Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

convex-launch-readiness

Combine Convex authorization, code quality, performance, and failure audits into one readiness report. It removes duplicate findings, scores confirmed issues with a stated formula, and orders the fixes while clearly identifying checks that could not run.

OriginalShow the original description

Run every Convex audit (authz, reviewer, advisor, insights) into one scored, deduped readiness report with an ordered fix plan — Lighthouse for your backend.

See how to install

Good for

  • Reviewing a Convex app before launch
  • Combining audit findings into one report
  • Prioritizing authorization and performance fixes
  • Comparing readiness scores after fixes

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

<!-- GENERATED from convex-agents content/capabilities/launch-readiness.json — do not edit by hand. -->

Launch-readiness report

Readiness is not one check — it's the union of the checks, deduped, ranked, and scored. This capability is pure composition over the findings bus (specs/finding.schema.json): it runs each audit capability, normalizes their outputs into one report (specs/finding-report.schema.json), computes an auditable score, and — because every finding names a fixCapability — hands the user a prioritized, actionable punch list instead of four separate reports. It fixes nothing itself; it decides WHAT to fix and in what order, then dispatches to the fixers.

Workflow

  1. GUARD + SCOPE: deploy-guard classifies the target (local-anonymous / dev / preview / prod); announce it. Detect what's assessable — is there a convex/ dir, a deployed deployment with traffic, an auth foundation? Skip passes whose preconditions aren't met and SAY which were skipped (a skipped pass is not a pass).
  2. RUN THE PASSES, each emitting findings on the bus:
    • convex-authz — the authz scan (identity-from-arg, missing ownership, PII leak, parent-ref-on-write). Always runnable on code.
    • convex-reviewer — validators, indexes-not-filter, idiom, error handling. Always runnable on code.
    • convex-advisor — live read-limit / OCC evidence (only if a deployment with traffic exists; else record 'skipped: no traffic').
    • convex-insights — recent failures from logs (only if a deployment exists). Run independent passes concurrently; each returns findings, not fixes.
  3. NORMALIZE + DEDUPE: collect all findings into one report. Set each finding's identity field to a normalized function/table key (e.g. messages:list) that is the SAME whether the pass reported a code-locus or a deployment-locus for that function — so the SAME defect seen from two loci (reviewer flags a missing index at code-locus, advisor flags its read-limit symptom at deployment-locus) collapses to ONE via the bus's (class, identity) dedup and isn't double-counted in the score. Keep the higher-confidence source. Drop nothing silently; a pass that errored/was skipped is a stated coverage gap, not a clean result.
  4. SCORE, auditable: start at 100; subtract per CONFIRMED finding by severity (high −15, med −5, low −1), floor at 0; print the exact formula and the per-class breakdown so the number is reproducible, not a vibe. plausible-only findings are listed as candidates but do NOT move the score (evidence-not-vibes). A deployment/traffic-less run reports a code-only score and says so.
  5. REPORT: the score, then findings ranked by severity, each with its evidence, its locus, and the fixCapability + a one-line fix note. Group by 'blockers' (high) / 'should-fix' (med) / 'nice-to-have' (low). End with the ordered fix plan: which capability to run next, in what order (authz/data-loss first, then perf/scale, then idiom/observability).
  6. DISPATCH on request: for each finding the user accepts, invoke its fixCapability (convex-authz, convex-reviewer's fixers, migrate-rehearse for schema changes, suggest for component swaps). After fixes, RE-RUN the affected passes and show the score delta — the readiness number is only meaningful if it moves when you fix things.
  7. Never claim more coverage than was run: the report header lists which passes ran, which were skipped and why. A green score on a code-only run is 'code looks ready', not 'production-verified'.

Rules

  • Compose, don't re-implement: run the existing audit capabilities and aggregate their bus findings — never re-derive an authz or perf check inline.
  • The score counts CONFIRMED findings only, by severity, with the formula printed; plausible findings are candidates that don't move the number.
  • Normalize each finding's locus to a function/table identity before dedup (map deployment functionId ↔ code file:line) so one defect seen from two loci collapses to one and isn't double-scored; keep the higher-confidence source; drop nothing silently.
  • Every finding carries its fixCapability; the report ends with an ORDERED fix plan (data-loss/authz first, then scale, then idiom/observability).
  • Re-run affected passes after fixes and show the score delta — a readiness number that doesn't move when you fix things is theater.
  • Never claim more than was run: header lists ran/skipped passes; a code-only run yields a code-only score, explicitly labeled.
  • This is a read + aggregate + dispatch pass; fixes happen in the fixer capabilities, gated by their own consent/deploy-target rules.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

autoreview

FreeSummary

Review code using shared OpenClaw instructions and a Python helper, while also following the target repository’s review requirements. This skill points to a common installation that supplies the actual review procedure.

  • Reviewing code with shared OpenClaw instructions
  • Applying repository-specific review requirements
  • Keeping shared review instructions up to date
openclaw/clawhub9.5KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

axiom-alerting

FreeSummary

Create and manage Axiom alert rules and notification destinations through its API. Connect alerts to email, Slack, or webhooks, check monitor history, and adjust thresholds and evaluation schedules to address excessive or missing alerts.

  • Set up error alerts and notification destinations
  • Tune monitors that send too many alerts
  • Investigate monitors that never trigger
openclaw/clawhub9.5KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

axiom-sre

FreeSummary

Investigate production incidents and bugs using logs, metrics, and code evidence. The skill guides hypothesis testing, root cause analysis, fix validation, and reusable investigation notes, with access to configured observability tools such as Axiom.

  • Investigate production outages and rising error rates
  • Trace causes using logs, metrics, and code
  • Reproduce bugs and validate minimal fixes
openclaw/clawhub9.5KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Design and build Axiom dashboards from logs or metrics, the numerical measurements of system behavior. Create charts, filters, and layouts for monitoring and reporting, or migrate existing Splunk and Grafana panels while validating queries against available data.

  • Build a service health monitoring dashboard
  • Create interactive filters for investigating logs
  • Migrate dashboards from Splunk or Grafana
openclaw/clawhub9.5KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Drafts, previews, sends, and records emails for existing ClawHub content rights cases. It supports publisher removal notices and requester updates, requires approval of the final draft, and preserves the exact correspondence in the case record.

  • Preparing a skill removal notice for a publisher
  • Sending a requester a progress update or closure note
  • Preserving sent correspondence in an existing rights case
openclaw/clawhub9.5KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

clawhub-convex

FreeSummary

Apply ClawHub-specific rules when developing with Convex, including deployment targeting, runtime checks, data migrations, search performance, and skill statistics. It also directs specialized work to the appropriate companion skills.

  • Changing Convex functions or schemas
  • Planning production data migrations
  • Reviewing search query performance
openclaw/clawhub9.5KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by openclaw

Report a problem with this skill