Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

prcheckloop

Investigate failing or pending checks on the latest commit of a GitHub pull request. Reproduce actionable failures, fix and push changes, then recheck remotely until checks pass or a specific blocker is reported.

OriginalShow the original description

Iterate on a GitHub PR until latest-head checks are green or a precise blocker is named. Use when a PR still has failing or pending checks after review fixes, including after greploop.

Works withGitHub
See how to install

Good for

  • Fixing CI failures after review changes
  • Investigating checks that remain pending
  • Verifying remote checks after pushing fixes
  • Reporting credential or external service blockers

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md5.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

PRCheckloop

Get a GitHub PR to a fully green check state, or exit with a concrete blocker.

Scope

  • GitHub PRs only. If the repo is GitLab, stop and use check-pr.
  • Focus on checks for the latest PR head SHA, not old commits.
  • Focus on CI/status checks, not review comments or PR template cleanup.
  • If the user also wants review-comment cleanup, pair this with check-pr.

Inputs

  • PR number (optional): If not provided, detect the PR for the current branch.
  • Max iterations: default 5.

Workflow

1. Identify the PR

If no PR number is provided, detect it from the current branch:

gh pr view --json number,headRefName,headRefOid,url,isDraft

If needed, switch to the PR branch before making changes.

Stop early if:

  • gh is not authenticated
  • there is no PR for the branch
  • the repo is not hosted on GitHub

2. Track the latest head SHA

Always work against the current PR head SHA:

PR_JSON=$(gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --json number,headRefName,headRefOid,url)
HEAD_SHA=$(echo "$PR_JSON" | jq -r .headRefOid)
PR_URL=$(echo "$PR_JSON" | jq -r .url)

Ignore failing checks from older SHAs. After every push, refresh HEAD_SHA and restart the inspection loop.

3. Inventory checks for that SHA

Fetch both GitHub check runs and legacy commit status contexts:

gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/$HEAD_SHA/check-runs?per_page=100"
gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/$HEAD_SHA/status"

For a compact PR-level view, this GraphQL payload is useful:

gh api graphql -f query='
query($owner:String!, $repo:String!, $pr:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner, name:$repo) {
    pullRequest(number:$pr) {
      headRefOid
      url
      statusCheckRollup {
        contexts(first:100) {
          nodes {
            __typename
            ... on CheckRun { name status conclusion detailsUrl workflowName }
            ... on StatusContext { context state targetUrl description }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}' -F owner=OWNER -F repo=REPO -F pr="$PR_NUMBER"

4. Wait for checks to actually run

After a new push, checks can take a moment to appear. Poll every 15-30 seconds until one of these is true:

  • checks have appeared and every item is in a terminal state
  • checks have appeared and at least one failed
  • no checks appear after a reasonable wait, usually 2 minutes

Treat these as terminal success states:

  • check runs: SUCCESS, NEUTRAL, SKIPPED
  • status contexts: SUCCESS

Treat these as pending:

  • check runs: QUEUED, PENDING, WAITING, REQUESTED, IN_PROGRESS
  • status contexts: PENDING

Treat these as failures:

  • check runs: FAILURE, TIMED_OUT, CANCELLED, ACTION_REQUIRED, STARTUP_FAILURE, STALE
  • status contexts: FAILURE, ERROR

If no checks appear for the latest SHA, inspect .github/workflows/, workflow path filters, and branch protection expectations. If the missing check cannot be caused or fixed from the repo, escalate.

5. Investigate failing checks

For GitHub Actions failures, inspect runs and failed logs for the current SHA:

gh run list --commit "$HEAD_SHA" --json databaseId,workflowName,status,conclusion,url,headSha
gh run view <RUN_ID> --json databaseId,name,workflowName,status,conclusion,jobs,url,headSha
gh run view <RUN_ID> --log-failed

For each failing check, classify it:

Failure typeAction
Code/test regressionReproduce locally, fix, and verify
Lint/type/build mismatchRun the matching local command from the workflow and fix it
Flake or transient infra issueRerun once if evidence supports flakiness
External service/status app failureEscalate with the details URL and owner guess
Missing secret/permission/branch protection issueEscalate immediately

Only rerun a failed job once without code changes. Do not loop on reruns.

