Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

rsi-phase2-full

RSI Phase 2: Full learned proposal integration

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

RSI Phase 2: Full Learned Proposal Integration

Overview

Extend propose_improvement() to accept optional model= parameter and integrate learned proposals from 2B model with safety-rule validation.

Architecture

propose_improvement(target, content, model=None)

ALWAYS run first: Rule-based proposals (P1-P7 expanded)

  • P1: CYCLE_SECONDS timing (>300s → suggest 300)
  • P1b: Function-level max_tokens defaults
  • P2: max_tokens too small (<100 → suggest 200), both module + function level
  • P2b: Duplicate rejection of capacity-fn proposals
  • P5: Duplicate module-level import dedup
  • P3: Missing error context in except blocks
  • P4: Stale comment fixes
  • P6: Function signatures without type hints
  • P7: Learned proposals from 2B model (NEW - only if model provided)

IF model is provided:

  1. Construct prompt with target file + current content (first 2000 chars)
  2. Call model via localhost:8081 with:
    • Model: mini-openamer
    • Temperature: 0.7
    • Max tokens: 300
    • Prompt: "You are OpenAmer improving its own code. Target: {target}. Find ONE improvement: make code better, don't break compilation, don't lose bindings. Return: (kind, old_pattern, new_pattern, reason) OR None"
  3. Parse response as 4-tuple: (kind, old, new, reason)
  4. Validate: a. old pattern exists in content (string old in content) b. Module bindings preserved (AST compare: lost symbols ≤ 2) c. kind in allowed set: {"capacity","timing","capacity-fn","logging","comment-fix","hinting","func-param"} d. reason is non-empty string
  5. IF ALL validation passes: ADD to proposals list
  6. IF ANY validation fails: SKIP (rules still work fine)

Safety never violated:

  • Never break compilation (sandbox py_compile test always runs in apply_and_test)
  • Never lose critical bindings (AST gate, max 2 symbols lost allowed)
  • Never accept pattern that doesn't exist in content
  • Always have non-empty reason

_learned_proposal(target, content, model) Helper

  • Constructs prompt, calls model, parses response, validates, returns tuple or None
  • Catches all exceptions soft - never crashes the cron job

Integration with improve_once()

proposals = propose_improvement(target, content)  # rules only
# THEN, if model available:
if model is not None:
    learned = _learned_proposal(target, content, model)
    if learned:
        # Validate one more time with apply_and_test gates
        proposals.append(learned)
# Then: sandbox, test, switch, log as before

Proposal Kinds (expanded from Phase 1)

  • "capacity": max_tokens increase (module level)
  • "timing": CYCLE_SECONDS decrease
  • "capacity-fn": function-level max_tokens defaults
  • "logging": except block + print error context
  • "comment-fix": stale comment corrections
  • "hinting": add type hints to function signatures
  • "func-param": function parameter pattern optimization
  • "learned": NEW - model-generated improvements (validated by above gates)

Success Metrics (Phase 2)

  • ≥1 learned proposal accepted per 10 rotation cycles
  • 0 compilation failures from learned proposals
  • 0 binding-loss incidents from learned proposals (>2 lost symbols = reject)
  • Proposal acceptance rate stabilizes at 20-30% (model learns what works)
  • Phase 3 transition: ≥5 accepted per 10 cycles → extract templates → build permanent rule library

Rollback

  • Existing git/shutil mechanism covers it
  • If learned proposal causes issues: git checkout -- target_file
  • No special handling needed - existing apply_and_test() rollback infrastructure

Phase 3 Transition (1 Monat)

When learned proposals reach ≥5 accepted per 10 cycles:

  1. Extract successful pattern templates from accepted learned proposals
  2. Convert successful learned patterns into new permanent rule-based patterns (P8, P9, etc.)
  3. Build pattern library from model-learned improvements
  4. Some learned patterns become permanent rules, reducing model dependency
  5. Phase 3: Cross-Domain Metasketart Extraction (fähigkeitenübergreifendes Extrahieren)

Risks & Mitigations

RiskMitigation
Model generates broken codeValidation gates (compilation test, binding check, pattern existence)
Model learns bad patternsHuman review of first 20 accepted proposals; acceptance rate monitoring
Performance degradationOnly run learned proposals every N cron cycles (e.g., every 3rd)
Model unavailableGraceful fallback: rules only, log "model_unavailable" in improvements.jsonl
Prompt injection in model outputStrict output format validation (4-tuple required, kind in allowed set)

File Locations

  • Core: ~/AppData/Local/openamer-laptop/scripts/training/self_improve.py (enhanced propose_improvement())
  • Skill: ~/AppData/Local/openamer-laptop/skills/rsi-phase2-full/SKILL.md (documentation)
  • World Model: ~/AppData/Local/openamer-laptop/memory/world_model.jsonl (phase2 design log entry)
  • Logging: ~/AppData/Local/openamer-laptop/improvements.jsonl (all proposal attempts logged)

Phase 2 Implementation Checklist

  • Enhance propose_improvement() to accept optional model= parameter
  • Implement _learned_proposal() with prompt engineering and model call
  • Add validation gates (pattern exist, bindings ≤2 lost, kind allowed, reason non-empty)
  • Integrate with improve_once() - learned proposals run after rules
  • Test with model available (localhost:8081) and not available (graceful fallback)
  • Log all learned proposal attempts to improvements.jsonl
  • Track acceptance rate over first 50 rotation cycles
  • Document accepted vs rejected patterns for Phase 3 analysis

Phase 3 Transition Trigger

Mathematische Bedingung: accepted_learned / total_learned_attempts >= 0.5 (mindestens 5 von 10 Zyklen akzeptiert)

Bei Trigger:

  1. Muster-Extraktion aus akzeptierten learned proposals
  2. Neue permanente Regeln P8, P9 etc. generieren
  3. Pattern Library aktualisieren
  4. Akzeptanzrate monitoring fortsetzen
  5. Phase 3: Cross-Domain Metasketart Extraction starten PYEOF

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Build integrated IS/BS/CF financial workbooks in Excel.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openamer/openamer8Updated Oct 21, 2026

Run and grow the OpenAmer Agent-to-Agent swarm: identity, trust, node-to-node ask, signed skill/insight sharing, and the autonomous self-learning loop.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openamer/openamer8Updated Oct 21, 2026

Use for A/B experiments on OpenAmer configs and skills.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openamer/openamer8Updated Oct 21, 2026

Roleplay a hostile user to find and triage UX pain points.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openamer/openamer8Updated Oct 21, 2026

Agent mesh: master/worker nodes, HTTP delegation, heartbeat.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openamer/openamer8Updated Oct 21, 2026

Use for agentic commerce payments tasks. Candidate synthesized from trend radar; awaiting trial promotion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openamer/openamer8Updated Oct 21, 2026

See all skills by openamer

Report a problem with this skill