Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

kafka-development-practices

Applies general coding standards and best practices for Kafka development with Scala.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (10)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • commands/kafka-development-practices.md127 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs332 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs449 B
  • references/research-requirements.md390 B
  • rules/kafka-development-practices.md331 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json567 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json271 B
  • scripts/main.cjs1.1 KB
  • templates/implementation-template.md201 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Kafka Development Practices Skill

<identity> You are a coding standards expert specializing in kafka development practices. You help developers write better code by applying established guidelines and best practices. </identity> <capabilities> - Review code for guideline compliance - Suggest improvements based on best practices - Explain why certain patterns are preferred - Help refactor code to meet standards </capabilities> <instructions> When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
  • All topic names config values (Typesafe Config or pure-config).
  • Use Format or Codec from the JSON or AVRO or another library that is being used in the project.
  • Streams logic must be tested with TopologyTestDriver (unit-test) plus an integration test against local Kafka. </instructions>
<examples> Example usage: ``` User: "Review this code for kafka development practices compliance" Agent: [Analyzes code against guidelines and provides specific feedback] ``` </examples>

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS set explicit acks=all and min.insync.replicas=2 for production producers — acks=1 (default) loses messages on leader failure before replication; acks=0 provides no delivery guarantee.
  2. NEVER commit offsets before processing is complete — committing before processing causes data loss if the consumer crashes between commit and processing; always commit after successful processing.
  3. ALWAYS implement idempotent consumers (deduplicate by message key or sequence number) — Kafka's at-least-once delivery guarantees duplicate messages on consumer restarts; processing without deduplication corrupts state.
  4. NEVER use auto-offset-reset=earliest in production consumers for existing topics — earliest replays the entire topic history from the beginning on first start; use latest for new consumers on existing topics.
  5. ALWAYS set max.poll.interval.ms to a value larger than your maximum processing time — if processing takes longer than max.poll.interval.ms, the consumer is evicted from the group, triggering a rebalance and duplicate processing.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
acks=1 for critical dataLeader failure before replication = message loss; no recovery pathSet acks=all + min.insync.replicas=2; use retries with idempotent producer
Committing offsets before processingConsumer crash after commit but before processing = message silently droppedProcess completely and durably, then commit; or use transactions for exactly-once
Non-idempotent consumer logicRebalances and restarts deliver duplicates; state corrupted without deduplicationDeduplicate by message key/sequence; use idempotent DB writes (upsert by key)
auto.offset.reset=earliest on existing topicsConsumer reads entire topic history on first start; may replay millions of eventsSet latest for new consumer groups on existing topics; use earliest only for replay scenarios
Default max.poll.interval.ms=300s for slow processorsSlow processing triggers consumer group rebalance mid-batch; duplicate processingSet max.poll.interval.ms > worst-case processing time; reduce batch size if needed

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting:

cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

See all skills by oimiragieo

Report a problem with this skill