Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

wiki-query

Answer questions using Paperclip wiki pages and original sources, with citations for each claim. Identify missing information clearly and, with user approval, save useful comparisons or explanations as linked wiki pages for future reference.

OriginalShow the original description

Use when an LLM Wiki operation issue asks a question. Answer from wiki pages and raw sources with citations, name gaps plainly, and offer to file durable synthesis when the answer should compound.

See how to install

Good for

  • Ask questions about information stored in a wiki
  • Check wiki claims against original sources
  • Save useful comparisons as reusable wiki pages
  • Identify sources needed to fill knowledge gaps

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Wiki Query

Answer a question from what the wiki actually contains, with citations.

Inputs

  • An operation issue with operationType: "query" and the question in the body.
  • The operation issue's target wikiId, spaceSlug, and space root.

Workflow

  1. Open the target space's wiki/index.md first — it is the navigation aid. Identify candidate pages.
  2. Read the candidate pages end to end with wiki_read_page, always passing the operation issue's wikiId and spaceSlug. Follow [[wiki-links]] to neighbouring pages when the question spans entities or concepts.
  3. Inspect raw sources when a wiki page's claim feels thin. The wiki points to raw/ precisely so you can verify before answering. Use wiki_read_source.
  4. Answer the question in the operation issue thread. Structure:
    • Direct answer first, in 1–4 sentences.
    • Then the supporting facts as bullet points, each with an inline citation: (see [[wiki/concepts/managed-resources]]) or (see raw/<filename>).
    • If you needed to read a raw source the wiki did not summarise, name that as a gap.
  5. Decide whether the answer is durable. If the question forced you to do real synthesis (a comparison, a tradeoff, a definition of something that isn't already a page), offer to file it under wiki/synthesis/<slug>.md. Do not write the synthesis page silently — it is opt-in. If the user accepts, write the page, link it from wiki/index.md, and append a query | filed synthesis log entry.
  6. When the wiki cannot answer, say so plainly. Suggest a source the user should ingest, a Paperclip project that would help if distilled, or a web lookup. Never bluff.

Voice

  • Lead with the answer.
  • Cite as you go, not in a footnote block at the end.
  • Use the wiki's terse, factual voice. The query response is itself a candidate for filing into wiki/synthesis/.

Verification

Before closing the operation issue:

  • Every claim in the answer cites a wiki page or raw source.
  • If the wiki was insufficient, that is stated directly with a concrete next step (ingest source X, distill project Y, web search Z).
  • If you wrote a synthesis page, wiki/index.md lists it and wiki/log.md has a query | filed synthesis entry.
  • No file under raw/ was modified.

Tools

wiki_search, wiki_read_page, wiki_list_sources, wiki_read_source, wiki_write_page (only when filing synthesis). Always include the operation issue's wikiId and spaceSlug.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add or extend Paperclip end-to-end evaluations that exercise real browser workflows across the server, database, and runner. Define expected outcomes, check independent evidence, and connect results to the existing reporting pipeline for local or Daytona execution.

  • Adding an evaluation for a complete user workflow
  • Updating test data and outcome checks
  • Including screenshots and artifacts in evaluation reports
paperclipai/paperclip104.1KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

add-runner-eval

FreeSummary

Add or extend Paperclip Runner evaluations that test real sessions against a mock control service. Define observable pass conditions, validate cases and run selections, and retain source revisions, evidence, and costs for authorized live runs.

  • Adding a focused Runner protocol evaluation
  • Testing grading rules with valid and invalid evidence
  • Updating evaluation selections and campaign membership
paperclipai/paperclip104.1KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

agent-browser

FreeSummary

Use a real browser to verify web pages and apps through short, supervised interactions. Capture screenshots, inspect errors and network requests, and document reproducible steps for UI bugs or expected behavior checks.

  • Capture screenshots to verify UI changes
  • Read content rendered by JavaScript
  • Reproduce UI bugs and record errors
paperclipai/paperclip104.1KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

agentmail

FreeSummary

Read email linked to assigned Paperclip tasks, send new messages or replies through an assigned AgentMail inbox, and check delivery outcomes. Follow task permissions and preserve retry identifiers to avoid duplicate sends.

  • Reading email context attached to an assigned task
  • Sending a new email from an assigned inbox
  • Replying to a specific message in a conversation
paperclipai/paperclip104.1KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

check-pr

FreeSummary

Inspect proposed changes in GitHub, GitLab, or Perforce for review feedback, failed automated checks, and incomplete descriptions. It separates actionable findings from informational or resolved comments, then helps fix issues and close addressed review threads when requested.

  • Inspect a change before submission
  • Identify failed checks and required fixes
  • Organize human and bot review feedback
paperclipai/paperclip104.1KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

company-creator

FreeSummary

Create an AI agent company or team package from an idea or an existing repository. Define roles, reporting lines, skills, and work handoffs, then generate structured files that follow the Agent Companies specification.

  • Build an agent company from an idea
  • Turn a repository into an agent team package
  • Define agent roles and work handoffs
paperclipai/paperclip104.1KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

See all skills by paperclipai

Report a problem with this skill