Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Validate agent produces correct, well-structured outputs for typical inputs.
Test: Agent follows workflow phases | Outputs match expected format/structure | Domain-specific rules correctly applied | Token efficiency within bounds
How: Manual invocation with representative inputs. Check against acceptance criteria in agent description.
Validate correct input/output between agents in workflows.
Test: Input parsing handles upstream format | Output format matches downstream expectations | Error signals propagate correctly | Subagent mode activation works (skip greet, execute autonomously)
How: End-to-end workflow execution through full agent chain (e.g., DISCUSS -> DESIGN -> DELIVER).
Challenge validity of agent outputs rather than accepting at face value.
Test: Source verification (cited sources real and accurate?) | Bias detection (favors one approach without evidence?) | Edge case coverage | Completeness (required sections present?)
How: Peer review by -reviewer agent using structured critique dimensions.
Independent review to catch biases and blind spots in agent design.
Test: Definition follows validation checklist? | Redundant Claude default instructions? | Over/under-specified? | Could simpler agent achieve same results?
How: @nw-agent-builder validates via 11-point checklist or @agent-builder-reviewer runs structured review.
Test resilience against misuse and prompt injection.
Test: Tool restriction enforcement | maxTurns respected | Permission mode correctly scoped | Agent stays within declared scope
How: Frontmatter fields enforce at platform level. Verify configuration.
Claude Code platform provides injection resistance through: subagent isolation (own context, no sub-subagents) | Tool restriction via frontmatter tools | Permission modes via permissionMode | Hook-based validation (PreToolUse, PostToolUse)
Do NOT add prose-based injection defense. Configure platform features:
---
tools: Read, Glob, Grep # Only tools this agent needs
maxTurns: 30 # Prevents runaway execution
permissionMode: default # User approves dangerous actions
---
tools restricted to minimum necessary (least privilege)maxTurns set to prevent runaway executionpermissionMode appropriate for risk levelBash unless agent requires command executionWrite unless agent creates/modifies filesNo reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Comprehensive architecture patterns, methodologies, quality frameworks, and evaluation methods for solution architects. Load when designing system architecture or selecting patterns.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.