Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHubEnglish overview

finishing-a-development-branch

Finish completed development work by checking the full test suite and presenting integration choices: merge locally, create a Pull Request, or keep the branch. It carries out the selected path and handles workspace cleanup accordingly.

OriginalShow the original description

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

AI rating90/ 100See how to install

Good for

  • Merging a completed feature locally
  • Pushing a branch and creating a Pull Request
  • Keeping completed work for later integration
  • Cleaning up a workspace after a merge

Overview

What it does

Takes a completed development branch through testing, integration choices, and cleanup. It checks that the full test suite passes, identifies whether work is in the main workspace or a separate worktree, and checks whether it is on a named branch. It then offers a local merge, creation of a Pull Request, or keeping the work as it is, and carries out your choice. After merging, it runs tests again and cleans up the relevant workspace and branch only when they pass.

When it helps

Use it when you need to decide how to integrate completed development work. It also covers keeping a workspace available for review and checking uncommitted files before cleanup.

Example requests

  • “Check the completed changes and show me the integration options.”
  • “Push this branch and create a Pull Request.”

Notes

Requires Git and an environment that can run the project's tests. Failed tests stop the completion process. Creating a Pull Request uses the hosting service's CLI or similar tooling, and the workspace stays available afterward. A detached HEAD, which is not on a named branch, does not get a local merge option. Discarding work requires an explicit request and the exact confirmation discard.

This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.

Objective evaluation

AI rated this skill on four points using only the contents of its SKILL.md. Stars and popularity are not taken into account.

Clear instructionsIs it clear when to use it and what it does?
AGoodIt explicitly covers testing completed implementation, choosing an integration method, and cleaning up afterward.
Concrete stepsAre steps, inputs, outputs, and examples spelled out?
AGoodSteps include environment detection, option menus, and commands for merging and removing worktrees.
SafetyAre sending data, deleting files, and running commands disclosed?
AGoodUsers choose integration; discarding requires typing discard, and deleting uncommitted files requires confirmation.
Easy setupDoes it need few tools or API keys, and are they documented?
BPartly lackingIt uses Git, a test environment, and PR tooling but provides no installation or authentication instructions.

The total counts each point as A = 25, B = 15, C = 5. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 19, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.

Disagree? Request a re-evaluation

Tell us which point is wrong and why. No login needed. We will check it against the SKILL.md, redo the evaluation, and show the result here.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md7.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

Step 1: Verify Tests

Run the project's full test suite (npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...).

If tests fail, report the failures and stop — the menu comes after a green suite:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

If tests pass: continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Detect Environment

GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
# Capture now, while still inside the workspace — Step 5 changes directory
# before cleanup (Step 6) needs this value
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)

This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:

StateMenuCleanup
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo)Standard 3 optionsNo worktree to clean up
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, named branchStandard 3 optionsProvenance-based (see Step 6)
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEADReduced 2 options (no merge)Externally managed — leave in place

Step 3: Determine Base Branch

The base branch is whatever this work forked from — usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from <your best guess> - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.

Step 4: Present Options

Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 3 options:

Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)

Which option?

Detached HEAD — present exactly these 2 options:

Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).

1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)

Which option?

Present the menu exactly as written — concise, with every option coming from the list above. Discarding the work happens only in response to your human partner explicitly asking for it (see "If your human partner asks to discard the work" below). Wait for their answer; the integration decision is theirs.

Step 5: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally

# Get main repo root for CWD safety
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"

# Merge first — verify success before removing anything
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>

# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>

If tests fail on the merged result: stop, leave the worktree and branch in place, and investigate — nothing has been pushed, so the merge is local and recoverable.

Once the merged result is green: clean up the worktree (Step 6), then delete the branch:

git branch -d <feature-branch>

Option 2: Push and Create PR

git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# From a detached HEAD, name the new branch on the remote:
# git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/<new-branch>

Then create the pull/merge request against <base-branch> with the forge's tooling — its CLI if one is available, or the creation URL most forges print when you push — following the repo's PR template and conventions if present, and report the URL to your human partner.

Keep the worktree — your human partner iterates on PR feedback there.

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."

If your human partner asks to discard the work

This path exists only as a response to an explicit request to throw the work away. Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for that exact confirmation. When it arrives:

MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"

Then clean up the worktree (Step 6) and force-delete the branch:

git branch -D <feature-branch>

Step 6: Cleanup Workspace

Runs for Option 1 and confirmed discards. Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree. Both callers have already changed directory to the main repo root — worktree removal must run from outside the worktree — and use the GIT_DIR/GIT_COMMON/WORKTREE_PATH values captured in Step 2, from before that directory change.

If GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON: Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.

If WORKTREE_PATH is under .worktrees/ or worktrees/: Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup:

git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH"
git worktree prune  # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations

If removal is refused (contains modified or untracked files): the worktree holds files that exist nowhere else — uncommitted plans, notes, or scratch work. Never --force on your own initiative. Show your human partner what is at stake and ask:

git -C "$WORKTREE_PATH" status --porcelain -uall
Worktree removal refused — these files were never committed:

<file list>

1. Commit them to <branch> before cleanup
2. Move them into <main repo root>
3. Delete them (unrecoverable)

Which?

Carry out the choice, then remove the worktree.

Otherwise: The host environment owns this workspace — leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it.

Quick Reference

OptionMergePushKeep WorktreeCleanup Branch
1. Merge locallyyes--yes
2. Create PR-yesyes-
3. Keep as-is--yes-
Discard (explicit request only)---yes (force)

Common Rationalizations

ExcuseReality
"Tests passed earlier this session"Run the suite on the tree you are about to integrate. A green run only proves the tree it ran on.
"They obviously want it merged"Integration is your human partner's decision. Present the menu and wait.
"They seem done with this feature — I'll offer to discard it"The menu is complete as written. Discard happens only when your human partner asks for it in so many words.
"'Yeah, get rid of it' counts as confirmation"Only the typed word discard authorizes deletion.
"The PR is up, so the worktree is clutter now"PR feedback gets fixed in that worktree. It stays until the work lands.
"This other worktree looks stale — I'll clean it too"Clean up only worktrees under .worktrees/ or worktrees/. Everything else belongs to the host.
"Removal refused — --force is just finishing the cleanup"The refusal means files exist only in that worktree. --force destroys them permanently. Show your human partner and ask.
"The merged-result failure is probably flaky"A failing merged result stops everything. Branch and worktree stay put while you investigate.
"The base branch is obviously main"Confirm the fork point or ask. Merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.
"The push was rejected — force-push will fix it"A rejected push means the remote moved. Investigate; force-push only on your human partner's explicit request.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

brainstorming

FreeSummaryAI rating 90

Clarifies the purpose, preferences, and constraints of a new feature or project through conversation. When useful, it offers mockups or temporary prototypes, then captures an agreed description or written design before implementation begins.

  • Clarifying the purpose of a new feature
  • Organizing ideas for a talk or business
  • Comparing screen or room layouts visually
obra/superpowers301.7KUpdated Oct 10, 2026

diagnosing-superpowers

FreeSummaryAI rating 90

Examine superpowers session records to document repeated work, departures from plans, delays, and token usage. Produce an evidence-based report with file and line references, and prepare bug-report material when requested.

  • Investigating repeated work or departures from a plan
  • Checking session duration and token usage
  • Tracing whether a skill was invoked
obra/superpowers301.7KUpdated Oct 10, 2026

dispatching-parallel-agents

FreeSummaryAI rating 90

Assign independent bugs or test failures to separate agents that work at the same time. Define each agent’s scope and expected report, then check for conflicting changes and run the full test suite before integrating fixes.

  • Investigating test failures with unrelated causes
  • Fixing independent problems in separate subsystems
  • Defining focused tasks for multiple agents
obra/superpowers301.7KUpdated Oct 10, 2026

executing-plans

FreeSummaryAI rating 90

Carry out an existing implementation plan in one session, task by task. Verify each step with tests, record progress and decisions in a file, and finish with a review of all changes on the branch.

  • Implementing a prepared development plan
  • Executing tasks without implementer subagents
  • Resuming work from a progress record
obra/superpowers301.7KUpdated Oct 10, 2026

receiving-code-review

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Evaluate code review feedback against the actual code, supported environments, and existing behavior. Clarify uncertain requests, respond with technical evidence, and implement valid changes one at a time with tests for each fix.

  • Clarifying ambiguous code review comments
  • Checking whether suggested changes preserve compatibility
  • Assessing whether a requested feature is actually used
obra/superpowers301.7KUpdated Oct 10, 2026

requesting-code-review

FreeSummaryAI rating 90

Requests a code review from a separate agent after implementation or before merging. It provides the change summary, requirements, and commit range, then guides follow-up work according to the severity of the findings.

  • Reviewing a major feature after implementation
  • Checking changes before merging
  • Getting another perspective on a complex bug fix
obra/superpowers301.7KUpdated Oct 10, 2026

See all skills by obra

Report a problem with this skill