accessibility
FreeEnsure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Verify that task outputs actually achieve stated goals through 4 progressive levels of verification
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Verify that task outputs actually achieve stated goals through 4 progressive levels of verification. Works backward from the goal to verify each artifact exists, is substantive, is wired into the system, and passes functional tests.
Skill({ skill: 'goal-backward-verification' });
Invoke when:
Verify the expected output artifact is present on disk.
# Check file existence
test -f <expected_path> && echo "PASS: File exists" || echo "FAIL: File missing"
Pass: File exists at expected path. Fail: File missing — task did not produce expected output.
Verify the file contains real content, not a stub or placeholder.
Checks:
# Count substantive lines (non-empty, non-comment)
grep -cvE '^\s*(//|#|\*|$|TODO|PLACEHOLDER|FIXME|STUB)' <file>
Pass: File has substantive content (>10 real lines). Fail: Stub detected — file exists but contains no real implementation.
Verify the artifact is imported, referenced, or registered by the system.
Checks:
.cjs/.js modules: at least 1 require() or import reference in other filesskills: frontmatter or skill-index.json# Search for references to the artifact
grep -r "require.*<module-name>" .claude/ --include="*.cjs" --include="*.js" | grep -v node_modules | grep -v _archive
Pass: At least 1 external reference found. Fail: Orphaned artifact — exists but nothing uses it.
Verify the artifact passes its associated tests end-to-end.
Checks:
tests/<mirror-path>/<name>.test.cjs)node --test <test-file># Run associated tests
node --test tests/<path>/<artifact>.test.cjs
Pass: All tests pass (exit code 0). Fail: Test failures detected — artifact may be broken.
All 4 levels must pass. Any failure at any level blocks the verification.
All 4 levels are checked, but failures produce warnings instead of blocking. Useful for incremental development where wiring may not be complete yet.
Set mode via environment variable:
GOAL_VERIFICATION_MODE=strict # or advisory
{
"artifact": "path/to/file",
"levels": {
"exists": { "passed": true },
"substantive": { "passed": true, "lines": 45 },
"wired": { "passed": true, "references": ["path/to/importer.cjs"] },
"functional": { "passed": false, "reason": "2 tests failed", "exitCode": 1 }
},
"verdict": "PARTIAL",
"mode": "advisory",
"passedLevels": 3,
"totalLevels": 4
}
Verdict values:
PASS — All 4 levels passedPARTIAL — Some levels passed, some failedFAIL — Level 1 (Exists) failed (nothing else to check)Read the task's acceptance criteria or plan file to identify expected output artifacts (files, schemas, skills, hooks).
For each artifact, run Levels 1-4 in order. Stop early if Level 1 fails (no point checking substantiveness of a missing file).
Generate structured JSON output with per-artifact, per-level results. Include the overall verdict.
In advisory mode, log warnings to session-gap-log for reflection-agent consumption. In strict mode, return FAIL verdict to block completion.
verification-before-completion — Evidence-based completion gatesproactive-audit — Framework health checkstdd — Test-driven development ensuring Level 4 passesNo reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.