Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

update-v8-version

Update Codex's pinned V8 and rusty_v8 versions, synchronize build settings and checksums, and validate a release candidate. If validation fails, investigate upstream changes and adjust the affected build files to restore a working build.

OriginalShow the original description

Update Codex's pinned `v8` / `rusty_v8` versions, validate the release-candidate path, and investigate failed V8 canary or artifact builds. Use when asked to bump V8, update `rusty_v8` artifacts, prepare or validate a V8 release candidate, check `v8-canary`, or diagnose why a V8 version update no longer builds.

See how to install

Good for

  • Update Codex's pinned V8 and rusty_v8 versions
  • Update prebuilt artifacts and checksums
  • Validate a V8 release candidate
  • Investigate canary or artifact build failures

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.3 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml228 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Update V8 Version

Core Workflow

  1. Read third_party/v8/README.md and follow its version-bump sequence. Treat that document as the release-process source of truth.

  2. Inspect and update the concrete repo surfaces that carry the pin:

    • codex-rs/Cargo.toml
    • codex-rs/Cargo.lock
    • MODULE.bazel
    • third_party/v8/BUILD.bazel
    • third_party/v8/README.md
    • the matching third_party/v8/rusty_v8_<version>.sha256 manifest when the remaining prebuilt inputs change
  3. Keep the existing checksum helpers in the loop:

    python3 .github/scripts/rusty_v8_bazel.py update-module-bazel
    python3 .github/scripts/rusty_v8_bazel.py check-module-bazel
    python3 -m unittest discover -s .github/scripts -p test_rusty_v8_bazel.py
    
  4. Validate the release-candidate path before broadening the work:

    • Prefer checking the v8-canary CI result for the candidate branch or PR when one exists, using GitHub check tooling or gh as appropriate.
    • If CI is unavailable or the user asked for a local-only check, run the closest local validation that is practical for the changed surface and say explicitly that it is a local substitute, not the full hosted canary.
  5. If the canary path passes, stop there. Summarize the result and encourage the user to commit the candidate changes or proceed with the release flow they requested. Do not publish tags, releases, or pushes unless the user asked.

Failure Path

Enter this path only when the canary or local build path fails.

  1. Capture the failing target, workflow job, and first actionable error.
  2. Compare the currently pinned version with the target version at the relevant upstream tag or SHA. Inspect both:
    • denoland/rusty_v8
    • upstream V8 source at the target Bazel-pinned version
  3. Track build-relevant deltas rather than broad source churn:
    • generated binding layout changes
    • archive or asset naming changes
    • GN/Bazel target changes
    • custom libc++ / libc++abi / llvm-libc inputs
    • sandbox or pointer-compression feature relationships
    • patch hunks in patches/ that no longer apply or no longer match upstream
  4. Trace each failing delta back into Codex's build graph:
    • MODULE.bazel
    • third_party/v8/BUILD.bazel
    • .github/scripts/rusty_v8_bazel.py
    • .github/workflows/v8-canary.yml
    • .github/workflows/rusty-v8-release.yml
  5. Update only the pieces required to restore the target version's build and artifact contract. Keep patch explanations and doc changes close to the affected files.
  6. Re-run the focused validation. If it becomes green, return to the normal workflow and stop with a concise summary plus the remaining release step.

Reporting

  • Say whether validation came from hosted v8-canary or from a local substitute.
  • Distinguish "version bump complete" from "release published".
  • When blocked, report the upstream delta that matters, the Codex file it hits, and the next concrete fix to try.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

babysit-pr

FreeSummary

Monitor a GitHub pull request for review feedback, automated check failures, and merge readiness. Diagnose failures, fix problems caused by the branch, and retry likely temporary failures while continuing to watch for updates.

  • Monitor automated checks after opening a pull request
  • Address actionable review feedback
  • Distinguish code failures from temporary service problems
openinterpreter/openinterpreter68.6KUpdated Oct 11, 2026

Review external integration points for breaking changes that could disrupt existing use. Examine app-server APIs, command-line parameters, configuration loading, and session resumption from saved records, continuing beyond the first issue to cover possible failure paths.

  • Check app-server API compatibility
  • Review changes to command-line parameters
  • Check compatibility of configuration loading
openinterpreter/openinterpreter68.6KUpdated Oct 11, 2026

code-review

FreeSummary

Run a final pull request review using separate agents for each available review skill. Collect all reported issues into a numbered Markdown list, with a specific file path and line number for every finding.

  • Run a final review of a pull request
  • Combine findings from multiple review skills
  • Locate issues by file path and line number
openinterpreter/openinterpreter68.6KUpdated Oct 11, 2026

Assess whether a code change is small enough to review using line-count guidance. For larger changes, examine the actual differences, dependencies, and calling code to suggest reviewable stages and the smallest coherent first step.

  • Check the size of a change before requesting review
  • Assess the scope of a complex logic change
  • Plan reviewable stages for a large change
openinterpreter/openinterpreter68.6KUpdated Oct 11, 2026

Review code that manages the conversation history and extra information sent to Codex models. Apply rules for incremental history, size limits, cache stability, manual review of large additions, and required implementation structures.

  • Review changes to conversation history handling
  • Check size limits on information sent to the model
  • Identify large additions requiring manual review
openinterpreter/openinterpreter68.6KUpdated Oct 11, 2026

Plan and write tests for changes to agent behavior, favoring integration tests that check components together. Identify key logic changes and user-visible behavior to cover, reuse existing helpers, and keep unit tests in dedicated files.

  • Identify test coverage for changes to agent logic
  • Add integration tests for user-visible behavior
  • Organize unit tests in dedicated files
openinterpreter/openinterpreter68.6KUpdated Oct 11, 2026

See all skills by openinterpreter

Report a problem with this skill