Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

security-scanning

Automated security scanning pipeline covering SAST (Semgrep), SCA (OWASP dependency-check), SBOM generation (Syft), vulnerability scanning (Grype), and secrets detection (detect-secrets). Invoked by security-architect for pre-commit gates, CI integration, and finding triage.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Works withDocker
See how to install

Files included (10)

  • SKILL.md7.7 KB
  • commands/security-scanning.md117 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs187 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs293 B
  • references/research-requirements.md292 B
  • rules/security-scanning.md293 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json496 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json261 B
  • scripts/main.cjs1.0 KB
  • templates/implementation-template.md191 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Security Scanning Skill

Automated security scanning pipeline: SAST, SCA, SBOM, and secrets detection.

Tools

ToolPurposeInstall
SemgrepSAST — static analysispip install semgrep
OWASP dependency-checkSCA — known CVEs in depsbrew install dependency-check
SyftSBOM generationbrew install anchore/syft/syft
GrypeVulnerability scanner (uses SBOM)brew install anchore/grype/grype
detect-secretsSecrets detectionpip install detect-secrets

Phase 1: SAST — Static Analysis (Semgrep)

# Run default ruleset
semgrep --config auto .

# Run security-focused rules only
semgrep --config p/security-audit .

# Run OWASP Top 10 rules
semgrep --config p/owasp-top-ten .

# Output JSON for CI
semgrep --config auto --json --output semgrep-results.json .

# Fail CI on any HIGH or CRITICAL finding
semgrep --config auto --severity ERROR .

Recommended rulesets:

  • p/security-audit — broad security audit
  • p/owasp-top-ten — OWASP Top 10 coverage
  • p/javascript — JS/TS patterns (injection, XSS, prototype pollution)
  • p/python — Python patterns (SQL injection, insecure deserialization)
  • p/secrets — hardcoded credential detection

Phase 2: SCA — Software Composition Analysis (OWASP dependency-check)

# Scan Node.js project
dependency-check --project myapp --scan . --format JSON --out dependency-check-report

# Scan with NVD API key (avoids rate limiting)
dependency-check --project myapp --scan . \
  --nvdApiKey "$NVD_API_KEY" \
  --format HTML --out reports/

# CI integration: fail on CVSS >= 7.0
dependency-check --project myapp --scan . \
  --failOnCVSS 7 \
  --format JSON --out reports/

# Suppress false positives
dependency-check --project myapp --scan . \
  --suppression suppressions.xml

Phase 3: SBOM Generation (Syft)

# Generate SBOM for current directory
syft . -o spdx-json > sbom.spdx.json

# SBOM from Docker image
syft my-image:latest -o cyclonedx-json > sbom.cyclonedx.json

# Multiple formats
syft . -o spdx-json -o cyclonedx-json -o syft-json

# Sign SBOM with cosign
cosign attest --predicate sbom.spdx.json --type spdx $IMAGE_DIGEST

Phase 4: Vulnerability Scanning (Grype)

# Scan from SBOM
grype sbom:sbom.spdx.json

# Scan Docker image directly
grype my-image:latest

# Scan current directory
grype .

# Fail on CRITICAL or HIGH
grype sbom:sbom.spdx.json --fail-on high

# Output JSON for CI
grype sbom:sbom.spdx.json -o json > grype-results.json

# Filter by severity
grype sbom:sbom.spdx.json --only-fixed

Phase 5: Secrets Detection (detect-secrets)

# Create baseline (initial scan)
detect-secrets scan > .secrets.baseline

# Audit baseline interactively
detect-secrets audit .secrets.baseline

# Scan for new secrets (CI check)
detect-secrets scan --baseline .secrets.baseline

# Add to pre-commit hook
# .pre-commit-config.yaml:
# - repo: https://github.com/Yelp/detect-secrets
#   rev: v1.4.0
#   hooks:
#   - id: detect-secrets
#     args: ['--baseline', '.secrets.baseline']

Pre-Commit Gate

# .pre-commit-config.yaml
repos:
  - repo: https://github.com/returntocorp/semgrep
    rev: v1.58.0
    hooks:
      - id: semgrep
        args: ['--config', 'p/security-audit', '--error']

  - repo: https://github.com/Yelp/detect-secrets
    rev: v1.4.0
    hooks:
      - id: detect-secrets
        args: ['--baseline', '.secrets.baseline']

CI Integration (GitHub Actions)

# .github/workflows/security.yml
name: Security Scan
on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  security:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: SAST (Semgrep)
        uses: returntocorp/semgrep-action@v1
        with:
          config: p/security-audit

      - name: Generate SBOM
        uses: anchore/sbom-action@v0
        with:
          format: spdx-json
          output-file: sbom.spdx.json

      - name: Vulnerability Scan (Grype)
        uses: anchore/scan-action@v3
        with:
          sbom: sbom.spdx.json
          fail-build: true
          severity-cutoff: high

      - name: Secrets Detection
        run: |
          pip install detect-secrets
          detect-secrets scan --baseline .secrets.baseline

Finding Triage Workflow

HIGH/CRITICAL findings:
  → Create security issue immediately
  → Assign to security-architect for review
  → Block merge until resolved or suppressed with justification

MEDIUM findings:
  → Log in security backlog
  → Review in next sprint
  → Add to suppression file with justification if false positive

LOW/INFO findings:
  → Weekly review
  → Suppress with justification or accept risk

Suppression Patterns

Semgrep (inline):

# nosemgrep: python.lang.security.audit.hardcoded-password.hardcoded-password
PASSWORD = os.environ["PASSWORD"]

detect-secrets (.secrets.baseline):

# Mark as false positive during audit
detect-secrets audit .secrets.baseline
# Press 'n' to mark as not a secret

Grype (grype.yaml):

ignore:
  - vulnerability: CVE-2021-44228
    reason: 'Not affected — log4j not in classpath'

When to Invoke

  • Skill({ skill: 'security-scanning' }) — before any security review
  • Pre-commit: automatically via pre-commit hooks
  • CI: on every PR targeting main/release branches
  • Release gates: mandatory before any production deployment

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS scan before merging to main — no exceptions for "quick fixes"
  2. NEVER suppress a HIGH/CRITICAL finding without documented justification and security-architect approval
  3. ALWAYS generate and store SBOM for every container image pushed to production
  4. NEVER commit secrets baseline with unmarked findings — audit every detected secret
  5. ALWAYS update SBOM and re-scan after any dependency change

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Skipping SCA for "known" depsCVEs are discovered continuouslyAlways run SCA; pin versions + audit
Suppressing all Semgrep findingsBreaks the safety netSuppress only with justification + owner
Not rotating detected secretsSecret is already compromisedRotate immediately, then suppress
SBOM generated but not scannedSBOM alone adds no security valueAlways run Grype against generated SBOM
Scanning only in CIDevelopers get slow feedback loopAdd pre-commit hooks for SAST + secrets

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Issue found -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Decision made -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

oimiragieo/agent-studio42Updated Jul 14, 2026

See all skills by oimiragieo

Report a problem with this skill