Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

nw-agent-testing

5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Agent Testing Framework

5-Layer Testing Approach

Layer 1: Output Quality (Unit-Level)

Validate agent produces correct, well-structured outputs for typical inputs.

Test: Agent follows workflow phases | Outputs match expected format/structure | Domain-specific rules correctly applied | Token efficiency within bounds

How: Manual invocation with representative inputs. Check against acceptance criteria in agent description.

Layer 2: Integration / Handoff Validation

Validate correct input/output between agents in workflows.

Test: Input parsing handles upstream format | Output format matches downstream expectations | Error signals propagate correctly | Subagent mode activation works (skip greet, execute autonomously)

How: End-to-end workflow execution through full agent chain (e.g., DISCUSS -> DESIGN -> DELIVER).

Layer 3: Adversarial Output Validation

Challenge validity of agent outputs rather than accepting at face value.

Test: Source verification (cited sources real and accurate?) | Bias detection (favors one approach without evidence?) | Edge case coverage | Completeness (required sections present?)

How: Peer review by -reviewer agent using structured critique dimensions.

Layer 4: Adversarial Verification (Peer Review)

Independent review to catch biases and blind spots in agent design.

Test: Definition follows validation checklist? | Redundant Claude default instructions? | Over/under-specified? | Could simpler agent achieve same results?

How: @nw-agent-builder validates via 11-point checklist or @agent-builder-reviewer runs structured review.

Layer 5: Security Validation

Test resilience against misuse and prompt injection.

Test: Tool restriction enforcement | maxTurns respected | Permission mode correctly scoped | Agent stays within declared scope

How: Frontmatter fields enforce at platform level. Verify configuration.

Prompt Injection Resistance

Claude Code platform provides injection resistance through: subagent isolation (own context, no sub-subagents) | Tool restriction via frontmatter tools | Permission modes via permissionMode | Hook-based validation (PreToolUse, PostToolUse)

Do NOT add prose-based injection defense. Configure platform features:

---
tools: Read, Glob, Grep           # Only tools this agent needs
maxTurns: 30                       # Prevents runaway execution
permissionMode: default            # User approves dangerous actions
---

Security Validation Checklist

  • tools restricted to minimum necessary (least privilege)
  • maxTurns set to prevent runaway execution
  • permissionMode appropriate for risk level
  • No Bash unless agent requires command execution
  • No Write unless agent creates/modifies files
  • Description accurately describes scope
  • Subagent mode handles autonomous execution correctly
  • No sensitive data hardcoded in definition

Testing Workflow for New Agents

  1. Create with minimal definition
  2. Layer 1: Invoke with 2-3 representative inputs, check outputs
  3. Layer 2: Run in workflow chain if applicable
  4. Fix failures observed
  5. Validate: Run 11-point checklist
  6. Iterate: Add instructions only for observed failure modes

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

Comprehensive architecture patterns, methodologies, quality frameworks, and evaluation methods for solution architects. Load when designing system architecture or selecting patterns.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

See all skills by nWave-ai

Report a problem with this skill