accessibility
FreeEnsure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Static code analysis and complexity metrics
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
No separate download: the skill runs the in-repo tool .claude/tools/analysis/project-analyzer/analyzer.mjs.
winget install OpenJS.NodeJS.LTS (Windows), brew install node (macOS).Metrics: Focus on cyclomatic complexity (decision paths), LOC, maintainability index, and duplicate blocks. Use ESLint complexity rule (e.g. "complexity": ["error", 15]) for JS/TS; optional chaining and default params add branches.
Process: Analyze before refactoring; run project-wide then drill into hotspots. Track trends over time (not one-off). Use max-depth, max-lines, max-nested-callbacks, max-params, max-statements alongside complexity.
Hacks: Start with project-analyzer output; filter by file type and threshold. Prioritize files with high complexity and high churn. Disable complexity rule only if you cannot set a sensible limit; prefer lowering the threshold over disabling.
No single cert; aligns with static analysis and ESLint complexity. ESLint: complexity rule, max-depth, max-lines, max-params. Skill data: Cyclomatic complexity, LOC, maintainability, duplicates; analyze before refactor; track hotspots and trends.
Suggested hooks: Pre-commit or CI: run project-analyzer/doctor for health; optional complexity gate. Use with developer (secondary), qa (secondary), code-reviewer (primary).
Workflows: Use with code-reviewer (primary), developer/ qa (secondary), c4-code (primary). Flow: run analyzer → filter hotspots → refactor or add tests. See code-review-workflow.md.
Static code analysis and metrics. 90%+ context savings.
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
| analyze-file | Analyze single file |
| analyze-project | Analyze entire project |
| complexity | Calculate complexity metrics |
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
| loc | Lines of code |
| cyclomatic | Cyclomatic complexity |
| maintainability | Maintainability index |
| duplicates | Find duplicate code |
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
| summary | Get analysis summary |
| hotspots | Find complexity hotspots |
| trends | Analyze metric trends |
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Analyzing only changed files | Misses cross-file complexity accumulation | Run project-wide then filter to changed hot spots |
| Ignoring high-complexity files over time | Gradual degradation invisible in point-in-time analysis | Track weekly trends; alert on any increase |
| Complexity threshold >20 | Research shows defect rate spikes sharply above 20 | Set ESLint complexity rule to ≤15 for enforcement |
| Reporting metrics without action items | Metrics without remediation don't reduce complexity | Attach specific refactoring suggestion per hotspot |
| Running analysis once and ignoring results | Technical debt silently accumulates | Schedule automated weekly analysis with trend reports |
Before starting:
Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing:
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md.claude/context/memory/issues.md.claude/context/memory/decisions.mdASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.