Analyze Reddit threads for sentiment, consensus opinions, top arguments, and discussion patterns. Use this when users want to understand Reddit community opinions, analyze discussions, or gather insights from subreddit conversations.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Extract deep insights from Reddit discussions including sentiment, key arguments, and community consensus.
Given a Reddit thread URL or a question about Reddit opinions, analyze the discussion comprehensively to surface meaningful patterns and insights.
Use WebFetch to load the Reddit thread and extract:
Determine the dominant sentiment and emotional tone:
Identify the most impactful points:
Top Arguments in Favor (3-5 points):
Top Arguments Against (3-5 points):
Expert or Verified Opinions:
Determine what the community agrees on:
Flag heavily debated points:
Format the analysis clearly:
# Reddit Analysis: [Thread Title]
## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of the discussion and main takeaway]
## Overall Sentiment
- **Dominant Sentiment**: Positive/Negative/Neutral/Mixed (X%)
- **Emotional Tone**: [excited/frustrated/skeptical/etc.]
- **Community Alignment**: High/Medium/Low
## Top Arguments
### In Favor
1. **[Main point]** (+XXX score)
> "[Direct quote from comment]"
- [Brief explanation of reasoning]
2. **[Main point]** (+XXX score)
> "[Direct quote]"
### Against
1. **[Main point]** (+XXX score)
> "[Direct quote]"
## Community Consensus
- [Point most people agree on]
- [Another consensus point]
## Controversial Topics
- [Divisive issue] - Community split roughly 50/50
- [Another debate point]
## Notable Insights
- **Expert Opinion**: [Quote from verified expert] (+XXX)
- **Surprising Take**: [Unexpected perspective that gained traction]
- **Most Helpful**: [Most practical or actionable advice]
## Key Quotes
> "[Memorable quote]" - u/username (+XXX score)
> "[Another impactful quote]" - u/username (+XXX score)
## Discussion Quality
- Civility: High/Medium/Low
- Depth: Superficial/Moderate/Deep
- Evidence-based: Yes/No/Mixed
User: "What does Reddit think about the new iPhone?"
Analysis steps:
Remember: Focus on substance over noise. Prioritize well-reasoned arguments over emotional reactions.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Audit websites for accessibility issues and WCAG compliance. Use when checking accessibility, fixing a11y issues, or ensuring WCAG compliance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Deploy a 2-layer parallel agent hierarchy for large, parallelizable work — big refactors, multi-file migrations, codebase-wide audits, bulk generation. A top-tier commander (Fable or Opus) orchestrates the swarms; the user picks a power level (Max Power / Heavy / Balanced / Economy) that sets the Opus/Sonnet/Haiku model mix per layer. Layer 1 is 3-50+ specialist agents, each with its own full context window; Layer 2 is 2+ sub-agents per member. Includes git safety, tiered sizing, a pre-deploy gate, phantom-completion checks, and multi-wave follow-up.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use to test whether an AI agent, prompt, or skill actually works before or after it ships — build a small eval set, score runs, and catch regressions when the prompt or model changes. Trigger when the user asks whether a prompt is good, wants to compare models or versions, sees inconsistent agent output, or is about to put an agent in front of customers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Deploys swarms of sub-agents for massive parallel data processing tasks. Unlike agent-army (which is for code changes), this is for DATA tasks -- processing 1000 documents, analyzing datasets, bulk content generation. Configurable swarm size, task distribution, result aggregation, progress tracking, and error recovery.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Designs and deploys custom agent teams for specific business workflows. Interactive discovery of business processes, then generates complete team configurations with specialized agent roles, tool access, communication protocols, and handoff rules.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Agent-to-Agent (A2A) communication protocol. Connect two or more Claude agents that pass messages, share context, delegate tasks, and collaborate. Implements structured handoffs, shared memory, and multi-agent conversations.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.