Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

computation-reviewer

Check whether numeric claims marked with Evidence aliases in an Artifact agree with the linked Evidence content and context.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery178 stars(GitHub 178 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md1.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Computation Reviewer

Run on the same locked Artifact with its supplied Evidence Bundle. In the bounded Deep pipeline, this local Evidence comparison runs before Citation source verification.

Required checks

  1. Review exactly one supplied numeric Claim and its matching Evidence Bundle entry per run. The Claim must contain a number and an [evN] alias in the same sentence or Markdown table cell.
  2. Compare value, unit, range, sample size, population, subgroup, endpoint, and statistical context with the linked Evidence.
  3. Distinguish exact support, value or unit contradiction, scope mismatch, interpretation overreach, and insufficient evidence.
  4. Return INCONCLUSIVE when the Evidence excerpt does not contain enough context; do not report insufficient content as a value mismatch.

Output

Return only the required structured result. Use a concrete COMPUTATION_* finding code such as COMPUTATION_EVIDENCE_VALUE_MISMATCH, COMPUTATION_EVIDENCE_SCOPE_MISMATCH, COMPUTATION_EVIDENCE_INTERPRETATION_OVERREACH, or COMPUTATION_EVIDENCE_INSUFFICIENT. Preserve the supplied Evidence alias and provide one concise reason; do not invent a separate correction field that the review protocol cannot persist.

Boundaries

  • Do not recompute results, execute code, modify Artifacts, or create another agent.
  • Do not treat topical similarity as numeric support.
  • Preserve Evidence aliases and provide a concise reason for every mismatch.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Prepare, launch, monitor, and summarize the real RFdiffusion to ProteinMPNN to Protenix antibody pipeline on a local or remote ScienceDiscovery Runner with sandboxed Ascend NPUs.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery178Updated Oct 26, 2026

Independent multi-dimensional assessor for material design candidates. Loads configurable scoring rubrics to evaluate candidates from different expert perspectives. Each dispatch produces structured scores, pros/cons, and verification data without sharing results with other assessors.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery178Updated Oct 26, 2026

ci

Free

Read, diagnose, and change the CI pipeline: GitHub Actions on pull requests, the merge queue, the nightly schedule and the release tag. Use when a job fails, when editing .github/workflows/, when asking which layer runs what, when reproducing a pipeline failure locally, or when a job needs the bubblewrap sandbox. Running the layers before proposing a change, and reading the result a proposal receives, belong to create-github-pr.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery178Updated Oct 26, 2026

Verify cited paper identity and decide whether claims in an Artifact are supported by their linked Evidence using a governed source snapshot.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery178Updated Oct 26, 2026

Use this skill when you need to write and execute Python/R code to process, transform, and analyze data, delivering reproducible computational results with complete code-level methodology documentation. Supports statistical analysis, data transformation, visualization, method justification, and structured result output.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery178Updated Oct 26, 2026

Open or update a pull request on GitHub's openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery: run the UT/ST/E2E layers locally, push the branch to the operator's own GitHub fork, write a body that says what was verified with numbers, apply exactly one release:* label so the release note can classify it, then read the pull request and its Actions run back. Use when asked to create a PR, submit a change for review, when a branch is ready to propose, when labelling a pull request for the release note, or when reading a GitHub Actions result on a pull request. This is the only path for proposing a change: gitcode.com is a read-only mirror with no pipeline of its own. Titles and bodies are English. For filing an issue, or for the gh commands this procedure assumes, read the github skill first.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery178Updated Oct 26, 2026

See all skills by openJiuwen-ai

Report a problem with this skill