Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

doc-generator

Generates comprehensive documentation from code, APIs, and specifications. Creates API documentation, developer guides, architecture docs, and user manuals with examples and tutorials.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (10)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • commands/doc-generator.md113 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs862 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs865 B
  • references/research-requirements.md461 B
  • rules/doc-generator.md489 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json263 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json624 B
  • scripts/main.cjs1.4 KB
  • templates/implementation-template.md187 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Mode: Cognitive/Prompt-Driven — No standalone utility script; use via agent context.

<identity> Documentation Generator Skill - Generates comprehensive documentation from code, APIs, and specifications including API docs, developer guides, architecture documentation, and user manuals. </identity> <capabilities> - Generating API documentation - Creating developer guides - Documenting architecture - Creating user manuals - Generating OpenAPI/Swagger specs - Updating existing documentation </capabilities> <instructions> <execution_process>

Step 1: Identify Documentation Type

Determine documentation type:

  • API Documentation: Endpoint references
  • Developer Guide: Setup and usage
  • Architecture Docs: System overview
  • User Manual: Feature guides

Step 2: Extract Information

Gather documentation content:

  • Read code and comments
  • Analyze API endpoints
  • Extract examples
  • Understand architecture

Step 3: Generate Documentation

Create documentation:

  • Follow documentation templates
  • Include examples
  • Add troubleshooting
  • Create clear structure

Step 4: Validate Documentation

Validate quality:

  • Check completeness
  • Verify examples work
  • Ensure clarity
  • Validate links </execution_process>
<integration> **Integration with Technical Writer Agent**: - Uses this skill for documentation generation - Ensures documentation quality - Validates completeness

Integration with Developer Agent:

  • Generates API documentation
  • Creates inline documentation
  • Updates docs with code changes </integration>

<best_practices>

  1. Extract from Code: Use code as source of truth
  2. Include Examples: Provide working examples
  3. Keep Updated: Sync docs with code
  4. Clear Structure: Organize logically
  5. User-Focused: Write for users, not system </best_practices> </instructions>
<examples> <formatting_example> **API Documentation**
# Users API

## Endpoints

### GET /api/users

List all users with pagination.

**Query Parameters:**

- `page` (number): Page number (default: 1)
- `limit` (number): Items per page (default: 10)

**Response:**

```json
{
  "data": [
    {
      "id": "uuid",
      "email": "user@example.com",
      "name": "User Name"
    }
  ],
  "pagination": {
    "page": 1,
    "limit": 10,
    "total": 100
  }
}
```

Example:

curl -X GET "http://localhost:3000/api/users?page=1&limit=10"
</formatting_example>

<formatting_example>
**Developer Guide**

```markdown
# Developer Guide

## Getting Started

### Prerequisites
- Node.js 18+
- pnpm 8+

### Installation
```bash
pnpm install

Development

pnpm dev

Architecture

[Architecture overview]

Development Workflow

[Development process]

</formatting_example>
</examples>

<examples>
<usage_example>
**Example Commands**:

Generate API documentation

Generate API documentation for app/api/users

Generate developer guide

Generate developer guide for this project

Generate architecture docs

Generate architecture documentation

Generate OpenAPI spec

Generate OpenAPI specification from API routes

</usage_example>
</examples>

## Iron Laws

1. **ALWAYS** extract documentation from code as the source of truth — never write documentation that describes how you wish the code worked rather than how it actually works.
2. **NEVER** publish documentation with non-runnable examples — every code example must be copy-paste ready and verified to work before the documentation is written.
3. **ALWAYS** structure documentation with the progressive disclosure pattern (Setup → Quick Start → Reference → Troubleshooting) — readers need orientation before details.
4. **NEVER** document internal implementation details that consumers don't need to know — documentation of private internals creates false contracts and maintenance burden.
5. **ALWAYS** regenerate documentation when the code it describes changes — stale documentation is worse than no documentation because it actively misleads users.

## Anti-Patterns

| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| No working code examples | Users can't understand how to use the API without runnable examples | Include minimal copy-paste examples verified to work for every public API |
| Aspirational documentation (describes intended behavior) | Creates false contracts; users file bugs when docs don't match code | Read the actual implementation first; document only observed behavior |
| Documenting private/internal APIs | Creates implicit dependencies; refactoring breaks "documented" behavior | Only document public APIs; mark internal functions with `@internal` if needed |
| Monolithic reference dumps without Quick Start | Users abandon before finding what they need | Always include a Quick Start section with the simplest possible working example |
| Documentation in a separate PR from code change | Docs drift immediately; often abandoned | Require documentation updates in the same PR as API changes |

## Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

**Before starting:**
Read `.claude/context/memory/learnings.md`

**After completing:**
- New pattern -> `.claude/context/memory/learnings.md`
- Issue found -> `.claude/context/memory/issues.md`
- Decision made -> `.claude/context/memory/decisions.md`

> ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

See all skills by oimiragieo

Report a problem with this skill