6. Fix actionable failures

If the failure is actionable from the checked-out code:

  1. Read the workflow or failing command to identify the real gate.
  2. Reproduce locally where reasonable.
  3. Make the smallest correct fix.
  4. Run focused verification first, then broader verification if needed.
  5. Commit in a logical commit.
  6. Push before re-checking the PR.

Do not stop at a local fix. The loop is only complete when the remote PR checks for the new head SHA are green.

7. Push and repeat

After each fix:

git push
sleep 5

Then refresh the PR metadata, get the new HEAD_SHA, and restart from Step 3.

Exit the loop only when:

  • all checks for the latest head SHA are green, or
  • a blocker remains after reasonable repair effort, or
  • the max iteration count is reached

8. Escalate blockers precisely

If you cannot get the PR green, report:

  • PR URL
  • latest head SHA
  • exact failing or missing check names
  • details URLs
  • what you already tried
  • why it is blocked
  • who should likely unblock it
  • the next concrete action

Good blocker examples:

  • external status app outage
  • missing GitHub secret or permission
  • required check name mismatch in branch protection
  • persistent flake after one rerun
  • failure needs credentials or infrastructure access you do not have

Output

When the skill completes, report:

  • PR URL and branch
  • final head SHA
  • green/pending/failing check summary
  • fixes made and verification run
  • whether changes were pushed
  • blocker summary if not fully green

Notes

  • This skill is intentionally narrower than check-pr: it is a repair loop for PR checks.
  • This skill complements greploop: Greptile can be perfect while CI is still red.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add or extend Paperclip end-to-end evaluations that exercise real browser workflows across the server, database, and runner. Define expected outcomes, check independent evidence, and connect results to the existing reporting pipeline for local or Daytona execution.

  • Adding an evaluation for a complete user workflow
  • Updating test data and outcome checks
  • Including screenshots and artifacts in evaluation reports
paperclipai/paperclip104.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

add-runner-eval

FreeSummary

Add or extend Paperclip Runner evaluations that test real sessions against a mock control service. Define observable pass conditions, validate cases and run selections, and retain source revisions, evidence, and costs for authorized live runs.

  • Adding a focused Runner protocol evaluation
  • Testing grading rules with valid and invalid evidence
  • Updating evaluation selections and campaign membership
paperclipai/paperclip104.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

agent-browser

FreeSummary

Use a real browser to verify web pages and apps through short, supervised interactions. Capture screenshots, inspect errors and network requests, and document reproducible steps for UI bugs or expected behavior checks.

  • Capture screenshots to verify UI changes
  • Read content rendered by JavaScript
  • Reproduce UI bugs and record errors
paperclipai/paperclip104.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

agentmail

FreeSummary

Read email linked to assigned Paperclip tasks, send new messages or replies through an assigned AgentMail inbox, and check delivery outcomes. Follow task permissions and preserve retry identifiers to avoid duplicate sends.

  • Reading email context attached to an assigned task
  • Sending a new email from an assigned inbox
  • Replying to a specific message in a conversation
paperclipai/paperclip104.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

check-pr

FreeSummary

Inspect proposed changes in GitHub, GitLab, or Perforce for review feedback, failed automated checks, and incomplete descriptions. It separates actionable findings from informational or resolved comments, then helps fix issues and close addressed review threads when requested.

  • Inspect a change before submission
  • Identify failed checks and required fixes
  • Organize human and bot review feedback
paperclipai/paperclip104.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

company-creator

FreeSummary

Create an AI agent company or team package from an idea or an existing repository. Define roles, reporting lines, skills, and work handoffs, then generate structured files that follow the Agent Companies specification.

  • Build an agent company from an idea
  • Turn a repository into an agent team package
  • Define agent roles and work handoffs
paperclipai/paperclip104.3KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

See all skills by paperclipai

Report a problem with this skill