Interpret the saved results of a completed AI council review. Count verdicts, check whether enough participants responded and whether models are independent, surface substantive dissent, and explain what action the outcome supports.
Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Read a completed council run's artifacts and explain what the verdicts actually mean before anyone acts on them.
A /octo:council run has finished and the user asks "so what did the council decide?" or pastes a summary.json path.
~/.claude-octopus/results/ (look for summary.json and per-seat verdict files). If none exist within the session window, say so; never invent a verdict.summary.json, confirm each seat's real provider and model (the agy seat records its resolved model, not default). Flag same-lineage panels: two seats backed by the same model family weaken the verdict's independence.hooks/subagent-stop-gate.sh) may have flagged it; check the gate's usage log for quality scores.No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Turn a technical choice into a structured debate between different AI model families. Assign explicit positions, launch the discussion, and summarize agreement, disagreement, and a recommendation supported by the strongest argument that survives the debate.
Clarify a feature’s requirements with multiple AI providers, combining technical constraints with user and business needs. Produce a scoped definition covering priorities, edge cases, exclusions, and a requirements checklist before implementation begins.
Review code or documents with available AI providers before delivery. Combine findings into a scored validation report that checks prior requirements and decisions, separates critical issues from warnings, and recommends next steps.
Develop complex features or business documents by gathering approaches from available AI providers. Combine their perspectives with prior project decisions and quality checks to produce a proposed plan, then proceed with implementation after user confirmation.
Research technical, market, or academic topics through multiple available AI providers working in parallel. Combine their findings into a report that preserves disagreements, identifies gaps, attributes sources, and recommends next steps with priorities.
Research technical or business questions through multiple available AI providers, each assigned a different perspective. Combine usable results into a report covering findings, disagreements, evidence gaps, priorities, and recommended next steps.