Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

schema-updater

Research-backed JSON Schema refresh workflow for updating existing schemas with validation checkpoints and cross-reference verification.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Schema Updater

Overview

Use this skill to refresh an existing JSON Schema safely: research current best practices, compare against the artifact it validates, generate a TDD patch backlog, apply updates, and verify ecosystem integration.

When to Use

  • Schema no longer matches the artifact structure it validates
  • New fields added to skills/agents/hooks/workflows but schema not updated
  • Reflection flags schema validation failures
  • User asks to audit/refresh an existing schema

The Iron Law

Never update a schema blindly. Every refresh must be evidence-backed, TDD-gated, and integration-validated.

Workflow

Step 0: Evaluate Current State

  1. Read the schema file and understand what it validates
  2. Find the artifacts it validates (skills, agents, hooks, workflows)
  3. Compare schema required fields against actual artifact structure
  4. Identify gaps: missing fields, wrong types, stale descriptions

Step 1: Research Best Practices

  1. Read .claude/schemas/CLAUDE.md for schema conventions
  2. Review similar schemas for patterns
  3. Check JSON Schema Draft-07 specification compliance
  4. Use Skill({ skill: 'research-synthesis' }) if external research needed

Step 2: Generate Patch Backlog

  1. List specific changes needed
  2. Prioritize: required field additions > type corrections > description updates
  3. Ensure backward compatibility where possible

Step 3: Apply Updates

  1. Write or update validation tests first (RED phase)
  2. Apply schema changes (GREEN phase)
  3. Refactor for clarity (REFACTOR phase)
  4. Use Edit tool — never rewrite the entire file

Step 4: Verify Integration

  1. Verify schema is valid JSON Schema Draft-07
  2. Verify $id and $schema fields are present and correct
  3. Validate at least 3 existing artifacts against the updated schema
  4. Run pnpm lint:fix && pnpm format
  5. Run schema validation tests

Step 5: Record

  1. Log changes via MemoryRecord if significant
  2. Update CHANGELOG.md entry

Domain-Specific Validation

  • Schema MUST be valid JSON Schema Draft-07 ($schema: "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#")
  • Schema MUST have $id field matching its file path
  • Schema MUST be referenced by at least one validator or test
  • Required fields MUST match actual artifact structure
  • Default values MUST match framework conventions

Anti-Patterns

  • Adding required fields that break existing valid artifacts
  • Removing fields without checking all consumers
  • Using features beyond Draft-07 (e.g., Draft-2020-12 prefixItems)
  • Making the schema so strict it rejects valid edge cases

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

See all skills by oimiragieo

Report a problem with this skill