Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

refactor

Code refactoring workflow - analyze → plan → implement → review → validate

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

/refactor - Refactoring Workflow

Safe refactoring with review gates.

When to Use

  • "Refactor X"
  • "Clean up this code"
  • "Extract this into a module"
  • "Improve the architecture of Y"
  • Large-scale code restructuring
  • Technical debt reduction

Workflow Overview

┌──────────┐    ┌────────────┐    ┌──────────┐    ┌──────────┐    ┌───────────┐
│ phoenix  │───▶│   plan-    │───▶│  kraken  │───▶│plan-reviewer│───▶│ arbiter  │
│          │    │   agent    │    │          │    │          │    │           │
└──────────┘    └────────────┘    └──────────┘    └──────────┘    └───────────┘
  Analyze         Plan             Implement       Review          Verify
  current         changes          refactor        changes         tests pass

Agent Sequence

#AgentRoleOutput
1phoenixAnalyze current code, identify improvement areasAnalysis report
2plan-agentCreate safe refactoring planStep-by-step plan
3krakenImplement the refactoringCode changes
4plan-reviewerReview changes for correctnessReview report
5arbiterVerify all tests still passTest report

Refactoring Principles

  1. Tests first: Ensure adequate test coverage before refactoring
  2. Small steps: Each change should be independently verifiable
  3. Behavior preserved: No functional changes during refactor
  4. Reviewable: Changes should be easy to review

Execution

Phase 1: Analyze

Task(
  subagent_type="phoenix",
  prompt="""
  Analyze for refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]

  Identify:
  - Current pain points
  - Code smells
  - Improvement opportunities
  - Risk areas
  - Test coverage gaps
  """
)

Phase 2: Plan

Task(
  subagent_type="plan-agent",
  prompt="""
  Plan refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]

  Analysis: [from phoenix]

  Create:
  - Step-by-step refactoring plan
  - Each step should be:
    - Small and focused
    - Independently testable
    - Reversible
  - Identify files affected
  - Risk mitigation strategy
  """
)

Phase 3: Implement

Task(
  subagent_type="kraken",
  prompt="""
  Implement refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]

  Plan: [from plan-agent]

  Requirements:
  - Follow plan exactly
  - Run tests after each step
  - Stop if tests fail
  - NO behavior changes
  """
)

Phase 4: Review

Task(
  subagent_type="plan-reviewer",
  prompt="""
  Review refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]

  Changes: [git diff from kraken]

  Check:
  - Behavior preserved
  - No unintended changes
  - Code quality improved
  - Patterns consistent
  """
)

Phase 5: Validate

Task(
  subagent_type="arbiter",
  prompt="""
  Validate refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]

  - Run full test suite
  - Verify no regressions
  - Check type errors
  - Run linting
  """
)

Refactoring Types

Extract Module

phoenix → plan-agent → kraken → plan-reviewer → arbiter

Rename/Restructure

phoenix → kraken → arbiter  (simpler, skip detailed planning)

Architecture Change

phoenix → plan-agent → [kraken → plan-reviewer] × N phases → arbiter

Example

User: /refactor Extract the validation logic into a separate module

Claude: Starting /refactor workflow...

Phase 1: Analyzing current structure...
[Spawns phoenix]
Found: Validation logic spread across 4 files
- form.ts (lines 45-120)
- api.ts (lines 200-280)
- user.ts (lines 15-45)
- order.ts (lines 88-130)

Phase 2: Planning extraction...
[Spawns plan-agent]
Plan:
1. Create src/validation/index.ts
2. Extract common validators
3. Update imports one file at a time
4. Run tests after each change

Phase 3: Implementing...
[Spawns kraken]
Completed all 4 steps, tests green after each

Phase 4: Reviewing changes...
[Spawns plan-reviewer]
✅ All behavior preserved
✅ DRY improved (removed 45 duplicate lines)
✅ New structure consistent

Phase 5: Final validation...
[Spawns arbiter]
✅ 312 tests passing, 0 regressions

Refactoring complete!

Safety Flags

  • --dry-run: Plan but don't implement
  • --step-by-step: Pause after each change for approval
  • --coverage-check: Require >80% coverage before proceeding

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Agent Context Isolation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33.9KUpdated Jan 27, 2026

Agent Orchestration Rules

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33.9KUpdated Jan 27, 2026

Agentic Workflow Pattern

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33.9KUpdated Jan 27, 2026

Guide for integrating Agentica SDK with Claude Code CLI proxy

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33.9KUpdated Jan 27, 2026

Reference guide for Agentica multi-agent infrastructure APIs

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33.9KUpdated Jan 27, 2026

Write reliable prompts for Agentica/REPL agents that avoid LLM instruction ambiguity

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33.9KUpdated Jan 27, 2026

See all skills by parcadei

Report a problem with this skill