Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHubEnglish overview

decide

Work through design or implementation choices one at a time, with concise context and clear alternatives. You can also review completed code change by change, recording decisions, approvals, and requested revisions in a final table.

OriginalShow the original description

Walk the user through design or implementation decisions one at a time, or review completed code one change at a time. Use when the user says "walk me through each decision", "let's decide together", "help me work through these choices", "walk me through what you did", or "QA step by step". Present concise context, mutually exclusive options, log each answer, and finish with a summary.

ParadevAI/Paradev15,724 stars(GitHub 15,724 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Compare design choices one decision at a time
  • Resolve implementation choices with recorded answers
  • Review completed code in logical steps
  • Collect approvals and revision requests for changes

Overview

What it does

This skill presents design and implementation decisions one at a time and records the choices. It examines related code to identify bugs, inconsistencies, and points that need a decision, then orders them by dependencies and impact. Each decision includes concrete context, the trade-offs, and two to four distinct options. The choices are collected in a final table.

When it helps

Use it when several design options are difficult to decide together or when you want to work through an implementation approach with an agent. It can also review completed code. For commits or pull requests, it groups changes into logical units and explains them using the actual code and file and line references.

Example requests

  • “Let’s work through the design choices one at a time.”
  • “Explain this pull request in order and check with me at each step.”

Notes

During a design discussion, the skill does not write implementation code. It does not discard existing edits or user-authored work without explicit approval. When an interactive question tool is available, it uses that tool; if the repository specifies an interaction interface, it follows that instruction. During code review, it waits for a response at each step and records approvals and requested revisions.

This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.

Document check

AI checked the SKILL.md for operations that need care and for setup requirements. The score comes only from actually running the skill (hands-on test).

SafetyAre sending data, deleting files, and running commands disclosed?
AGoodIt preserves edits without approval and waits for responses during review.
Easy setupDoes it need few tools or API keys, and are they documented?
AGoodThe material lists no required external tools, API keys, or services.

Not counted in the score. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 29, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.

Disagree? Request a re-evaluation

Tell us which point is wrong and why. No login needed. We will check it against the SKILL.md, redo the evaluation, and show the result here.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md2.7 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml196 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Decide

Prepare

Before a design walkthrough, inspect the relevant code and record concrete bugs, inconsistencies, and decision points in plans/<YYYYMMDD>-<topic>.md or the appropriate app-scoped plans/ directory. Preserve existing edits; never discard speculative or user-authored work without explicit approval.

Order decisions by dependency and leverage, not document order.

Decision walkthrough

For each decision:

  1. Show ## Decision N: <title>.
  2. Give two to four sentences of context grounded in real files or functions.
  3. State the trade-off in one sentence.
  4. Ask exactly one interactive question with two to four mutually exclusive options.
    • Use ask_user when available. In Codex Plan mode, use request_user_input when that is the exposed interactive question tool.
    • Never substitute a plain-text question when repository instructions require an interactive overlay.
    • Keep labels to five words or fewer.
    • Put the recommendation first and suffix its label with (Recommended).
    • Explain each option and its trade-off in one sentence.
    • Do not add an Other option when the client adds one automatically.
  5. After the answer, write Logged: <decision>. and continue.

If the user acknowledges an issue without choosing, log the recommended choice and say they can correct the assumption.

At the end, provide a | # | Decision | Choice | table and offer to turn the audit into an implementation plan. Do not write implementation code during the decision walkthrough.

QA walkthrough

Use this mode when the user wants to review existing code step by step.

  1. Identify the review unit: a commit, staged diff, PR, or explicit file set.
  2. Break it into logical steps in dependency order.
  3. Show one step per turn with:
    • ## Step N: <title>
    • One or two sentences explaining what changed and why
    • A focused real-code excerpt with file and line references
    • One interactive verdict question: Looks good, next step (Recommended), Push back, change this, and, only for non-trivial code, Pause, explain more
  4. Wait for the verdict before showing the next step.
  5. Log approvals, collect requested changes, and finish with a | # | Step | Verdict | table.

If a step reveals a genuine design fork, pause the QA walkthrough and offer to switch to decision mode for that fork.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

10x

FreeSummary

Review how you use Superset and identify unused features that fit your workflow. Get a short list of suggestions, learn about each option, and set up selected features such as scheduled agents, parallel workspaces, or shared tasks.

  • Find unused Superset features worth exploring
  • Set up scheduled agent tasks
  • Start parallel work in separate workspaces
ParadevAI/Paradev15.7KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

automate

FreeSummary

Set up recurring tasks in Superset with an agent prompt, a schedule or event trigger, and a chosen execution workspace. After explicit confirmation, create the automation, check its saved settings, and review a real first run.

  • Scheduling a daily or weekly agent task
  • Starting agent work when a GitHub pull request opens
  • Triggering tasks from selected Slack reactions
ParadevAI/Paradev15.7KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

browser

FreeSummary

Browse pages, click controls, fill fields, and inspect screenshots or console messages through Superset's browser pane. Use it to preview a running web app, check interface behavior, and work through browser tasks in a visible session.

  • Preview a locally running web app
  • Capture screenshots of a page
  • Inspect console errors
ParadevAI/Paradev15.7KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Build Stripe payments, subscriptions, and invoicing using verified documentation and API parameter definitions. The skill guides product selection, sandbox testing, and webhook handling, where server notifications determine payment and subscription state.

  • Choose Stripe products for payments or recurring billing
  • Implement Checkout or invoice flows
  • Investigate Stripe code that compiles but behaves incorrectly
ParadevAI/Paradev15.7KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

cdp-verification

FreeSummary

Verify a UI change or reproduce a bug in the running desktop app using the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP), a browser debugging interface. Follow the real user journey and compare screenshots with measurements such as route, scroll position, and persisted state.

  • Reproducing a UI bug in the running app
  • Verifying a UI change end to end
  • Checking behavior after a route or workspace switch
ParadevAI/Paradev15.7KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

ci-triage

FreeSummary

Diagnose failed GitHub Actions runs by finding the first meaningful error, separating code problems from infrastructure issues and intermittent failures, and comparing the base branch. Get a focused report explaining the PR’s involvement and recommended next steps.

  • Investigating failed PR checks
  • Separating intermittent test failures from code defects
  • Checking whether the base branch already fails
ParadevAI/Paradev15.7KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

See all skills by ParadevAI

Report a problem with this skill