it produces recommendations or drafts; changes to tasks, events, and notes stay within the approved scope. The review also states which information could not be accessed.

This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.

Objective evaluation

AI rated this skill on four points using only the contents of its SKILL.md. Stars and popularity are not taken into account.

Clear instructionsIs it clear when to use it and what it does?
AGoodWeekly-review use cases are explicit, and daily briefs and single-inbox triage are excluded.
Concrete stepsAre steps, inputs, outputs, and examples spelled out?
AGoodIt provides seven procedural stages, completion criteria, a seven-part output structure, and verification checks.
SafetyAre sending data, deleting files, and running commands disclosed?
AGoodChanges require approval, and every changed record must be read back from its provider for verification.
Easy setupDoes it need few tools or API keys, and are they documented?
BPartly lackingIt names connectors and related skills such as google-workspace, but provides no connection setup instructions.

The total counts each point as A = 25, B = 15, C = 5. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 20, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.

Disagree? Request a re-evaluation

Tell us which point is wrong and why. No login needed. We will check it against the SKILL.md, redo the evaluation, and show the result here.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Weekly Review and Planning

Run a bounded weekly reset across the user's chosen systems. This is a concrete recurring task, not a generic productivity methodology — the weekly-review Automation Blueprint schedules it as a cron job.

When to Use

  • "Run my weekly review."
  • "What did I commit to and what is slipping?"
  • "Plan next week from my calendar, tasks, and notes."
  • "Find stale projects and waiting items."
  • A cron tick fires for a scheduled weekly review.

Don't use for: daily briefs (see the google-workspace daily-brief reference) or single-inbox triage (email-inbox-triage).

Procedure

1. Set systems and window

Confirm timezone, review period, planning horizon, authoritative task/project store, calendars, inboxes, and allowed writes. Default to recommendations/drafts, not mutations. Done when source-of-truth conflicts have a declared winner.

2. Review calendar evidence

Load google-workspace or the relevant calendar connector. Inspect the completed week for meetings and commitments, then the next 1-2 weeks for deadlines, travel, preparation, and capacity. Capture follow-ups implied by past events and conflicts ahead. Done when both retrospective and horizon are covered.

3. Clear capture inboxes

Review the task inbox, notes (obsidian, notion), flagged email (email-inbox-triage owns thread-level triage), and other declared capture points. Convert each item to next action, project, waiting, scheduled, someday, reference, archive, or delete proposal. Do not mutate until scope is approved. Done when remaining unprocessed items are counted and stated.

4. Reconcile active projects

For each project identify desired outcome, next action, owner, deadline, blocker, last meaningful activity, and source link. Flag projects with no next action, missed dates, duplicate records, or contradictory status. Done when every active project is actionable or explicitly paused.

5. Review waiting and commitments

Find promises made by the user and items owed by others. Propose follow-ups with dates and channels. Do not infer that silence means completion. Done when each waiting item has an owner and next review/follow-up date.

6. Build a capacity-aware plan

Estimate fixed calendar load and select a small set of weekly outcomes plus near-term next actions. Rank by consequence, deadline, dependency, and effort; do not fill every free hour. Done when the plan fits actual capacity and names deferred work.

7. Apply approved updates

Update tasks/projects, create calendar holds, archive processed items, and draft follow-ups only as approved. Read every changed record back from the provider. Done when verified writes match the review summary.

Output Shape

  1. Wins and completed commitments
  2. Overdue or at risk
  3. Waiting/follow-ups
  4. Stalled or ambiguous projects
  5. Next week's outcomes and calendar constraints
  6. Proposed updates awaiting approval
  7. Coverage gaps

Pitfalls

  • Planning from tasks without calendar capacity.
  • Carrying every unfinished item forward as high priority.
  • Marking projects active with no next action.
  • Silently deleting or rescheduling personal commitments.
  • Treating silence from others as completion.

Verification

  • Both the completed week and the planning horizon were covered, or gaps are stated.
  • Every stalled/waiting flag traces to a specific record, event, or thread.
  • No task, event, or note was mutated without approval; approved writes were read back.
  • The plan names what was deferred, not just what was chosen.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

1password

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Set up the 1Password CLI and use stored passwords or API keys in commands and configuration templates. Choose an authentication method, retrieve secret references, and pass credentials to processes through environment variables.

  • Installing and configuring the 1Password CLI
  • Running commands with stored API keys
  • Filling configuration templates with stored secrets
NousResearch/hermes-agent256.1KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

3-statement-model

FreeSummaryAI rating 90

Build an Excel workbook linking the income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement. Populate historical figures, create formula-based forecasts, compare scenarios, and check that balances and cash totals agree across all three statements.

  • Populating a financial model template with historical data
  • Building linked forecasts across three financial statements
  • Comparing base, upside, and downside scenarios
NousResearch/hermes-agent256.1KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

accelerate

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Adapt existing PyTorch training scripts to use multiple GPUs or machines with limited code changes. The skill guides configuration, launch commands, mixed precision, which uses lower-precision numbers, and DeepSpeed or FSDP settings for distributing training work and memory.

  • Move a single-GPU training script to multiple GPUs
  • Configure mixed precision training
  • Set up DeepSpeed or FSDP to reduce memory use
NousResearch/hermes-agent256.1KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

actual-setup

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Configure Hermes to run AI models through Actual Computer on your own hardware. Set up either the hosted relay or a local connection, select models, verify responses, and troubleshoot request errors or empty output.

  • Connecting Hermes with an Actual inference key
  • Running models through a local Actual daemon
  • Downloading and loading local models
NousResearch/hermes-agent256.1KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

adversarial-ux-test

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Test an app from the perspective of a frustrated, less technical user. Find confusing steps and barriers, separate actionable usability problems from personal complaints, and produce screenshots, suggested fixes, and prioritized tickets.

  • Reviewing usability before a launch or demo
  • Checking the experience of a new user
  • Finding friction in signup and subscription flows
NousResearch/hermes-agent256.1KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

agent-merge-conflict-arbiter

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Resolve Git merge conflicts between two agents by comparing both changes and their stated goals. Combine compatible work, explain choices where designs differ, and verify the merged result with project builds or tests.

  • Resolving conflicts between branches edited by two agents
  • Integrating changes from parallel worktrees
  • Reviewing reasons for conflicting design choices
NousResearch/hermes-agent256.1KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

See all skills by NousResearch

Report a problem with this skill