Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

gpt-5-4-prompting

Compose compact, structured prompts for coding, debugging, review, and research with Codex or GPT-5.4. This internal skill defines task scope, completion criteria, output format, verification steps, and evidence requirements using consistent XML tags.

OriginalShow the original description

Internal guidance for composing Codex and GPT-5.4 prompts for coding, review, diagnosis, and research tasks inside the Codex Claude Code plugin

See how to install

Good for

  • Define implementation scope and completion criteria
  • Include verification steps in debugging requests
  • Specify evidence requirements for code reviews
  • Set citation rules for research requests

Files included (4)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB
  • references/codex-prompt-antipatterns.md1.5 KB
  • references/codex-prompt-recipes.md4.1 KB
  • references/prompt-blocks.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

GPT-5.4 Prompting

Use this skill when codex:codex-rescue needs to ask Codex or another GPT-5.4-based workflow for help.

Prompt Codex like an operator, not a collaborator. Keep prompts compact and block-structured with XML tags. State the task, the output contract, the follow-through defaults, and the small set of extra constraints that matter.

Core rules:

  • Prefer one clear task per Codex run. Split unrelated asks into separate runs.
  • Tell Codex what done looks like. Do not assume it will infer the desired end state.
  • Add explicit grounding and verification rules for any task where unsupported guesses would hurt quality.
  • Prefer better prompt contracts over raising reasoning or adding long natural-language explanations.
  • Use XML tags consistently so the prompt has stable internal structure.

Default prompt recipe:

  • <task>: the concrete job and the relevant repository or failure context.
  • <structured_output_contract> or <compact_output_contract>: exact shape, ordering, and brevity requirements.
  • <default_follow_through_policy>: what Codex should do by default instead of asking routine questions.
  • <verification_loop> or <completeness_contract>: required for debugging, implementation, or risky fixes.
  • <grounding_rules> or <citation_rules>: required for review, research, or anything that could drift into unsupported claims.

When to add blocks:

  • Coding or debugging: add completeness_contract, verification_loop, and missing_context_gating.
  • Review or adversarial review: add grounding_rules, structured_output_contract, and dig_deeper_nudge.
  • Research or recommendation tasks: add research_mode and citation_rules.
  • Write-capable tasks: add action_safety so Codex stays narrow and avoids unrelated refactors.

How to choose prompt shape:

  • Use built-in review or adversarial-review commands when the job is reviewing local git changes. Those prompts already carry the review contract.
  • Use task when the task is diagnosis, planning, research, or implementation and you need to control the prompt more directly.
  • Use task --resume-last for follow-up instructions on the same Codex thread. Send only the delta instruction instead of restating the whole prompt unless the direction changed materially.

Working rules:

  • Prefer explicit prompt contracts over vague nudges.
  • Use stable XML tag names that match the block names from the reference file.
  • Do not raise reasoning or complexity first. Tighten the prompt and verification rules before escalating.
  • Ask Codex for brief, outcome-based progress updates only when the task is long-running or tool-heavy.
  • Keep claims anchored to observed evidence. If something is a hypothesis, say so.

Prompt assembly checklist:

  1. Define the exact task and scope in <task>.
  2. Choose the smallest output contract that still makes the answer easy to use.
  3. Decide whether Codex should keep going by default or stop for missing high-risk details.
  4. Add verification, grounding, and safety tags only where the task needs them.
  5. Remove redundant instructions before sending the prompt.

Reusable blocks live in references/prompt-blocks.md. Concrete end-to-end templates live in references/codex-prompt-recipes.md. Common failure modes to avoid live in references/codex-prompt-antipatterns.md.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Forward tasks from Claude Code's rescue subagent to Codex through a helper script. This internal skill handles model and effort options, fresh or resumed runs, and write access, then returns the helper's output unchanged.

  • Hand off diagnosis or implementation work to Codex
  • Resume a previous Codex request
  • Start a fresh Codex run
openai/codex-plugin-cc34.4KUpdated Jul 8, 2026

Present results returned by a Codex helper while preserving findings, severity, file references, and uncertainty. This internal guidance also covers reporting edited files, failed runs, and setup requirements, with user confirmation before fixing review findings.

  • Present review findings in order of severity
  • Keep observed evidence separate from inferences
  • Report files changed by Codex
openai/codex-plugin-cc34.4KUpdated Jul 8, 2026

See all skills by openai

Report a problem with this skill