Analyze meeting transcripts to extract decisions, action items, blockers, sentiment, and generate follow-up emails. Use when user provides meeting notes, transcripts, or recordings and needs structured summaries or action tracking.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Transform meeting transcripts into actionable insights, decisions, and follow-ups.
Activate when the user:
Extract Meeting Metadata
Identify Decisions Made
Extract Action Items
Identify Blockers and Risks
Analyze Discussion Sentiment
Extract Key Topics Discussed
Generate Follow-Up Communications
# Meeting Summary: [Title]
**Date**: [Date] | **Participants**: [Names]
## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of meeting purpose and outcome]
## Decisions Made
1. **[Decision]**
- Owner: [Name]
- Rationale: [Why]
- Status: Final / Needs approval
## Action Items
| Priority | Action | Owner | Deadline | Status |
|----------|--------|-------|----------|--------|
| High | [Task] | [Name] | [Date] | Not started |
| Medium | [Task] | [Name] | [Date] | Not started |
## Blockers & Risks
1. **[Blocker]** - [Impact] - Needs: [Action]
2. **[Risk]** - [Mitigation plan]
## Key Discussion Points
- [Topic 1]: [Summary]
- [Topic 2]: [Summary]
## Open Questions
1. [Question] - Owner: [Who will answer]
## Sentiment Analysis
- **Overall Tone**: [productive/tense/etc.]
- **Team Alignment**: [high/medium/low]
- **Concerns Raised**: [Summary]
## Follow-Up Email Draft
Subject: Action Items from [Meeting Title] - [Date]
Hi team,
Thanks for joining today's [meeting type]. Here are our key outcomes:
**Decisions:**
- [Decision 1]
**Your Action Items:**
[Name]: [Task] by [Date]
**Blockers:**
- [Blocker] - please [action]
Next meeting: [Date/Time]
Best,
[Your name]
User: "Analyze this standup transcript" Response: Extract blockers mentioned → List action items per person → Flag impediments → Note team velocity concerns → Generate summary with focus on blockers
User: "Create action items from this product planning meeting" Response: Identify all decisions (feature prioritization) → Extract action items (design mockups, tech spec) → Assign owners → Set deadlines → Create tracking table → Draft follow-up email
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Audit websites for accessibility issues and WCAG compliance. Use when checking accessibility, fixing a11y issues, or ensuring WCAG compliance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Deploy a 2-layer parallel agent hierarchy for large, parallelizable work — big refactors, multi-file migrations, codebase-wide audits, bulk generation. A top-tier commander (Fable or Opus) orchestrates the swarms; the user picks a power level (Max Power / Heavy / Balanced / Economy) that sets the Opus/Sonnet/Haiku model mix per layer. Layer 1 is 3-50+ specialist agents, each with its own full context window; Layer 2 is 2+ sub-agents per member. Includes git safety, tiered sizing, a pre-deploy gate, phantom-completion checks, and multi-wave follow-up.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use to test whether an AI agent, prompt, or skill actually works before or after it ships — build a small eval set, score runs, and catch regressions when the prompt or model changes. Trigger when the user asks whether a prompt is good, wants to compare models or versions, sees inconsistent agent output, or is about to put an agent in front of customers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Deploys swarms of sub-agents for massive parallel data processing tasks. Unlike agent-army (which is for code changes), this is for DATA tasks -- processing 1000 documents, analyzing datasets, bulk content generation. Configurable swarm size, task distribution, result aggregation, progress tracking, and error recovery.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Designs and deploys custom agent teams for specific business workflows. Interactive discovery of business processes, then generates complete team configurations with specialized agent roles, tool access, communication protocols, and handoff rules.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Agent-to-Agent (A2A) communication protocol. Connect two or more Claude agents that pass messages, share context, delegate tasks, and collaborate. Implements structured handoffs, shared memory, and multi-agent conversations.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.