accessibility
FreeEnsure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Validate whether a proposed new artifact is feasible in the current stack before creator workflows run.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Run a fast preflight feasibility check before creating a new agent/skill/workflow/hook/template/schema. This prevents low-value or impossible creator runs.
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Returning PASS without running the duplication check | Creates duplicate artifacts that split agent traffic and inflate catalogs | Always query catalog + registry + filesystem before PASS |
| Returning BLOCK without remediation tasks | Calling agent stalls with no path forward | Include nextActions with specific agents/skills to unblock |
| Skipping the security/creator boundary check | Creator paths may be blocked by governance hooks; silently bypassing them causes runtime failures | Always verify creator skill chain is reachable before PASS |
| Treating WARN as informational only | WARN caveats are not surfaced to the user; creation proceeds with unresolved risks | WARN must be acknowledged explicitly by the caller in its task metadata |
| Running creation steps inside the gate skill | Violates separation of concerns; gate outputs can't be validated independently | Gate outputs only the decision JSON; delegate creation to creator skills |
Use the shared duplicate detection library:
const { checkDuplicate } = require('.claude/lib/creation/duplicate-detector.cjs');
const result = checkDuplicate({
artifactType: artifactType, // from Step 1 classification
name: proposedName,
description: proposedDescription,
});
if (result.decision === 'EXACT_MATCH') {
return {
gate: 'BLOCK',
reason: `Artifact exists at ${result.matchedPath}. Use the ${artifactType}-updater skill instead.`,
};
}
if (result.decision === 'REGISTRY_MATCH') {
return {
gate: 'WARN',
reason: `"${proposedName}" found in ${result.message} but file may be missing. Investigate.`,
};
}
if (result.decision === 'SIMILAR_FOUND') {
return {
gate: 'WARN',
reason: `Similar artifacts found: ${result.candidates.map(c => `${c.name} (${(c.score * 100).toFixed(0)}%)`).join(', ')}. Confirm creation is intentional.`,
};
}
return { gate: 'PASS' };
The 3 detection layers (filesystem, registry/catalog, fuzzy/semantic) are handled internally by the library. See .claude/lib/creation/duplicate-detector.cjs for details.
Run these checks with concrete evidence:
Return one status:
PASS: creation is feasible nowWARN: feasible with clear caveatsBLOCK: not feasible; must resolve blockers firstUse this output shape:
{
"status": "PASS|WARN|BLOCK",
"artifactType": "agent|skill|workflow|hook|template|schema",
"artifactName": "example-name",
"evidence": ["..."],
"blockers": [],
"nextActions": ["..."]
}
If BLOCK, include concrete remediation tasks and recommended target agents.
If PASS or WARN, include exact creator skill chain to run next.
Record feasibility patterns and recurring blockers to .claude/context/memory/learnings.md.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.